The Historical Basis For The King Arthur Legend Has Long Been Debated GMAT Reading Comprehension

Reading Passage Question

The historical basis for the King Arthur legend has long been debated by scholars. One school of thought, citing entries in the History of the Britons and Welsh Annals, sees Arthur as a genuine historical figure, a Romano-British leader who fought against the invading Anglo-Saxons sometime in the late 5th to early 6th century. The other text that seems to support the case for Arthur's historical existence is the 10th-century Annales Cambriae. The latest research shows that the Annales Cambriae was based on a chronicle begun in the late 8th century in Wales. Additionally, the complex textual history of the Annales Cambriae precludes any certainty that the Arthurian annals were added to it even that early. They were more likely added at some point in the 10th century and may never have existed in any earlier set of annals.

This lack of convincing early evidence is the reason many recent historians exclude Arthur from their accounts of post-Roman Britain. In the view of historian Thomas Charles-Edwards there may well have been an historical Arthur, but that a historian can as yet say nothing of value about him. These modern admissions of ignorance are a relatively recent trend; earlier generations of historians were less skeptical. Historian John Morris made the putative reign of Arthur the organizing principle of his history of post-Roman Britain and Ireland. Even so, he found little to say about a historical Arthur. Partly in reaction to such theories, another school of thought emerged which argued that Arthur had no historical existence at all. Morris's Age of Arthur prompted archaeologist Nowell Myres to observe that no figure on the borderline of history and mythology has wasted more of the historian's time. Arthur is not mentioned in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle or named in any surviving manuscript written between 400 and 820. He is absent from Bede's early-8th-century Ecclesiastical History of the English People, another major early source for post-Roman history.

Some scholars argue that Arthur was originally a fictional hero of folklore — or even a half-forgotten Celtic deity — who became credited with real deeds in the distant past. They cite parallels with figures such as the Kentish totemic horse-gods Hengest and Horsa, who later became historicized. Bede ascribed to these legendary figures a historical role in the 5th-century Anglo-Saxon conquest of eastern Britain.

Historical documents for the post-Roman period are scarce. Of the many post-Roman archeological sites and places, only a handful have been identified as "Arthurian", and these date from the 12th century or later. Archaeology can confidently reveal names only through inscriptions found in reliably dated sites. In the absence of new compelling information about post-Roman England, a definitive answer to the question of Arthur's historical existence is unlikely.

“The historical basis for the King Arthur legend has long been debated”- is a passage for the GMAT that address reading comprehension. Candidates must have a firm understanding of GMAT reading comprehension in English. This GMAT reading comprehension section consists of four comprehension questions. The purpose of the GMAT Reading Comprehension questions is to assess a candidate's capacity to understand, evaluate, and apply knowledge or ideas. By responding to the GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions section, candidates can actively practice.

Solutions and Explanation

  1. According to the passage, Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People contains information that
  1. provides context that would argue against an historical Arthur
  2. undermines the notion of a historical Arthur by furnishing evidence that refutes that King Arthur ever existed
  3. suggests that Bede’s work did not fully account for events between 400 and 820
  4. indirectly supports the existence of an historical Arthur
  5. diverges from most narratives popular during the 12th century

Answer: (A)
Explanation:
According to the passage, Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People contains a description that would make a case against a historical Arthur. The first option corresponds to this, so it is the correct answer. The second option is incorrect because the information is distorted. The third option was not mentioned and thus is an incorrect choice. The fourth option contradicts the passage's main point. The final option is inconsistent.

  1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
  1. evaluate a historical debate and then take a position
  2. discuss two positions on an issue, while disagreeing with both
  3. discount evidence arguing against the existence of a historical person
  4. suggest that the verification of many historical figures is beyond our ability
  5. draw a link between mythical and historical figures

Answer: (A)
Explanation:
The second option is an incorrect answer because the passage's author does not agree with both sides. He does, in fact, take a stance. The third option is wrong because the author accepts evidence arguing against a historical argument. The last two options are incorrect answers because they are too broad. As a result, the first option is the correct answer.

  1. The contention that Arthur was a mythological figure who had been historicized by being included in accounts of real events is most consistent with which of the following?
  1. The complex textual history of the Annales Cambriae
  2. Thomas Charles-Edwards explanation of the existence of Arthur
  3. The fact that Arthur figures nowhere in any of Bede’s works covering the post-Roman period
  4. The lack of historical documents from the post-Roman period
  5. Bede’s inclusion of totemic horse gods in the history of the Anglo-Saxon conquest of Britain

Answer: (E)
Explanation:
Some scholars believe Arthur was originally a folkloric hero or even a long-forgotten Celtic deity who was later credited with real deeds in the distant past. They draw parallels with historical figures such as the Kentish totemic horse-gods Hengest and Horsa. Bede assigned historical significance to these legendary figures during the 5th-century Anglo-Saxon conquest of eastern Britain. According to this interpretation, the final option is the correct answer.

  1. According to the author of the passage, John Morris, while expressing little to no skepticism towards the historical Arthur, lends little support to the case of a historical Arthur because he
  1. assumes that Arthur was most likely a mythological figure
  2. only focuses on events from the early part of Arthur’s life
  3. provides a dearth of information pertaining to the life of Arthur
  4. has glaring historical inconsistencies in much of his writing
  5. unquestioningly accepts that Arthur played a small role in the history of Britain

Answer: (C)
Explanation:
The first option cannot be the right answer as the statement in it was not discussed until the third paragraph. The second option is simply a wrong answer as there was no mention of this in the passage. The last two options are also wrong answers because of the same reason as the second one. As a result, the third option is the correct answer.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show