Reading Passage Question
Two impressive studies have reexamined Eric Williams’ conclusion that Britain’s abolition of the slave trade in 1807 and its emancipation of slaves in its colonies in 1834 were driven primarily by economic (5) rather than humanitarian motives. Blighted by depleted soil, indebtedness, and the inefficiency of coerced labor, these colonies, according to Williams, had by 1807 become an impediment to British economic progress.
(10) Seymour Drescher provides a more balanced view. Rejecting interpretations based either on economic interest or the moral vision of abolitionists, Drescher has reconstructed the populist characteristics of British abolitionism, which appears to have cut across lines of (15) class, party, and religion. Noting that between 1780 and 1830 antislavery petitions outnumbered those on any other issue, including parliamentary reform, Drescher concludes that such support cannot be explained by economic interest alone, especially when (20) much of it came from the unenfranchised masses. Yet, aside from demonstrating that such support must have resulted at least in part from widespread literacy and a tradition of political activism, Drescher does not finally explain how England, a nation deeply divided by class (25) struggles, could mobilize popular support for antislavery measures proposed by otherwise conservative politicians in the House of Lords and approved there with little dissent.
David Eltis’ answer to that question actually (30) supports some of Williams’ insights. Eschewing Drescher’s idealization of British traditions of liberty, Eltis points to continuing use of low wages and Draconian vagrancy laws in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to ensure the industriousness of (35) British workers. Indeed, certain notables even called for the enslavement of unemployed laborers who roamed the British countryside—an acceptance of coerced labor that Eltis attributes to a preindustrial desire to keep labor costs low and exports competitive. (40) By the late eighteenth century, however, a growing home market began to alert capitalists to the importance of “want creation” and to incentives such as higher wages as a means of increasing both worker productivity and the number of consumers. (45) Significantly, it was products grown by slaves, such as sugar, coffee, and tobacco, that stimulated new wants at all levels of British society and were the forerunners of products intended in modern capitalist societies to satisfy what Eltis describes as “nonsubsistence or (50) psychological needs.” Eltis concludes that in an economy that had begun to rely on voluntary labor to satisfy such needs, forced labor necessarily began to appear both inappropriate and counterproductive to employers. Eltis thus concludes that, while Williams (55) may well have underestimated the economic viability of the British colonies employing forced labor in the early 1800s, his insight into the economic motives for abolition was partly accurate. British leaders became committed to colonial labor reform only when they (60) became convinced, for reasons other than those cited by Williams, that free labor was more beneficial to the imperial economy.
“Two impressive studies have reexamined Eric Williams’ conclusion that Britain’s abolition”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
Question 1
Which one of the following best describes the main idea of the passage?
(A) Although they disagree about the degree to which economic motives influenced Britain’s abolition of slavery, Drescher and Eltis both concede that moral persuasion by abolitionists was a significant factor.
(B) Although both Drescher and Eltis have questioned Williams’ analysis of the motivation behind Britain’s abolition of slavery, there is support for part of Williams’ conclusion.
(C) Because he has taken into account the populist characteristics of British abolitionism, Drescher’s explanation of what motivated Britain’s abolition of slavery is finally more persuasive than that of Eltis.
(D) Neither Eltis nor Drescher has succeeded in explaining why support for Britain’s abolition of slavery appears to have cut across lines of party, class, and religion.
(E) Although flawed in certain respects, Williams’ conclusions regarding the economic condition of British slave colonies early in the nineteenth century have been largely vindicated.
Answer: B
Explanation: The author’s purpose is to describe two competing views of Williams’ conclusion about why the British abolished slavery. His specific main idea is that Williams’ conclusion is partly accurate. Despite the fact that both Seymour Drescher and David Eltis take issue with it.
Paragraph 1 provides Williams’ view, which is that the British abolished slavery primarily for economic reasons. Paragraph 2 provides Drescher’s dissenting view, which emphasizes British populism as the primary cause for the demise of British slavery. Finally, paragraph 3 provides Eltis’ view, which also emphasizes economics as the primary cause behind the end of British slavery. However, while Williams emphasizes the economic decline of Britain’s colonies as the principal motivation for doing away with slavery. Eltis emphasizes the newfound importance of free labor as the principal motivation for getting rid of slavery.
Question 2
It can be inferred that Eltis cites the views of “certain notables” (line 35) in order to
(A) support the claim that British traditions of liberty were not as strong as Drescher believed them to be
(B) support the contention that a strong labour force was important to Britain’s economy
(C) emphasize the importance of slavery as an institution in preindustrial Britain
(D) indicate that the laboring classes provided little support for the abolition of slavery
(E) establish that laborers in preindustrial Britain had few civil rights
Answer: A
Explanation: Eltis refers to the desire of certain notables to enslave unemployed laborers in order to point out that, contrary to Drescher’s belief. The British did not abolish slavery for reasons of principle. The British, in Eltis’ view, made decisions based on economic interests. Slavery was abolished when it proved to be harmful to the state’s economic interests.
Questuion 3
Which one of the following best states Williams’ views of the primary reason for Britain’s abolition of the slave trade and the emancipation of slaves in its colonies?
(A) British populism appealed to people of varied classes, parties, and religions.
(B) Both capitalists and workers in Britain accepted the moral precepts of abolitionists.
