The Ill-Fated Home Construction Lending Act Of 1901 (The HCLA) GMAT Reading Comprehension

Reading Passage Question

The ill-fated Home Construction Lending Act of 1901 (the HCLA) was intended to help families pay for the construction of their homes. Americans were flocking to rented apartments in big cities (as were immigrants from around the world), and the biggest supporters of the HCLA were builders and real estate firms located in rural areas. Their hope was that a family that could afford to buy property and build a house in a rural area, as opposed to renting an inexpensive, but crowded and possibly dangerous, apartment in a city, would choose the former. Ostensibly, the HCLA would make it easier for potential homeowners to borrow by providing a federally backed guarantee to the lender, which at the time was more likely to be an insurance company than a bank. In other cases, the government would actually buy the property and pay for the construction of the house. A family could move in and make payments to the government over a much longer period than they could if they were repaying a commercial lender. Unlike the typical amortized 30-year mortgage of today, home loans at the time were usually repaid over three or perhaps five years, and the borrower made a balloon payment of the entire principal at the end of the term. An HCLA loan from the government could be repaid—interest and principal—over as many as 15 years, and did not require a large final payment.

Many lenders, however, did not actually want to have their loans guaranteed, and they resisted providing HCLA loans. For these companies, more profit could be realized by repossessing property when borrowers defaulted on their loans. As to the properties bought and resold by the government, the relatively small payments made at a fixed interest rate cost the government money, and this arrangement was abandoned.

In the same year that saw the passage of the HCLA, the Tenement House Act forced builders in New York to improve the condition of their apartments. Lighting, ventilation, and toilet facilities were improved, and the Tenement House Commission was established to enforce the new law. Other cities followed suit. Urban life was now more attractive to men and women who would have otherwise preferred to live in a rural area, but who needed the employment opportunities that the cities could provide.

“The ill-fated Home Construction Lending Act of 1901 (the HCLA)”- is a passage for the GMAT that addresses reading comprehension. Candidates must have a firm understanding of GMAT reading comprehension in English. This GMAT reading comprehension section consists of four comprehension questions. The purpose of the GMAT Reading Comprehension questions is to assess a candidate's capacity to understand, evaluate, and apply knowledge or ideas. By responding to the GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions section, candidates can actively practice.

Solutions and Explanation

  1. What is the primary purpose of this passage?

(A) To describe why the HCLA was passed, and why it proved ineffective
(B) To provide an overview of the home building situation in the early 20th-century America
(C) To give an example of a misguided attempt to regulate the urban housing industry
(D) To contrast the HCLA with current housing and home construction laws
(E) To elaborate on the reasons that Americans and foreigners flocked to the big cities in the United States during the early 1900s

Answer: A
Explanation:
The purpose of HCLA is discussed in the opening paragraph. The second paragraph discusses its effects. The third paragraph discusses a different law that forced people to relocate to cities. In correspondence with this, the first option is the right answer. The rest of the options are all invalid. This is because they do not relate to the entire theme of the paragraph correctly or have information that was not disclosed.

  1. Which of the following would most appropriately conclude this passage?

(A) The HCLA could not withstand this migratory push from rural life to city life, and was repealed less than six years after becoming law.
(B) At the same time, the farming industry was increasingly in the hands of large corporations.
(C) Even those elected officials who voted against the HCLA were surprised by its unpopularity.
(D) Though jobs were to be found in the large American cities, adjusting to urban life was still a shock for many young people who arrived at this time.
(E) The societal effect of the Tenement Housing Act continues to this day.

Answer: A
Explanation:
The conclusion should state that HCLA was a failure or something similar. This option says that the HCLA was repealed less than six years after it was passed because it was unable to withstand this migration from rural to urban life. This description fits the requirement given and so the first option is the right answer.

  1. According to the passage, one reason that the HCLA was expected to increase home construction in rural areas was that, under the HCLA, _______.

(A) interest rates were lower
(B) the borrower could make smaller payments
(C) insurance companies, not banks, loaned the money
(D) the borrower would not be able to default
(E) the net cost to the borrower was reduced

Answer: B
Explanation:
The first paragraph says something important regarding HCLA. A family could relocate and pay the government over a much longer period of time than they could if they were paying back a commercial lender. HCLA lengthened the loan term and lowered the amount owed. The borrower could thus make smaller payments as a result. This is what the second option states and therefore it is the right answer.

  1. According to the passage, the repercussions of the Tenement Housing Act _______.

(A) provided more employment for people moving to cities from rural areas
(B) had little effect on builders outside of New York City
(C) was abandoned because of its cost to the federal government
(D) convinced some people to try to find work in the big cities of the United States
(E) led to the passage of the HCLA

Answer: D
Explanation:
There are some men and women who would have preferred to live in a rural area but needed the employment opportunities that cities could offer. They found urban life to be more appealing. The statement in the fourth option can be inferred from this. As a result, the fourth option is the right choice.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show