The Stated Goal of the Government's Funding Program for the Arts is to GMAT Critical Reasoning

Question: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?

(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
(D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding.
(E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.

“The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to”- is a GMAT critical reasoning topic. This GMAT Critical Reasoning topic has been taken from the book ‘The Official Guide for GMAT Review.’

This GMAT critical comes with five options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. Candidates get 65 minutes to answer 36 MCQ questions in the critical reasoning section of the GMAT.

Answer: E
Explanation
:
As stated, the government's arts funding programme aims to promote excellent art. Senator Beton claims that because artists, like anybody who takes financial support. They would eventually try to please those who oversee the distribution of that support. Government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent aesthetic conscience of the artist. Therefore, government support for the arts not only burdens tax payers but also prevents the production of truly excellent works of art.

It is asked which of the options is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based. The assumptions are substantially supported by Option E. Let's discuss about.

Option A
Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.- Incorrect. This is not the point. However strongly the majority of taxpayers feel it is irrelevant. There is no room for the "interest of taxpayers."

Option B
Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.- Incorrect. The assumption is not that. The same holds true for additional financial financing. This contrast was never brought up.

Option C
Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.- Incorrect. No, it can't be the case. The Senator is not required to hold that there is broad agreement over what constitutes aesthetic excellence. In order to assert that government-funded works do not meet that criteria. In addition to everything said, "the distribution of funding" is based on a broad agreement of excellence.

Option D

Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding.- Incorrect. The only thing that was expressed in the statement was that supported artists will make an effort to appease them. The Senator has no justification for making such a broad, excessive assertion. The Senator need only presume as much if an artist started to accept government funding after producing works of genuine excellence. The following pieces of art would no longer be genuinely remarkable.

Option E

A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.- Correct. It fills the space between the main conclusion and the subsidiary conclusion. This links the topic under discussion.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show