The GRE, is a significant step in the graduate college or business college application process.The GRE argument Essay requires the candidates to analyze the argument and look for its assumptions and flaws. This GRE argument essay talks about the nutritional value of ichthyoid, a supplement derived from fish oil. Candidates can practice similar topics in GRE writing practice papers.

Topic: West Meria

The report was published in the West Meria Public Health Council's newsletter. In this letter, the author suggests taking Ichthyoid, a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil, on a daily basis to help prevent cold and lower absenteeism. To back up this recommendation, the author points out that absences from school and work are always due to cold. And residents in East Meria, where fish consumption is high, visit the doctor only once or twice a year for tetanus shots.

According to a memo posted on the West Meria Public Health Council, absenteeism in the area is caused by cold, so the use of fish should be increased due to a doctor visit once a year. The report claims to be a novel approach to eliminating or reducing absenteeism in schools and workplaces. This metric was developed based on a study report conducted near East Meria, where residents consume a lot of fish. They assumed that because of the high consumption of fish in the area, people suffer from cold and visit the doctor less frequently.

The preceding argument appears convincing at first glance, but closer examination reveals that the claim is not supported by credible arguments, which are listed below.

Also, check:

To begin, absences from work and school can occur for a variety of reasons, with sickness and health issues or can be any personal reason being one of the most commonly used justifications. Other causes of absenteeism from school and work are completely ignored by the author. We don't know whether the health condition is the sole cause or not because no evidence has been presented. Furthermore, no statistics have been provided as to whether the cold is the sole cause of absenteeism in East Meria.

Second, assuming that because people in East Meria eat a lot of fish, they don't go to the doctor as often, does not provide us with strong evidence in relating it to absenteeism rates.

There was no mention of the cause of the cold or any other diseases, implying that the area near East Meria only suffers from cold throughout the year. There is no mention of the time of year when this small number of people goes to the doctor. Because a cold does not always necessitate the assistance of a doctor, there may be many cases of cold that go unreported by a doctor.

Furthermore, we do not know whether people in East Meria avoid going to the doctor solely because they eat healthy foods. People who do not visit doctors may do so for a variety of reasons, including the fact that they obtain their medications from pharmacists. Perhaps they use some traditional home-based methods for treatment. They may become ill, but they do not seek medical attention due to a variety of factors, including transportation and financial constraints.

Third, even if people in West Meria are cold for reasons other than not eating fish, it is possible that they do not wear enough clothing; it is also possible that they are prone to extreme weather conditions. Getting cold cannot be attributed solely to a decrease in the amount of fish available.

And only eating fish According to the report, people do not suffer from cold, but this does not imply that no vegan or vegetarian families are residing in Meria. There is no report or survey on the number of people who consume fish and the frequency with which they do so. The age group of those who went to the doctor is also unknown. The report lacks important facts and evidence to prove that eating fish is the only way to treat cold in their area.

ichthyoid will have the same effect on people as a fish would if it had no fortification. There is no mention of what type of fish the people consume because each fish has a different nutritional value and importance, so fish oil requires extensive research before it can be prescribed to the people of East Meria. A comparison study of the people of East Meria and nearby areas would also yield interesting results.

Finally, even if all of the preceding assumptions were correct, it was not possible to agree with the claim. The author is comparing two distinct locations despite similarities in a variety of factors such as population, weather, educational systems, and work environment. As a result, some conditions that apply in one location may not be applicable in another.

The report lacks strong evidence and facts to back up its suggestion to reduce absenteeism. The novel treatment may benefit only a subset of the population because it is unknown how many people eat fish and are willing to consume fish oil on a daily basis. Because the treatment is not universal to all men, action in support of it is not appropriate at this time.

A thorough analysis revealed that the author's claim is not strongly supported by reliable evidence, implying that more research is needed to suggest some recommendations to prevent high absenteeism in West Meria. Furthermore, the author has presented a jumble of random causes and effects that must be clarified in order to provide better recommendations.