The Americans with Disabilities act (ADA) was Designed to Ensure GMAT Critical Reasoning

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Question: The Americans with disabilities act (ADA) was designed to ensure that there is no discrimination against and unfair termination of differently-abled workers in the workplace. However, after the act was introduced, there has been a marked increase in unemployment among the differently-abled.

Which of the following best explains this seeming discrepancy?

  1. A number of differently-abled people chose not to work
  2. Not willing to deal with the issues of workplace discrimination of the differently-abled, several companies recruited fewer of them in the first place
  3. Knowing that the act was about to be enforced, companies terminated some of the differently-abled while they had a chance
  4. There was no act introduced that would guarantee a job for the differently-abled
  5. The unemployment among the able-bodied has remained consistently high

“The Americans with disabilities act (ADA) was designed to ensure that there is no discrimination against” – is a  GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer: B
Explanation
:

The GMAT's critical reasoning section tests candidates' capacity for critical thought and analytical reasoning. To produce a cogent response, the candidate needs to possess high cognitive ability.
Let's look at each option separately.

A: Inaccurate

It is not the correct choice. If such people chose not to work, then they would still be considered unemployed, and that fact would have nothing to do with discrimination or unfair termination.

B: Correct

It is the correct choice. This brings the problem to light: occupational discrimination and, to paraphrase the sentence, a rise in unemployment among those with disabilities. This answer is preferable to (A) because the opening sentence of the answer choice suggests that there is a clearer timeframe present. We are aware that many businesses' actions are a response to the ADA's passing, therefore the passage makes sense after the act was put into effect.

C: Inaccurate

It is an incorrect choice. Although it seems like a good idea at first, closer consideration eliminates it completely. Notably, the clause does not declare that businesses cannot fire people with disabilities. Instead, the ADA protects such individuals from wrongful termination, making this response, "while they had a chance," sound suspect.

D: Inaccurate

It is not the best option. Analysis: Neither the pre-ADA nor post-ADA work environments are affected by this. As far as we are aware, there has never been any legislation to provide employment for people with disabilities; if this is still the case, then nothing has changed legally since the introduction of the ADA in this regard, which would account for the gap.

E: Inaccurate

E is an incorrect choice. The issue in this situation is that. has stayed consistently high. We need to come up with a tenable explanation for the discrepancy between our expectations for the post-ADA workplace. The passage's depiction of it, which shows that more people with disabilities are unemployed.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show