The Marison County Police Department Recently Implemented a New Traffic Safety Program GMAT Critical Reasoning

Question - The Marison County Police Department recently implemented a new traffic safety program whereby a police officer is required to give a traffic ticket—which demands that the violator pay a penalty fine— to any driver not wearing a seatbelt. The penalty fines for these tickets are significantly higher if the recipient of a ticket is a parent with at least one young child in the car. Because all drivers seek to avoid traffic tickets and fines, the new plan is likely to decrease the number of accidents that involve cars carrying young children.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion of the above passage?

1. Similar programs in other states have led to greater use of public transportation by residents.
2. Marison County does not have a public transportation system.
3. The number of non-seatbelt wearing parents of young children is no higher than the number of non-seatbelt wearing solo drivers.
4. A recent survey of all drivers from Marison County indicated that drivers would be less likely to engage in reckless driving behavior (including failure to wear seatbelts) if a penalty fine were in place.
5. Increased enforcement of seatbelt laws has been shown to reduce speeding on highways.

“The Marison County Police Department recently implemented a new traffic safety program” – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can by either finding a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer: D

Explanation: This is a Strengthen the Argument type of GMAT critical reasoning question. Here candidates need to strengthen an argument by providing a piece of supportive evidence or statement. candidates can answer this GMAT critical reasoning questions by studying the argument from the passage. Then look for the perfect piece of evidence to support it.

Let us check the conclusion statements given to find the correct answer for the given argument:

Option A: Incorrect

-Option A is incorrect as it states about greater use of transportation. We are here looking for an conclusion that would support the arugument. This answer choice is scope shift.

Option B: Incorrect

-Option B is out of scope. It shifts the argument to an incorrect subject. The use of no transportation is an incorrect piece of information. 

Option C: Incorrect

- This answer choices are tricky. It tries to shift the argument to a new topic.

Option D: Correct

-Choice D is the absolute correct answer. It strengthens the argument. It states that if all the drivers are imposed a penalty or fine, then the reckless driving behavior can be controlled. The penalty on vehicles that carry children without using seat belts would be heavy. This statement strengthens the argument that a new plan is likely to reduce the number of accidents on the roads.

Option E: Incorrect
-All the given answer choices except E added new details to the scenario. Option E shows a scope shift. 

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

• Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Sol Citrus, a small orchard that produces only organic citrus fruit, has faced new competition GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Unripe Lychee Fruit Contain a Compound called Hypoglycin GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Tiger Beetles are such Fast Runners that they can Capture Virtually any Nonflying Insect GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In the nation of Pelmenia, 20% of 18-year-olds are left-handed, GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The tobacco industry is still profitable and projections are that it will remain so GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In a taste test, participants were asked to try two versions of a cola GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The percentage of households with an annual income of more than $40,000 GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The cotton farms of Country Q became so productive that the market could not absorb GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Studies have shown that elderly people who practice a religion are much more likely to die GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Health officials claim that because the foods and beverages mentioned or consumed GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Monthly employee evaluations are an excellent tool for managers GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Engineers are investigating the suitability of Wantastiquet Pass as the site of a new bridge GMAT Critical Reasoning
• According to researchers, students exposed to a wider variety of GMAT question types fared better GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Physician: The Hormone Melatonin Has Shown Promise as a Medication for Sleep Disorders GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In order to reduce the number of items damaged while in transit to customers, GMAT Critical Reasoning
• A major health insurance company in Lagolia pays for special procedures prescribed by physicians GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In the first half of this year, from January to June, about three million videocassette recorders GMAT Critical Reasoning