The GRE AWA section in the exam analyses candidates’ capacity to think logically and cohesively, as well as ability to communicate and support reasons. The GRE AWA becomes a crucial tool for demonstrating your critical thinking and analytical abilities. In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain sceptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust GRE Issue Essay is the topic in GRE AWA. The model answer for this has been given below. Candidates need to ensure that they are able to present their opinions clearly with valid reasons and examples.

Candidates can use the following structure in order to write their GRE Issue Essay:

Introduction: Students have to introduce the topic directly. Candidates need to evaluate the topic and present its opinion in support or against the given statement. Accordingly, the reasons that the candidate would present for its opinion needs to be stated briefly in this paragraph. Further, the potential instances that would be used by the candidate to support the reasons need to be mentioned here.
Body Paragraph 1: One has to state his or her position about the topic clearly here. The strongest example can be stated which will be helpful to make a clear understanding and carry forward the other parts of the essay. Based on the given topic of this GRE Analyse an Issue essay, candidates need to use their reason that clearly evaluates their opinion.
Body Paragraph 2: Candidates need to give real life examples in this paragraph as well. Candidates need to ensure that their second reason is supported with examples which have real life value and are not vague.
Final Paragraph: Here a student has to write why he chose those examples and how it is relevant to support his own stand. The final paragraph should state the topic and provide the third reason for the opinion. Accordingly, the reasons for the final paragraph need to prove that the given issue for the essay topic is wrong.
Conclusion: In this last paragraph the student should make a contrast and show that his argument is right, and the given topic is wrong. After stating proper reasons he has to write clearly his stand again and conclude the essay.

Making use of the structure of the issue essay, candidates would be able to effectively present the essay with their views and opinions. In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust. GRE Issue Essay should be written based on proper tactics. For this issue essay one can use these strategies to write a well planned essay. The strategies :

• It is important for stating relevancy of the topic and taking a clear stand about the topic. Accordingly, candidates should state their chosen opinion while introducing the essay and stick to it entirely. Unlike the GRE Analyse an Argument, candidates need to provide their opinion and not refute the given argument.
• Giving relevant, real life experience is very important. No assumption can be used here as examples. Candidates should provide their examples which are not vague hence, using real-life examples is suggested.
• Clarification of the stand must be stated clearly and briefly. Using cause and effect patterns can be helpful. It will be a clear understanding of the example which would help in validating the opinion of the candidate better.
• Contrasting with the topic and proving that topic wrong is a good step to conclude the essay. Candidates should ensure that in their concluding paragraph, they restate the topic of the essay and the opinion of the candidates. This should be followed by briefly stating the reasons and concluding that the given statement is wrong.

Read More GRE Issue Samples

Topic: In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain sceptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust in the GRE Issue Essay. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Model Answer

The given statement claims that “In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain sceptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.” which I certainly refute. It's important to strike a balance. Business, education, and government all play critical roles in the nation's flourishing growth and peaceful governance. Many outstanding personalities have brought about huge change in these fields as a result of the changing and ever increasing expectations of people. They are famous globally for their remarkable work. Whether it is reasonable to be cautious of new leaders in industry, education, and government until they demonstrate their trustworthiness. It is a thought that requires careful consideration.

A person's past can create an irrelevant image of the new leader, blocking a true and honest evaluation of his leadership abilities. Elon Musk, for example, is a well-known entrepreneur, engineer, and founder of international corporations such as Tesla and SpaceX. He did, however, have to put in a lot of effort to become a successful person. But, when he became the CEO of Tesla, he had numerous challenges. The firm's stock was decreasing at an exponential rate, and the company was on the verge of bankruptcy. As a result, people began to doubt his abilities and believe Tesla was a failure. Yet, he did not give up and believed in his vision, and he made incredible progress in the field of electric cars, which wowed people all over the world. Because of the public's trust, electric car sales soared, and the company's stock market valuation is among the highest in the world. It is true that people are wary of new leaders in order to feel more secure. To feel secure, people need to perceive a new leader's trustworthiness. People should, however, trust the leader more than anything else within the limitations of control. To begin with, this is because, in many cases, leaders have proved good performance in the prior job in order to be promoted to the current role.

Second, many people believe that the cost of waiting until a leader exhibits trustworthy traits is larger than the cost of a new leader making mistakes. This is especially true in situations where the consequences are widespread. Take, for example, education. Assume that the president of a university wishes to implement a new policy to increase the number of students who look for work after graduation. The impact of this policy will not be assessed until the students have graduated in three/four years. Each year the policy is in force, students may experience a year of delay.

A little scepticism, however, can result in astonishingly positive outcomes when executed well.

It is critical for leaders to have the trust of the people they lead, whether they be students, employees, or residents of a country. Clearly, a leader whose authority and abilities are continually questioned cannot effectively lead his or her people. In fact, if people suspect their leaders of ability with a high level of scepticism, they will automatically restrict them from expressing themselves.

There are two sides to every coin. Being sceptical or not - it’s one’s choice. However, too much scepticism or lack of scepticism comes with its own set of repercussions. Scepticism is a tool for evaluating a leader and determining whether or not he or she is trustworthy. This is especially true when it comes to inexperienced leaders. Regardless, it's important not to forget that trust is a critical component of the leader-follower connection. Being overly doubtful could damage everything and severely impede the leader's efforts.