
bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero
Reading Passage Question
The recognition of exclusive chattels and estate has really harmed and obscured Individualism. It has led Individualism entirely astray. It has made gain, not growth, its aim, so that man has thought that the important thing is to have, and has not come to know that the important thing is to be. The true perfection of man lies, not in what man has, but in what man is.
This state has crushed true Individualism, and set up an Individualism that is false. It has debarred one part of the community from being individual by starving them. It has debarred the other part of the community from being individual by putting them on the wrong road and encumbering them. Indeed, so completely has man's personality been absorbed by his trinkets and entanglements that the law has always treated offenses against a man‘s property with far more severity than offenses against his person.
It is clear that no authoritarian socialism will do. For while under the present system a very large number of people can lead lives of a certain amount of freedom and expression and happiness, under an industrial barrack system, or a system of economic tyranny, nobody would be able to have any such freedom at all. It is to be regretted that a portion of our community should be practically in slavery, but to propose to solve the problem by enslaving the entire community is childish. Every man must be left quite free to choose his own work.
No form of compulsion must be exercised over him. If there is, his work will not be good for him, will not be good in itself, and will not be good for others. I hardly think that any socialist, nowadays, would seriously propose that an inspector should call every morning at each house to see that each citizen rose up and did manual labour for eight hours. Humanity has got beyond that stage, and reserves such a form of life for the people whom, in a very arbitrary manner, it chooses to call criminals.
Many of the socialistic views that I have come across seem to me to be tainted with ideas of authority, if not of actual compulsion. Of course, authority and compulsion are out of the question. All association must be quite voluntary. It is only in voluntary associations that man is fine. It may be asked how Individualism, which is now more or less dependent on the existence of private property for its development, will benefit by the abolition of such private property. The answer is very simple. It is true that, under existing conditions, a few men who have had private means of their own, such as Byron, Shelley, Browning, Victor Hugo, Baudelaire, and others, have been able to realize their personality, more or less completely.
Not one of these men ever did a single day‘s work for hire. They were relieved from poverty. They had an immense advantage. The question is whether it would be for the good of Individualism that such an advantage be taken away. Let us suppose that it is taken away. What happens then to Individualism? How will it benefit? Under the new conditions Individualism will be far freer, far finer, and far more intensified than it is now. I am not talking of the great imaginatively realized Individualism of such poets as I have mentioned, but of the great actual Individualism latent and potential in mankind generally.
‘The recognition of exclusive chattels and estate has really harmed’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions.
The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analysing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Questions and Solutions
- The author of the passage most likely mentions Byron, Shelly, Browning, Hugo, and Baudelaire in an effort to:
- give examples of the harmful effect of money on Individualism and art.
- call attention to the rarity of artistic genius.
- define what is meant by the phrase ―realize their personality.
- stress the importance of financial independence
- add credibility to his claims
Answer: D
Explanation: Where are these people referred to? Examine your map of paragraph 5. These were all people who were able to express themselves to the fullest extent possible due to their extreme wealth and lack of need for employment. Only (A) and (D) include money, and only (D) is consistent with the paragraph's main idea. D is the right answer.
- Which of the following would the author be most likely to consider an example of ―enslaving the entire community?
- South Africa under apartheid, where rights of citizenship were denied to the Black majority, and granted in full only to the White minority
- Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, where the urban population was forcibly deported to the countryside to perform agricultural labour
- Sweden under the Social Democrats, where all citizens pay high taxes to support extensive social programs
- I only
- II only
- I and II
- II and III
- I, II and III
Answer: B
Explanation: In what passages does the author employ the phrase referred to in the query? It is noted in Paragraph 4, where the author makes an argument against socialism through force. Look for decisions that demonstrate compelled socialism. Let's start with RN II, which has three options. This is an example of obligatory socialism because a portion of the population is required to undertake a particular type of job. Check out RN I: In this instance, segregation is the prescribed socialism. There is no indication that RN III is a form of forced socialism, but it does reflect socialism. The answer must be (B).
- Suppose for a moment that Baudelaire was actually not wealthy, and often had to work to earn money. What relevance would this information have to the arguments posed by the author within the passage?
- It would refute the author‘s claim that artists require independent wealth to create.
- It would refute the author‘s claim that poets are people who can realize their own personality.
- It would strengthen the author‘s claim that the acquisition of wealth leads Individualism astray.
- The central thesis of the passage would remain equally valid.
- It would strongly weaken the main argument made by the author in the passage
Answer: D
Explanation: If Baudelaire did have to work, the author's view of riches as a benefit to achieving uniqueness would be undermined. He is just one of six examples, so it wouldn't really weaken the argument much; the author would still have enough other examples to draw from. Outright refutations are the sole options that serve as weakeners, which has an excessively negative impact on the argument. However, it is obvious that the author's claim would not be strengthened by this information, therefore only (D) remains and is therefore valid.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions
- In Current Historiography, the Picture of a Consistent, Unequivocal Decline in Women’s Status GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Resin is a Plant Secretion that Hardens when Exposed to Air GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Some Historians Contend that Conditions in the United States During the Second World War GMAT Reading Comprehension
- It Was Once Assumed that All Living Things Could be Divided into Two Fundamental and Exhaustive Categories GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A Fundamental Principle of Pharmacology is that all Drugs have Multiple Actions. Actions that are Desirable in the Treatment of Disease are Considered therapeutic GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Scepticism is as Much the Result of Knowledge, as Knowledge is of Scepticism. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- On the surface, the Conquest of the Aztec Empire by Herman Cortes GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A One-Child Policy was Implemented in China in 1979 GMAT Reading Comprehension
- But Man is Not Destined to Vanish. He can be Killed, but he cannot be Destroyed, Because his Soul is Deathless and his Spirit is Irrepressible. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Coral Reefs Are One of the Most Fragile, Biologically Complex, And Diverse Marine Ecosystems on Earth GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Although Numbers of Animals in a Given Region May Fluctuate From Year to Year GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Antonia Castañeda has Utilised Scholarship from Women's Studies and Mexican-American History to Examine Nineteenth-Century Literary Portrayals of Mexican Women. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- By 1950, The Results of Attempts to Relate Brain Processes to Mental Experience Appeared Rather Discouraging GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In February 1848 the People of Paris Rose in Revolt Against the Constitutional Monarchy of Louis-Philippe GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Over the Last 150 Years, Large Stretches of Salmon Habitat have been Eliminated by Human Activity. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Brain Contributes to the Adaptive Success of Animals through the Control and Coordination of Muscle Contractions. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Geology of the Grand Canyon Area Exposes One of the Most Complete and Studied Sequences of Rock on Earth. GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Pioneers of the Teaching of Science Imagined that its Introduction into Education would Remove the Conventionality, Artificiality, and Backward-Lookingness GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Single-Celled Parasite known as Toxoplasma Gondii Infects more than Half of the World's Human Population GMAT Reading Comprehension
- During the Victorian Period, Women Writers were Measured Against A Social GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments