The GRE AWA section in the exam assesses candidates’ capacity to think logically and cohesively, as well as ability to communicate and support reasons. The GRE AWA becomes a crucial tool for demonstrating your critical thinking and analytical abilities. The Well-Being Of A Society Is Enhanced When Many Of Its People Question Authority GRE Issue Essay is the topic in GRE AWA. The model answer on this topic has been given below. Candidates need to ensure that they are able to present their opinions and ideas clearly with valid reasons and examples.

Candidates can follow the below mentioned structure for writing their essay:

Introduction: Students have to introduce the topic directly. Candidates need to evaluate the topic and present its opinion in support or against the given statement. Accordingly, the reasons that the candidate would present for its opinion needs to be stated briefly in this paragraph. Further, the potential instances that would be used by the candidate to support the reasons need to be mentioned here.
Body Paragraph 1: One has to state his or her position about the topic clearly here. The strongest example can be stated which will be helpful to make a clear understanding and carry forward the other parts of the essay. Based on the given topic of this GRE Analyse an Issue essay
Body Paragraph 2: Giving proper real life examples are very me here. Students have to write relevant examples which will support their stand about the topic. Candidates need to ensure that their second reason is supported with examples which have real life value and are not vague.
Final Paragraph: Here a student has to write why he chose those examples and how it is relevant to support his own stand. This clarification should be very specific and brief. The final paragraph should state the topic and provide the third reason for the opinion. Accordingly, the reasons for the final paragraph need to prove that the given statement for the essay topic is wrong.
Conclusion: In this last paragraph the student should make a contrast and show that his argument is right, and the given topic is wrong. After stating proper reasons he has to write clearly his stand again and conclude the essay.

Thus, using this structure of the essay will be very helpful in making a good score. Furthermore, it will give a very good structure to the essay. Major Policy Decisions Should Always Be Left to Politicians and Other Government Experts GRE Issue Essay should be written with careful analysis. For this issue one can use these strategies to write a well planned essay. The strategies :

• It is important for stating relevancy of the topic and taking a clear stand about the topic. Accordingly, candidates should state their chosen opinion while introducing the essay and stick to it entirely. Unlike the GRE Analyse an Argument, candidates need to provide their opinion and not refute the given argument.
• Giving relevant, real life experience is very important. No assumption can be used here as examples. Candidates should provide their examples which are not vague hence, using real-life examples is suggested.
• Clarification of the stand must be stated clearly and briefly. Using cause and effect patterns can be helpful. It will be a clear understanding of the example which would help in validating the opinion of the candidate better. Moreover, they are required to present brief points for GRE analysis of an issue.
• Contrasting with the topic and proving that topic wrong is a good step to conclude the essay. Candidates should ensure that in their concluding paragraph, they restate the topic of the essay and the opinion of the candidates. This should be followed by briefly stating the reasons and concluding that the given statement is wrong.

Read More GRE Issue Articles

Topic: The Well-Being Of A Society Is Enhanced When Many Of Its People Question Authority GRE Issue Essay

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Model Answer:

We have often seen ordinary people raising the question to the people in power but is it fruitful enough? Does the authority ought to answer to the public? If yes, then how does it benefit society? When people live in a group, it forms a society, and when there is a society, it is essential to address all the needs of the people there. Therefore, there is a need for a governing body or a group in power. The general public elects their representatives to formulate laws for a better, well-off living. This governing body or people in power will be responsible for looking into the requirements of the ordinary people. Moreover, we may say, into the well-being of the society. They are responsible for creating a suitable environment for our living. But there may be certain times when we feel that things are not happening as we imagined or thought. In that scenario, ordinary people have the right to question the governing body.

There are many advantages of questioning authority. People will have clearer views of the political functioning and the legal and social activities of the authority. There will be a better understanding that will enhance the greater participation of the people in accord with the authority. It will help people to put forward their grievances against any unsatisfactory practice. Taking suggestions from ordinary people will help the authorities to cater to the interest of the society in a better manner. Moreover, there are possibilities of newer outcomes and ideas from people that the Government can embrace. Questions can be raised against inefficient practices, corruption and scandals. These often plague the governance, and efficient solutions and actions can be sought. At times, it may also happen that while working for the well-being of society, a few things might get missed. In that case, questioning is better.

When we have the right to know from the ruling authority about issues like the efficient voting system. It changes the current ruling party's aims at fund allocations for a new financial year. And the market economy- we as ordinary people of the society can benefit a lot from it. The community people will feel secure and have a sense of trust in the authority. Society and the governing body are like two sides of a coin- they both need each other. Both rely on each other and need to work with each other, and answering questions and grievances forms the fundamental duty of the authority. A ruling power cannot function without the support of the people they are working for, and without a governing body, a society is like a body without a backbone.

We live in an era where democracy and freedom of speech remain the main principles in many nations. Living in a society, we are concerned about our authority and how they work so that there is no dictatorship. The point is whether 'The well-being of a society is enhanced when many people question authority?' From my perspective, it is worth it when people participate when the authority takes any decision for the well-being of society. Also, sometimes even if they are not. The ordinary people choose its jurisdiction, and hence it is okay when they ask the authority some questions. That might clear the air regarding any confusion. To conclude, it is essential and beneficial when people ask social questions from time to time for society's well-being. However, we need to keep in mind that not every time the questioning will be effective. Yet we have the right to ask, and the authority ought to answer us or sometimes may not answer. The authority represents the people of the society, and hence they represent the society everywhere. Therefore, when people feel that something is misleading or irrelevant, they may ask the Government and have a clear understanding of it. It will also help in the betterment of society.