
bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero
Reading Passage Question:
The terms "informed" and "patient's consent" were perhaps first coupled in the 1957 case of Salgo versus Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees. The plaintiff, paralyzed after myelography, had not been informed by his doctor that paralysis was a possible risk of this procedure. He won although the doctor had committed no mistake because the doctor failed in his duty of disclosure. The court found that if the patient had been properly informed he would have refused myelography.
From a legal perspective, any consent, if it is to be valid, has to meet three independent preconditions, all of which have to be taken into account simultaneously. Consent may be deemed invalid if it has been obtained by deception or coercion; if it does not comply with formal procedures; or if the person lacks the capacity to consent by virtue of mental illness. The weaker a patient's personal competence, the more stringent the procedural considerations must be. This is to avoid coercion or exploitation, and to ensure that the disclosure of information has taken into account the patient's capacity for understanding and evaluating the situation.
Equally, certain radical medical procedures call for stringent requirements to be met on personal and procedural competence. Such preconditions may be specifically formulated, as in Norway's abortion, sterilization, and transplantation legislation. These preconditions reflect a general principle of international health law, illustrated by the 1973 US case of Kaimowitz vs Michigan Department of Mental Health. Here the court found that even though a difficult psychiatric patient possessed the competence required to consent to ordinary surgical procedures, and even to "accepted neurosurgical procedures", his competence would not be sufficient for him to consent to experimental neurosurgical procedures characterized as "dangerous, intrusive, irreversible, and of uncertain benefit to the patient and the society".
The requirement for informed and voluntary consent is not always applicable to noninvasive medical procedures. In most cases, staff should be able to decide on the necessary procedures without having the patient's express consent, after having provided information to the patient. They must, however, respect a patient's s rejection of any specific examinations or treatments. When the treatment offered is invasive, the doctor will have the responsibility for providing the patient with all necessary information--about the risks and the alternative treatments and their probable consequences.
‘The terms "informed" and "patient's consent" were perhaps’’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions.
The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analysing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Questions and Solutions
- According to the passage, when a treatment is invasive,
(A) difficult psychiatric patients cannot consent to ordinary surgical procedures, and even to "accepted neurosurgical procedures”
(B) difficult psychiatric patients must have a family member give written consent for any surgical procedures.
(C) the patient’s express consent is necessary and it is the doctor’s responsibility to obtain it from the patient after he or she has received all the necessary information
(D) the patient’s express consent is necessary and it is the staff’s responsibility to obtain it from the patient after he or she has received all the necessary information
(E) the patient’s express consent is if the patient has received all the necessary information about the risks and the alternative treatments and their probable consequences.
Answer: C
Explanation: The clarity of logic in this passage is excellent, and there are no problems with the OAs. This is a relatively clear passage. Having said that, since this is a query pertaining to a particular aim. It is possible that we will need to study the relevant text once again. The passage that follows is the one that is most pertinent to this inquiry. "When the treatment..... possible repercussions." The best option here is option C.
- Which of the following, most accurately states the purpose of the passage?
(A) To compare two different approaches to the question of consent.
(B) To summarize two court cases regarding the question of informed consent.
(C) To argue for a particular interpretation of the term “informed consent”.
(D) To cite examples of how the notion of informed consent has been abused by medical staff working with psychiatric patients.
(E) To discuss the notion of informed consent, its history and some variations on how the term is applied.
Answer: E
Explanation: A is incorrect since the passage does not contain tonalities that are shared by two distinct approaches. Option E is the one that should be selected.
Para 1:The "concept of informed consent" is introduced in the first paragraph.
Para 2: Historic details
There is potential for some variety and legal intricacy in the third paragraph.
Para 4: Conclusion
- It can be inferred from the passage that prior to 1957
(A) doctors were allowed to continue performing the potentially dangerous myelography procedure
(B) doctors were allowed to continue performing the potentially dangerous myelography procedure without the patient’s consent.
(C) doctors were not allowed to neglect informing their staff of the dangers of a medical procedure and the alternatives that exist.
(D) doctors were not required by law to inform their patients of the dangers of a medical procedure and the alternatives that exist.
(E) doctors were required by law to inform their patients of the dangers of a medical procedure and the alternatives that exist.
Answer: C
Explanation: This is a simple question, and it will be even simpler if you have strong CR abilities. Simply reading the first paragraph, on which this question is based, will allow you to arrive at the correct response in a short amount of time. It is vital to take note of the phrase "mandated by law" here; this choice is true according to the first paragraph, thus you should keep it. The correct answer is choice C.
- Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about Norway’s abortion legislation?
(A) Abortion legislation in Norway requires that the patient sign a special consent form that is different from the general consent form required for other medical procedures.
(B) Abortion legislation in Norway does not require that the patient sign a consent form because the patient is assumed to have personal and procedural competence.
(C) Abortion legislation in Norway does require the patient to sign a consent form only when the attending physician believes the patient lacks personal and procedural competence.
(D) Abortion legislation in Norway require the patient to sign a consent form only even when the attending physician believes the patient lacks personal and procedural competence.
(E) Legislation in Norway requires the patient to sign a consent form only when a procedure is not intrusive so the law does not deal with abortion.
Answer: A
Explanation: According to what is said in the paragraph, "Equally, certain...........and transplantation legislation." Option A is the one to pick because it presents the information in an understandable manner and places a premium on procedural competence. They have provided additional information regarding the patients' capability to understand personally. The procedural competence, as well as its documentation, which has been specially formed in the remaining treatment alternatives.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions
- Antonia Castañeda has Utilised Scholarship from Women's Studies and Mexican-American History to Examine Nineteenth-Century Literary Portrayals of Mexican Women. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- By 1950, The Results of Attempts to Relate Brain Processes to Mental Experience Appeared Rather Discouraging GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In February 1848 the People of Paris Rose in Revolt Against the Constitutional Monarchy of Louis-Philippe GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Over the Last 150 Years, Large Stretches of Salmon Habitat have been Eliminated by Human Activity. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Brain Contributes to the Adaptive Success of Animals through the Control and Coordination of Muscle Contractions. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Geology of the Grand Canyon Area Exposes One of the Most Complete and Studied Sequences of Rock on Earth. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Pioneers of the Teaching of Science Imagined that its Introduction into Education would Remove the Conventionality, Artificiality, and Backward-Lookingness GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Single-Celled Parasite known as Toxoplasma Gondii Infects more than Half of the World's Human Population GMAT Reading Comprehension
- During the Victorian Period, Women Writers were Measured Against A Social GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In Current Historiography, the Picture of a Consistent, Unequivocal Decline in Women’s Status GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Resin is a Plant Secretion that Hardens when Exposed to Air GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Some Historians Contend that Conditions in the United States During the Second World War GMAT Reading Comprehension
- It Was Once Assumed that All Living Things Could be Divided into Two Fundamental and Exhaustive Categories GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A Fundamental Principle of Pharmacology is that all Drugs have Multiple Actions. Actions that are Desirable in the Treatment of Disease are Considered therapeutic GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Scepticism is as Much the Result of Knowledge, as Knowledge is of Scepticism. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- On the surface, the Conquest of the Aztec Empire by Herman Cortes GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A One-Child Policy was Implemented in China in 1979 GMAT Reading Comprehension
- But Man is Not Destined to Vanish. He can be Killed, but he cannot be Destroyed, Because his Soul is Deathless and his Spirit is Irrepressible. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Coral Reefs Are One of the Most Fragile, Biologically Complex, And Diverse Marine Ecosystems on Earth GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Although Numbers of Animals in a Given Region May Fluctuate From Year to Year GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments