The “Free Software Movement” is a Social and Political Campaign Which Advocates for Computer Software

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Reading Passage Question

The “free software movement” is a social and political campaign which advocates for computer software that users may run, modify, and redistribute as they please. Since the 1990s, however, a split has existed within the movement. Advocates of the original “free software” philosophy argue that proprietary software is unethical in the sense that computers can be tools of positive social change and restricting access to such tools is against the public interest. A competing philosophy, called “open source,” does not view the issue as a moral one and does not oppose cooperation with commercial developers of proprietary software. The open source philosophy regards public, collaborative authorship of code as an efficient model of software development.

The first computers ran software that was developed through open collaboration between corporate researchers and academics. However, as computers became more complex, the costs of developing software increased, and companies began to charge license fees and prohibit users from modifying the programs. In response, some users started to develop alternatives to commercial software and openly share the source code, first through online bulletin board systems and then by other means as the Internet developed. In 1997, an essay on the free software movement titled The Cathedral and the Bazaar inspired Netscape Communications Corporation to release its web browser as free software, marking the beginning of open source collaboration between commercial developers and users. Some early proponents of free software argued against the newly formed Open Source Initiative, contending that the organization’s narrow focus on releasing the source code for software ignored the greater issue of campaigning for truly free software and threatened to obscure distinctions among wholly free, partially free, and wholly proprietary software.

The problem with the original free software philosophy is that the activist approach associated with it can alienate commercial developers, and those developers can be important allies in the creation and promotion of free software. But the open source movement, by focusing on free software not as an end but as a means (of efficient software development, for instance), has lost the original movement’s emphasis on user rights not only to study and modify software but also to run and redistribute it. If these freedoms could be pursued without compromising them, and without a hostile stance toward commercial software makers, the result could be better software, with the users’ rights more fully preserved.

“The “free software movement” is a social and political campaign which advocates for computer software” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 2 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. The author implies that which of the following occurred after Netscape Corporation released its web browser as open source software?
  1. Free software advocates focused increasingly on technical questions.
  2. The original free software philosophy was embraced by many commercial software developers.
  3. Open source advocates attempted to rally the free software movement behind a program of efficient software development.
  4. The free software movement softened its criticism of commercial software corporations.
  5. Not all free software advocates agreed that Netscape’s browser fit the goals of their movement.

Answer: E
Explanation:
In the above passage the author mentions the disagreement when describing some early proponents of free software. He argued against the newly formed Open Source Initiative. He says contending that the organization’s narrow focus is on releasing the source code. This is basically for software being ignored creating the greater issue of campaigning for truly free software.

  1. According to the author, which of the following was true of software development prior to 1997?
  1. Software collaborations did not exist outside of purely academic settings.
  2. Corporations had collaborated with outside programmers but increasingly released proprietary software.
  3. Free and restrictive licenses were equally common among software products.
  4. The most common view among free software advocates was that user freedom was more important than the efficiency of software development.
  5. The most common view among free software advocates was that commercial developers should adopt some principles of open source software.

Answer: B
Explanation:
In the above passage the author mentions in the second paragraph the costs of developing software is increased. He adds that companies have started to charge license fees and prohibit users from modifying the programs. Hence option B is the correct answer.

  1. According to the passage, one point of agreement between the original free software philosophy and the open source movement is that
  1. user freedom is the primary motivation for developing free software
  2. developers of proprietary software act against the public interest
  3. users should boycott non-free software until it is released with less restrictive licenses
  4. collaboration with any entity that wants to develop free software furthers the goals of the movement
  5. there are benefits to giving users access to the source code for a piece of software

Answer: E
Explanation:
In the above passage the author mentions the original “free software” philosophy. He states that these computers can be tools for positive social change. He adds that restricting access to such tools is against the public interest. It is to benefit by giving users access to the source code for a piece of software. So believing the benefit is efficient software development. Hence option E is the correct answer.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show