The Eminent Sixteenth-Century Philosopher and Jurist Jean Bodin Denounced those Who Scoffed at the Belief in the Existence of Witches.

Reading Passage Question

The eminent sixteenth-century philosopher and jurist Jean Bodin denounced those who scoffed at the belief in the existence of witches. Their protestations of disbelief, he declared, showed that they were most likely witches themselves. He wrote of the pact that ―confessed‖ witches said they had signed with Satan. It obliged them to ridicule all talk of witchcraft as superstitious invention and contrary to reason. They persuaded many naive persons, Bodin insisted, whose arrogance and self-deception was such that they would dismiss as impossible even the actions of witches that were right before their eyes.

Because self-deception and secrecy from self-point to self-inflicted and often harmful ignorance, they invite moral concern: judgments about responsibility, efforts to weigh the degree of harm imposed by such ignorance, and questions of how to help reverse it. If the false belief is judged harmless and even pleasurable, as may be the case with the benevolent light in which most of us see our minor foibles, few would consider interfering. But clearly there are times when people are dangerously wrong about themselves. The anorexic girl close to starving to death who thinks that she looks fat in the mirror, and the alcoholic who denies having a drinking problem, are both in need of help.

Yet the help cannot consist merely in interference, but must somehow bring about a recognition on the individuals' part of their need and the role they play in not perceiving their problem accurately. Judgments about when and how to try to help people one takes to be in self-inflicted danger depend on the nature and the seriousness of the danger, as well as on how rational one thinks they are. To attribute self-deception to people is to regard them as less than rational concerning the danger one takes them to be in, and makes intervention, by contrast, seem more legitimate. But this is itself dangerous because of the difficulties of establishing that there is self-deception in the first place.

Some feel as certain that anyone who does not believe in their deity, their version of the inevitable march of history, or their views of the human psyche deceives himself as they might feel about the selfdeception of the anorexic and the alcoholic. Frequently, the more improbable their own views, the stronger is their need to see the world as divided up into those who perceive the self-evident and those who persist in deluding themselves.

Aiding the victims of such imputed self-deception can be hard to resist for true believers and enthusiasts of every persuasion. If they come to believe that all who do not share their own views are not only wrong but actually know they are wrong in one part of their selves that keeps the other in the dark, they can assume that it is an act of altruism to help the victimized, deceived part see through the secrecy and the self-deception. Zealots can draw on their imputing self-deception to nonbelievers to nourish any tendency they might have to a conspiracy theory. If they see the self—their own and that of others—as a battleground for a conspiracy, they may then argue that anyone who disagrees with them thereby offers proof that his mind has been taken over by the forces they are striving to combat.

It is not long before they come to see the most disparate events not only as connected but as intended to connect. There are no accidents, they persuade themselves. Calling something trivial or far-fetched counts, for holders of such theories, as further evidence of its significance. And denying what they see as self-evident is still more conclusive proof.

“On the surface, the conquest of the Aztec empire by Herman Cortes is one of the most amazing military accomplishments in history.” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 4 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. Focus on the main ideas of the passage. Which of the following general theories would be LEAST in disagreement with the theme of the passage?
  1. One‘s own beliefs shape one‘s judgment of the beliefs of others.
  2. One should strive to rid oneself of all self-deception.
  3. One is always aware at least to some degree of one‘s self-delusions.
  4. One can never conclusively show that another person is deceiving himself.
  5. One should never interfere in other people‘s affairs

Answer: A
Explanation: We need to predict the answer by summarizing the main point of the passage: The passage says that personal beliefs cloud our opinion of whether others are self-deceived. The option A says one’s own belief which is the same as personal belief. The second part of the option is also streamlined with the main point of the passage. Hence, A is the correct answer.

  1. Suppose one knows that a friend is not nearly as physically fit as the friend believes himself to be. According to the passage, one should:
  1. attempt to persuade the friend that he is deceiving himself.
  2. prevent the friend from engaging in strenuous physical activity.
  3. disabuse the friend of his belief if his lack of fitness endangers him.
  4. realize that one may be wrong about the friend‘s level of physical fitness.
  5. tell the friend frankly on his face that he is wrong in his belief

Answer: C
Explanation: We need to see what one would do in response to someone else‘s self deception? As per the second paragraph, if the deception is harmful, then one can intervene. If it is not, it’s better to keep the hands off. If this is the situation, then option C is correct. It says that disabuse the friend of his belief, only if fitness endangers him.

  1. Based on the information in the passage, the author believes that someone with very unorthodox views of the human psyche is:
  1. probably suffering from harmless self-deception.
  2. acting as irrationally as an alcoholic or an anorexic.
  3. likely to perceive differing views as self-delusional.
  4. unable to establish the presence of self-delusion in others.
  5. in need of psychiatric help

Answer: C
Explanation: We need to understand what the author means by “very unorthodox views”. It can be classified as extreme views. Now we need to see the main points of those extreme views. As per the 5th paragraph, they perceive others as self-deluded and attempt to rescue them from the supposed deception. Option C captures the first part of the prediction. Hence, it is the correct answer.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show