GRE Analyse an Issue article assesses the critical thought process of the candidate and how well one can express it through writing. In GRE Analyze an issue essay on an issue you need to write around 500-600 words. The common topics are of general interest which can be discussed from various perspectives.

GRE AWA practice papers will also help in grabbing different topics around GRE AWA.

Topic: Passionate Interest

In our long historical journey, our society is actually driven by great ideas from different fields. As a result, someone claims that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. From my perspective, it is undeniably true that impassioned interest in our surrounding worlds inspires our innovation and further helps us build up great ideas. However, this doesn't mean that merely relying on interests is inclined to incubate great ideas. It is also worth pointing out that if and only if possessing comprehensive knowledge and perspicacity for happenings in the world, we can generate valuable opinions and make them come into effect.

Before going further with the discussion, it is necessary to clarify what the so-called best idea means. In my humble view, the most characteristic of the best ideas is those which could have a profound influence on society and serve as an essential component for us. In other ways, they should help solve our current issues or elevate our understanding of the world to a brand-new level. With this brief summary, we can start with our discussion of what actually leads to great ideas.

However, someone may reject my idea. They might argue that our passionate interests provide the most important concept and serve as the unique foundation of great ideas. For supporting examples, they might no further resort to great inventions in diverse fields, which firmly sprung from vehement interests for creators. One pervasive example could be Bill Gates and his fanatic interest in software development. Since the first time of getting touch with computers and programming, Bill had been deeply enamored with such fanatical digital world and therefore cultivated his ambition that someday every family could possess a personal computer equipped with his computer system. It is through his unprecedented interest in software development and dream to facilitate everyone that Microsoft company comes into being and still plays dominant roles in our current world. However, poring over Bill's case carefully, I tend to argue that interest is able to incubate our great idea, but doesn't equate with all necessities of a great idea. Because only the ideas that play a significant role in our practice could be considered as great, which requires sufficient knowledge to facilitate their realization.

Also Check:

Expanding our example of Bill, we shouldn't deny the fact that his prodigious programming skills enabled him to make his software dream become actual code and ultimately accumulated into the Windows system. Without his proficient knowledge of programming, all of his fascinated opinions could only become his personal wishful thinking.

Additionally, opposition to my viewpoint might come from the fact that the majority of innovations in history are actually deep-rooted in our daily life. In this point of view, it is through realizing common requirements in our society that we can actually identify the right direction for our innovation. One such fundamental demands were extracted and put into practice, it would impact a large range of individuals as a result of its popularity. Therefore, recalling our definition of the best idea mentioned above, such achievement might be highly possible to be considered as great. Take the iPad's invention as an example. Since Steve Jobs found that a spate of complaints raised for the small size of the iPhone, which mainly relates to inconvenience for reading or editing, he recollected a group of geniuses from the iPhone team and targeted a more handy device fitting for reading. Without consideration for common desires based on the limitations of the iPhone, it is impossible for us to have a chance to get an iPad nowadays. However, it is Jobs' incisiveness for potential demand and relentless purpose with the perfection that drives him to catch up with such opportunity and make an endeavor to convert such requirement into real achievement. This well exemplifies that the commonplace couldn't be great without perspicacity to discover its value and unremitting effort to change ideas into practice. In this sense, only when we are capable of doing so can an opinion based on common requirements be smoothly considered as best.

In conclusion, while enthusiasm for our surrounding environment provides profound nutrients for new ideas, we shouldn't ignore the significance of both comprehensive knowledge and deep insights during their incubation. That is to say, without them, whatever seemingly great innovation ideas only stand on shabby ground and couldn't really facilitate the improvement of our society.

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how those considerations shape your position.

The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things if seen keenly and deeply. Though, many times incredible ideas come from a specialized study of unique things. But these too can be said to be ultimately coming from an interest in commonplace things!

