GRE argument essay tests the writing proficiency of candidates through an essay. GRE argument sample essay - Quiot manufacturing focuses on how the memo assumes the functional atmosphere of Panoply Industries and Quiot Manufacturing are similar.

Candidates need to focus on finding the flaws of the argument and write supporting points with relevant examples. Candidates will find similar topics in GRE writing practice papers.

Topic: Quiot Manufacturing

The argument stated in the memo by the Vice President on the accelerating rate of on-the-job accidents is based on assumptions, and is not the only available solution. Various other factors that directly/ indirectly influence the safety of the workers and their work environment are neglected in this memo. The reasoning requires a more logical and reliable study of the problem.

The memo assumes Quiot manufacturing to have a similar functional atmosphere as that of Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are less by an hour than the former and have 30% fewer accidents. This is a plausible comparison only if their operations are similar. That is the machines, work environment, number of workers, and goods they handle. It is certain that an industry dealing with heavy machines, hazardous chemicals, objects is more exposed to accidents than the industries dealing with toys, beverages, instant food, etc.

Also Check:

The differences between the two organizations and their outputs are what call for deciding the work shift period. Shortening the working period may further lead to a dip in production if the other factors that cause the issues pertain. It is also assumed that reducing accidents will lead to an increase in productivity. It may or may not occur, but reducing the working hours will curb the speed of work, on the whole, thus the efficiency of the results also goes down.

The argument claiming an increase in accidents fails to provide us the exact nature of these accidents and the safety precautions employed by the management. Design of the buildings, machine control, electrical and fire are some major contributing factors for accidents apart from the claimed fatigue and sleep deprivation among workers. Even if the working hours are reduced there is no guarantee that the employees would use it to get enough sleep. The management doesn't have the power to condition the activities of the workers once they're out of the factory. Otherwise, it would be invading their privacy. The company should be considerate of prevention from overworking and exploitation of manpower, but it isn't pragmatic to infer their workers' sleep cycle.

The memo also states about the experts, whose nature and status of study on the case is unclear. The memo's unwarranted assumption deals only with one out of the many aspects that pertain to this case.

In the light of all these considerations, the statement that associates on-the-job accidents with sleep deprivation as a prominent factor is weakened. For example, the memo mentions 'three work shifts' which may span during the day and the night. Thus, workers at night are subjected to more risks than during the day. Inclusively reducing the work shift by an hour is not advisable. Nor may this ensure the workers get enough sleep.

A thorough study considering all applicable factors is necessary to understand the core of the problems that are causing these accidents. Thus, reducing work hours might not give a positive result in improving the production rate nor minimizing accidents as a whole.