The Life and Casualty Company Hopes that by Increasing its Environmental GMAT Sentence Correction

Question: The Life and Casualty Company hopes that by increasing its environmental fund revenues to $1.2 billion, that it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and no longer has to use its profits and capital to pay those claims bit by bit, year by year.

(A) that it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and no longer has
(B) enough has been set aside with which environmental claims can be paid and it will have no longer
(C) it has set aside enough for payment of environmental claims and thus no longer having
(D) enough has been set aside to pay for environmental claims, thus no longer having
(E) it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and will no longer have

“The Life and Casualty Company hopes that by increasing its environmental”- is a GMAT sentence correction question. These types of questions contain grammatical errors and we have to choose the correct statement from the options. This topic is the GMAT sentence correction comes with four options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. GMAT sentence correction is a part of GMAT verbal. It checks whether the candidate is able to decode the inaccuracy in the sentence. It also checks if they are able to bring out an idea or meaning of the context.

Answer: E
Explanation: The sentence states. The Life and Casualty company has increased the fund revenues to $1.2B. It has set aside enough to pay for claims and it will no longer have to pay those claims but by bit or year by year. Let's take a look at the options:

Option A
that it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and no longer has.- Incorrect. It incorrectly refers to an upcoming action by using the simple present tense word "has." This choice is awkward and too wordy since it repeatedly utilises the word "that," which may be removed without compromising the meaning.

Option B
enough has been set aside with which environmental claims can be paid and it will have no longer.- Incorrect. This response option refers to the meaning of the verb phrase "enough has been set aside" by using the phrase "with which environmental claims can be paid." This choice uses the redundant and awkward passive voice structure, "enough has been set aside."

Option C
it has set aside enough for payment of environmental claims and thus no longer having.- Incorrect. It uses the incorrect present participle. TThe parallelism between "it has set aside enough for payment of environmental claims" is broken by this choice. Furthermore, "no longer having to use its profits...by year." It refers to the reason for the action of "set aside" by using the word "for payment."

Option D
enough has been set aside to pay for environmental claims, thus no longer having. Incorrect. This answer option wrongly refers to an action that will occur in the future by using the present participle ("verb+ing" - "having" in this sentence). Additionally, Option D uses the redundant and uncomfortable passive voice construction "enough has been set aside."

Option E
it has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims and will no longer have.- Correct. The word "will...have" is appropriately used to describe an activity that will occur in the future in this answer option. The parallelism between "has set aside enough to pay for environmental claims" and "will no longer have to use its profits...by year" is maintained in Option E. Additionally, it refers to the goal or intention of the action "set aside" by using the infinitive verb form (“to + base form of verb” – “to + pay” in this sentence). The option also lacks any awkwardness or repetition.

Suggested GMAT Sentence Correction Question

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show