A curious eye and a depth within oneself are two important ingredients of this passionate interest. An interest in commonplace things, even if they are approached passionately, can lead to interesting discoveries and inventions, but will remain only a surface appraisal of things if they are viewed without curiosity and depth. By curiosity, I mean curiosity about the fundamental ingredients. And, by depth, I mean an uncovering for the deeper, profound meaning of things. For instance, a passionate interest in cooking can produce delicious dishes, but it requires a level of depth in oneself to observe how the practice of cooking can be a meditation practice. Similarly, it requires a keen eye to question what happens to the vegetable waste after the cooking is complete. It is this sense of curiosity that can lead the mind to delve into the question of how the waste produced from cooking can be reused. This sense of curiosity combined with a concern for one’s environment can lead to the actual practice of vermicomposting. The idea of vermicomposting itself only requires curiosity about commonplace things.

This is not to say that ‘curiosity and depth’ cannot form a part of the passionate interest. Passionate interest can encompass these two important aspects of finding big ideas in commonplace things. The best example perhaps is that of the observation of an apple falling that led to the idea of gravity. Herein passionate interest about a simple event of an apple falling from the tree, fueled with a sense of curiosity that gave Einstein a keen eye as well as a level of depth in oneself that helped him connect a simple event to something larger, led to the big idea of gravity.

Another example of how passionate interest in commonplace things leads to big ideas is the idea of creating a new system of an economy by Professor Otto Scharmer. He simply observed that the present system of the economy is based on the assumption that humans are self-interested individuals, which in reality may or may not hold true. Thus, on the basis of an alternate view of human nature, which he borrowed from Eastern philosophies, he is attempting to create a new system altogether! This is one of the best examples of how simply observing that humans are not always self-interested in their personal life, led to the big idea of creating a new economic system.

On the basis of a scrutiny of the best ideas in the history of human civilization--be it the discovery of fire through an accident or the construction of the school of yoga from observation of the movements of life--one can say that passionate interest in commonplace things has been the source of origination of best ideas. However, some of the best ideas come from a specialized understanding of lesser-known things. This includes a spectrum of technology inventions, ranging from the invention of robots to highly specialized satellites, though even they can be said to have ultimately come from a keen and deep observation of commonplace things!

Score 6 Outstanding

In addressing the specific task directions, a 6 response presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the issue and conveys meaning skillfully.

A typical response in this category:

• articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
• develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
• sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
• conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates superior facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage, and mechanics), but may have minor errors

Score 5 Strong

In addressing the specific task directions, a 5 response presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed analysis of the issue and conveys meaning clearly.

A typical response in this category:

• presents a clear and well-considered position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
• develops the position with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples
• is focused and generally well organized, connecting ideas appropriately
• conveys ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English, but may have minor errors

Score 4 Adequate

In addressing the specific task directions, a 4 response presents a competent analysis of the issue and conveys meaning with acceptable clarity.

A typical response in this category:

• presents a clear position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
• develops the position with relevant reasons and/or examples
• is adequately focused and organized
• demonstrates sufficient control of language to express ideas with acceptable clarity
• generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English, but may have some errors

Score 3 Limited

A 3 response demonstrates some competence in addressing the specific task directions, in analyzing the issue, and in conveying meaning, but is obviously flawed.

A typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:

• is vague or limited in addressing the specific task directions and in presenting or developing a position on the issue or both
• is weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples or relies largely on unsupported claims
• is limited in focus and/or organization
• has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity
• contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning

Score 2 Seriously Flawed

A 2 response largely disregards the specific task directions and/or demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.

A typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:

• is unclear or seriously limited in addressing the specific task directions and in presenting or developing a position on the issue or both
• provides few, if any, relevant reasons or examples in support of its claims
• is poorly focused and/or poorly organized
• has serious problems in language and sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
• contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning

Score 1 Fundamentally Deficient

A 1 response demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing.

A typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:

• provides little or no evidence of understanding the issue
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to develop an organized response (e.g., is disorganized and/or extremely brief)
• has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
• contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence

Score 0

Off-topic (i.e., provides no evidence of an attempt to address the assigned topic), is in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible or nonverbal.