(C) Forced labor in the colonies could not produce enough goods to satisfy British consumers.
(D) The operation of colonies based on forced labour was no longer economically advantageous.
(E) British workers became convinced that forced labor in the colonies prevented paid workers from receiving higher wages.
Answer: D
Explanation: Lines 5-9 provide Williams’ thinking about why the British abolished slavery. The colonies, with their slave labor system. As stated, "Blighted by depleted soil, indebtedness, and the inefficiency of coerced labor. These colonies, according to Williams, had by 1807 become an impediment to British economic progress."
Question 4
According to Eltis, low wages and Draconian vagrancy laws in Britain in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were intended to
(A) protect laborers against unscrupulous employment practices
(B) counter the move to enslave unemployed laborers
(C) ensure a cheap and productive work force
(D) ensure that the work force experienced no unemployment
(E) ensure that products produced in British colonies employing forced labor could compete effectively with those produced in Britain
Answer: C
Explanation: Lines 32-35 say that low wages and Draconian vagrancy laws in pre-industrial Great Britain were intended “to ensure the industriousness of British workers” (lines 34-35). Choice (C) is an accurate paraphrase of this sentiment. (A), (B) Low wages and Draconian vagrancy laws were certainly not intended to help laborers. Just the reverse, in fact. They were intended to benefit employers. (D) and (E) fall outside the scope of the passage. The text doesn’t discuss either unemployment per se, (D), or economic competition between Great Britain and its colonies, (E).
Question 5
It can be inferred that the author of the passage views Drescher’s presentation of British traditions concerning liberty as
(A) accurately stated
(B) somewhat unrealistic
(C) carefully researched
(D) unnecessarily tentative
(E) superficially convincing
Answer: B
Explanation: As mentioned, "Drescher does not finally explain how England, a nation deeply divided by class struggles, could mobilize popular support for antislavery measures. Proposed by otherwise conservative politicians in the House of Lords and approved there with little dissent." In line 31, the author notes that Drescher’s presentation of British traditions concerning liberty is “idealized,” or romanticized. The phrase “somewhat unrealistic” reflects this characterization.
Question 6
The information in the passage suggests that Eltis and Drescher agree that
(A) people of all classes in Britain supported the abolition of slavery
(B) the motives behind Britain’s abolition of slavery were primarily economic
(C) the moral vision of abolitionists played a vital part in Britain’s abolition of slavery
(D) British traditions of liberty have been idealized by historians
(E) Britain’s tradition of political activism was primarily responsible for Britain’s abolition of slavery
Answer: A
Explanation: Lines 15-28 reveal that Drescher believes that opposition to slavery among the British was broad-based. That Eltis also believes that opposition to slavery was broad-based can be inferred from his research emphasis. Which shows that the British elite moved away from supporting the slave system because the British consumer wanted to obtain more and better goods.
Question 7
According to the passage, Eltis argues against which one of the following contentions?
(A) Popular support for antislavery measures existed in Britain in the early nineteenth century.
(B) In the early nineteenth century, colonies that employed forced labor were still economically viable.
(C) British views concerning personal liberty motivated nineteenth-century British opposition to slavery.
(D) Widespread literacy in Britain contributed to public opposition to slavery in the early nineteenth century.
(E) Antislavery measures proposed by conservative politicians in the early nineteenth century met with little opposition
Answer: C
Explanation: Option A is somewhere correct as he does agree with it, but that doesn’t make it the right choice. He doesn't argue against option B. He states that the highest productivity was associated with voluntary labor. Option D can be ruled out as he agrees to the statement. Hence incorrect Option E can be ruled out too. He probably agrees to it. Hence incorrect. Option C is correct. Personal liberty was not the real reason. The real reason is that voluntary labor was more productive than coerced labor. Refer to the last lines. Hence correct.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
- The extent of a nation’s power over its coastal ecosystems and the natural resources GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Deontological Pacifism decrees that moral agents have an absolute duty GMAT Reading Comprehension
- According to Wimsatt and Beardsley, even though the influence of the author’s ‘intention’ upon the critic’s opinion GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The impressionist painters expressly disavowed any interest in philosophy GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form of the novel GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The ―paradox of tolerance‖ admonishes us that tolerance of the intolerant leads to intolerance. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Initially the Vinaver theory that Malory’s eight romances, once thought to be fundamentally unified GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Perceiving, for all its nicety of functioning in the dark room under strict instructions for accuracy GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Anthropologist Ralph Linton, in categorizing Native American movements GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Surprisingly enough, modern historians have rarely interested themselves GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Art is visible. However, everything one sees is filtered through certain conditions GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In his 1976 study of slavery in the United States, Herbert Gutman GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Great comic art is never otherwordly, it does not seek to mystify us GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Early models of the geography of the metropolis were unicellular GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Many Native Americans view the archaeological excavation and museum display of ancestral skeletal GMAT Reading Comprehension
- With their recognition of Maxine Hong Kingston as a major literary figure GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In 1964 the United States federal government began attempts to eliminate racial discrimination in employment and wages GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The phenomenon of college basketball's surging popularity remains a challenge to classify GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The sole use and sole object of existence is enjoyment or pleasure, which two words will here be treated as synonymous GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments