University Hospitals AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

University Hospitals AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.
In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mentionthe kind of care provided at university hospitals is lower than that at different kinds of medical clinics. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper:

“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make a far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this, it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The argument claims that the kind of care provided at university hospitals is lower than that at different kinds of medical clinics. This conclusion depends on the reason that the university hospitals in the newspaper's area have very few doctors, have less success rate in treating patients, make less benefit, and pay their staff very little. Not particularly does the author forget to define what establishes a decent quality of care, however, he additionally puts together his claim that has practically zero connection with the treatment quality that a hospital provides. There are a few suspicions that may not be basically applied to this argument. Henceforth, the contention is frail and has a few defects.

First, the author suspects that the way that numerous specialists at the university hospitals split their time between educating, researching, and treating patients negatively affects the quality of care at the hospitals. This supposition is inadequate since ongoing review results show that 95% of the doctors, who give their time to research, teach, and treat patients, are superior to the doctors who are not. Thus, it appears to be that the way that the doctors in university hospitals, who split their time between different practices, positively affects the quality of care at university hospitals.

Second, the argument readily assumes that fewer doctors at university hospitals negatively affect the quality of care at college medical clinics. Fewer doctors working in a university hospital don't really imply that the hospital provides bad quality. This probably won't be thus, as the argument neglects to consider that the explanation that the university hospitals have fewer doctors is because it keeps a proportion of 1 doctor to 5 patients. As per this policy, the university hospital guarantees high-quality care. The experience, knowledge, expertise, and different variables of every individual doctor are totally neglected in a particularly simple assessment. If the author thought about one of these components in his statement, the argument may have been more solid.

Finally, it is recognized that the necessary factor which determines if the hospital provides quality of care is proportionate to patients. The excellent hospitals have a proportion of 1 doctor to 10 patients or less. To strengthen the argument the author should have provided appropriate information about the number of medical caretakers employed by the university hospitals. If it shows that the doctors to patients ratio at the university hospital is higher than 1 to 10, it could work to strengthen the discussion.

Moreover, the author uses economic statistics, like salary, and profit evidently shows his absence of comprehension of what the key success elements of a hospital really are. In spite of the fact that the university hospitals need to stay profitable to keep on working. There is little relationship between the productivity of a hospital and the number of patients that are treated, recovered, and helped by the staff at that hospital. There are quite a few factors that could influence the benefit of a hospital or of any activity. For example, the area where it works and the taxes it pays in, the expense of utilities and other overhead that are not under the hospital's control, to the pay rates of both the medical and non-medical staff utilized at the hospital.

In conclusion, it is doubtful that any of these things have an immediate relationship with the quality of care at a university hospital or a private hospital. The argument is flawed and has several defects. To make the argument stronger the author should have provided enough supportive evidence to support it.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

University Hospitals AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER