Reading Passage Questions
The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the extent of the President’s authority to involve United States troops in conflicts with other nations in the absence of a declaration of war. Instead, the question of the President’s authority in this matter falls in the hazy area of concurrent, concurrent resolution power, where authority is not expressly allocated to either the President or the Congress. The Constitution gives Congress the basic power to declare war, as well as the authority to raise and support armies and a navy, enact regulations for the control of the military, and provide for the common defense. The President, on the other hand, in addition to being obligated to execute the laws of the land, including commitments negotiated by defense treaties, is named commander in chief of the armed forces and is empowered to appoint envoys and make treaties with the consent of the Senate. Although this allocation of powers does not expressly address the use of armed forces short of a declared war, the spirit of the Constitution at least requires that Congress should be involved in the decision to deploy troops, and in passing the War Powers Resolution of 1973, Congress has at last reclaimed a role in such decisions.
Historically, United States Presidents have not waited for the approval of Congress before involving United States troops in conflicts in which a state of war was not declared. One scholar has identified 199 military engagements that occurred without the consent of Congress, ranging from Jefferson’s conflict with the Barbary pirates to Nixon’s invasion of Cambodia during the Vietnam conflict, which President Nixon argued was justified because his role as commander in chief allowed him almost unlimited discretion (power of free decision or latitude of choice within certain legal bounds “reached the age of discretion”) over the deployment of troops. However, the Vietnam conflict, never a declared war, represented a turning point in Congress’s tolerance of presidential discretion in the deployment of troops in undeclared wars. Galvanized by the human and monetary cost of those hostilities and showing a new determination to fulfill its proper role, Congress enacted the War Powers Resolution of 1973, a statute designed to ensure that the collective judgment of both Congress and the President would be applied to the involvement of United States troops in foreign conflicts.
The resolution required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war, to consult with Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and to report to Congress within 48 hours after the forces had actually been deployed. Most importantly, the resolution allows Congress to veto the involvement once it begins, and requires the President, in most cases, to end the involvement within 60 days unless Congress specifically authorizes the military operation to continue. In its final section, by declaring the resolution is not intended to alter the constitutional authority of either Congress or the President, the resolution asserts that congressional involvement in decisions to use armed force is in accord with the intent and spirit of the Constitution.
“The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the extent of the President’s authority to involve United States troops in conflicts with other nations in the absence of a declaration of war”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 6 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
- In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) showing how the Vietnam conflict led to a new interpretation of the Constitution’s provisions for use of the military
(B) arguing that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is an attempt to reclaim a share of constitutionally concurrent power that had been usurped by the President
(C) outlining the history of the struggle between the President and Congress for control of the military
(D) providing examples of conflicts inherent in the Constitution’s approach to a balance of powers
(E) explaining how the War Powers Resolution of 1973 alters the Constitution to eliminate an overlap of authority
Answer: B
Explanation: the author through this passage is mainly concerned about the War Powers Resolution of 1973 of the US. It does not expressly allocate powers either to the President or the Congress to declare war. However, this share of power has been historically induced by Presidents of the US to declare war numerous times.
- With regard to the use of United States troops in a foreign conflict without a formal declaration of war by the United States, the author believes that the United States Constitution does which one of the following?
(A) assumes that the President and Congress will agree on whether troops should be used
(B) provides a clear-cut division of authority between the President and Congress in the decision to use troops
(C) assigns a greater role to the Congress than to the President in deciding whether troops should be used
(D) grants final authority to the President to decide whether to use troops
(E) intends that both the President and Congress should be involved in the decision to use troops
Answer: E
Explanation: the author believes that for declaration of war by the United States both the President and Congress are involved in decision making to use the troops.
- The passage suggests that each of the following contributed to Congress’s enacting the War Powers Resolution of 1973 EXCEPT
(A) a change in the attitude in Congress toward exercising its role in the use of armed forces
(B) the failure of Presidents to uphold commitments specified in defense treaties
(C) Congress’s desire to be consulted concerning United States military actions instigated by the President
(D) the amount of money spent on recent conflicts waged without a declaration of war
(E) the number of lives lost in Vietnam
Answer: B
Explanation: the Congress contributed in many ways to enact the War Powers Resolution 1973. However, it was except when the Presidents of the US failed to uphold their part of commitment as specified in the defense treaties. This required both the Congress and the President to make combined decisions about using the troops which were overlooked by the latter. The presidents were indeed involved in using the troops without the approval of the Congress in wars like Nixon’s invasion of Canada for instance.
- It can be inferred from the passage that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is applicable only in “the absence of a declaration of war” (lines 48-49) because
(A) Congress has enacted other laws that already set out presidential requirements for situations in which war has been declared
(B) by virtue of declaring war, Congress already implicitly participates in the decision to deploy troops
(C) the President generally receives broad public support during wars that have been formally declared by Congress
(D) Congress felt that the President should be allowed unlimited discretion in cases in which war has been declared
(E) the United States Constitution already explicitly defines the reporting and consulting requirements of the President in cases in which war has been declared
Answer: B
Explanation: the application of the War Powers Resolution 1973 would be applicable only in case “the absence of declaration of war” is mentioned in the passage. This is because by virtue of declaring the war it implies that the Congress would implicitly participate in deploying troops for the US. This is ensuring that both the decisions of the Congress and the President plays its part and a unanimous decision-making process takes place.
- In can be inferred from the passage that the author believes that the War Powers Resolution of 1973
(A) is not in accord with the explicit roles of the President and Congress as defined in the Constitution
(B) interferes with the role of the President as commander in chief of the armed forces
(C) signals Congress’s commitment to fulfill a role intended for it by the Constitution
(D) fails explicitly to address the use of armed forces in the absence of a declaration of war
(E) confirms the role historically assumed by Presidents
Answer: C
Explanation: Based on the War Powers Resolution of 1973, it implies that based on the constitution, the Congress’s commitment in fulfilling the role of involving its decisions for declaration of war is established.
- It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding the invasion of Cambodia?
(A) Because it was undertaken without the consent of Congress, it violated the intent and spirit of the Constitution.
(B) Because it galvanized support for the War Powers Resolution, it contributed indirectly to the expansion of presidential authority.
(C) Because it was necessitated by a defense treaty, it required the consent of Congress.
(D) It served as a precedent for a new interpretation of the constitutional limits on the President’s authority to deploy troops.
(E) It differed from the actions of past Presidents in deploying United States troops in conflicts without a declaration of war by Congress.
Answer: A
Explanation: based on the passage it can be inferred that the author agrees with the fact that the President during the invasion of Cambodia violated the spirit and intent of the Constitution. This is because it declared war and the use of the troops without any approval from the Congress which is clearly stated within the Constitution.
- According to the provisions of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as described in the passage, if the President perceives that an international conflict warrants the immediate involvement of United States armed forces, the President is compelled in every instance to
(A) request that Congress consider a formal declaration of war
(B) consult with the leaders of both house of Congress before deploying armed forces
(C) desist from deploying any troops unless expressly approved by Congress
(D) report to Congress within 48 hours of the deployment of armed forces
(E) withdraw any armed forces deployed in such a conflict within 60 days unless war is declared
Answer: D
Explanation: The passage clearly states about the War Powers Resolution of 1973 which clearly stated that in case of immediate involvement of the US troops, it needs to be reported to the Congress. The reporting to the Congress needs to be done within 48 hours of deployment of the armed forces.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
- Many People Believe that Wages are Lower in Developing Countries than in Developed Countries
- More Selective than Most Chemical Pesticides in that they Ordinarily Destroy only Unwanted Species
- Citing the Fact that the Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita was Higher in 1997
- Historians have Identified Two Dominant Currents in the Russian Women's Movement of the Late Tsarist Period.
- Some Historians Contend that Conditions in the United States During the Second World War
- Comparable Worth, as a Standard Applied to Eliminate Inequities in Pay
- The United States Government has a Long-Standing Policy of Using Federal Funds to Keep Small Business Viable.
- A Recent Study has Provided Clues to Predator-Prey Dynamics in the Late Pleistocene Era.
- Even More Than Mountainside Slides of Mud or Snow, Naturally Occurring Forest Fires Promote the Survival of Aspen Trees.
- A One-Child Policy was Implemented in China in 1979
- The Pioneers of the Teaching of Science Imagined that its Introduction into Education would Remove the Conventionality, Artificiality, and Backward-Lookingness
- A Fundamental Principle of Pharmacology is that all Drugs have Multiple Actions. Actions that are Desirable in the Treatment of Disease are Considered therapeutic
- In the 1980's, Astronomer Bohdan Paczynski Proposed a Way of Determining Whether the Enormous Dark Halo Constituting the Outermost Part of the Milky Way Galaxy
- The General Density Dependence Model can be Applied to Explain the Founding of Specialist Firms
- The Black Death, a Severe Epidemic that Ravaged Fourteenth Century Europe
- The System of Patent-Granting, Which Confers Temporary Monopolies for the Exploitation of New Technologies
- Ethnohistoric Documents from Sixteenth-Century Mexico Suggesting that Weaving and Cooking were the Most Common Productive Activities for Aztec Women
- Solar Ponds are Bodies of Water in Which Circulation is Incomplete and There is a Very High Salt Concentration that Increases with Depth
- Traditional Social Science Models of Class Groups in the United States are Based on Economic Status
- Conventional Wisdom has it that Large Deficits in the United States Budget Cause Interest Rates to Rise.
Comments