GRE Analyze an Argument examines your ability to understand and analyze the arguments, evaluating them in the form of an essay. GRE analyze an argument question containing a brief passage describing a course of events. You need to write an essay of 500-600 words and finish GRE analytical writing in 30 minutes.

Go through the GRE practice papers for furthermore practice.

ARGUMENT:

A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.

Answer:

The debater proposed a conclusion that opening a new Bay City restaurant that makes a specialty of seafood can be both profitable and popular. The debater stated two facts along with evidence-based studies in support of the argument which he mentioned in the above-mentioned statements.

The first claim made is about the consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants which has increased in the past five years, but there are no restaurants in Bay City that specialize in seafood. The second claim made is about the majority of the families in Bay City being two-income families and also the results of a nationwide survey have indicated that two-income families are concerned about their lifestyle and eating habits as they have shown a tendency to eat from outside rather than home-cooked meals. However, the claims conferred by the debater are inadequate to prove that a new Bay City restaurant concentrating on seafood would be popular and profitable as it fails to state figures and data about the outcome of this argument. Not a survey report has been reported before making such a tall claim about the residents of the bay city. The conclusion appears to be an assumption or an opinion rather than a fact-based study.

Also, Check

It is hard to believe that a city doesn't have a restaurant that doesn't serve seafood despite having a large consumer. The fact that there are no seafood restaurants in Bay City, despite the increment in the consumption of seafood, doesn't necessarily mean that a restaurant specializing in seafood would be popular and profitable. Other important factors can't be overlooked and an appropriate set of parameters should be concluded before drawing such a conclusion. Firstly, the increment in consumption by thirty percent is insignificantly seeable of the very fact that this went on for 5 years. However, restaurants with seafood dishes have flooded the city if people were interested in dining at one. The bay city must have abundant seafood resources to be consumed largely by the residents. It should be a sea-faced city with many tourists visiting the city and the argument that the city can be secluded and deprived of resources doesn't stand. Hence, It fails to make any sense. Moreover, the restaurants that serve seafood dishes would have diversified into separate restaurants for serving seafood dishes only, if there was a large demand for the same. The fact that these restaurants are continuing to serve seafood dishes additionally to other dishes proves that these restaurants aren't making much profit from the consumption of seafood. One can speculate that there might be other restaurants serving seafood dishes at their place.

Additionally, likely, the rise in consumption isn't just for the seafood, but also the opposite dishes being served by popular restaurants. People are also visiting these restaurants because they like their preparation of the atmosphere. It's highly unlikely that they'll stop going to their favorite restaurants to dine at a replacement restaurant that serves only seafood. Therefore, the new restaurant should compete with the other restaurants that are already popular in Bay City and which offer other dishes additionally to seafood dishes. The new restaurant might not be able to make a profit unless it's able to build up a sizable clientage, which seems unlikely because of the above-mentioned aspects related to dining in Bay City restaurants.

The arguer fails to provide substantial evidence to prove the relevance of the nationwide survey within the context of the two-income families residing in Bay City. There's no mention of the variety of lifestyles that they follow that permits them to dine out regularly. The families in Bay City don't seem to be as interested in eating out as others like their counterparts in bigger cities. Moreover, if the families are health conscious, then they would not like to dine in a new restaurant as they might doubt the standard of food being served and they would have liked to eat from the restaurant for whom they have developed a taste and tongue in the past. Therefore, the arguer fails to provide a link between the nationwide survey and the dining habits of the two-income families of Bay City to substantiate his recommendation.

The argument failed to express a well-researched data-based study about seafood dishes and restaurants which has been portrayed as being liked by the people of the bay city. Moreover, the profits earned by a restaurant rely upon the initial investments along with the expenses incurred within the maintenance of the restaurant. Several parameters need to be scrutinized before making progress towards initiating an unexercised experiment in the business of a restaurant. The arguer does not provide information associated with such data. Therefore, the argument fails to convince the reader that a new Bay City restaurant specializing in seafood is profitable and popular.