Stemming From Public Outcry Following The Publication Of Upton Sinclai GMAT Reading Comprehension

Reading Passage Question

Stemming from public outcry following the publication of Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle, the US Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which required food and drug companies to include a list of any of a number of known harmful ingredients contained within their products for consumers’ benefit and to not list these ingredients if they were not present. Although Theodore Roosevelt supported the bill and other measures to improve consumer safety, he was skeptical of the benefits of investigative journalism, particularly since The Jungle ’s strong pro-socialist message to workers could incite violence. For similar reasons, Roosevelt had previously refused to release a separate government report on working conditions in the meat industry for fear of inciting social and economic upheaval, including the possibility of wide-spread strikes and even riots in protest of the meat industry’s practices.

More surprising supporters of the bill were leading food companies like Heinz and the Old Taylor Whiskey Company. Industry leaders had already embraced reform and had much higher standards for purity within their products than even the new laws would require, so company executives correctly assumed that greater regulation would simply drive competitors out of business and lead customers to their products. However, meat industry executives continued to oppose the bill until Roosevelt reversed his earlier decision to withhold information from the public about conditions within the factories. The release of this information led to a public outcry that forced the meat packing industry to abandon attempts to pressure members of the House of Representatives to block the bill, leading to the bill’s eventual passage in late 1906.

“Stemming from public outcry following the publication of Upton Sinclai”- is a GMAT reading comprehension exercise. Candidates need to be highly proficient in GMAT reading comprehension. There are four comprehension questions in this GMAT reading comprehension section. The purpose of the GMAT Reading Comprehension questions is to evaluate candidates' comprehension, analysis, and application skills. Candidates who are actively preparing can benefit from GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solutions and Explanation

  1. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly justify Theodore Roosevelt’s concerns surrounding the release of the report on the meat packing industry?
  1. The release of a document detailing worker safety violations in Colorado mines led to armed conflict between workers and police
  2. Consumer safety bills had been introduced to the House previously but had failed to garner support.
  3. Socialist pamphlets often led to extensive workers’ strikes even outside the industry they targeted.
  4. Ensuring consumer safety did not counter the ill effects of investigative journalism.
  5. The report could drive companies out of business, getting rid of competition between the industries.

Answer: A
Explanation
: For this kind of questions, the statements must be taken as true and analyzed. If the options are true, the next step would be to determine whether it would rationalize Roosvelt's actions. The first option is the right answer. This is because Roosevelt was concerned about the possibility of violence (stemming from the pro-socialist views). If this has happened in the Colorado mines before, it is clear that it can happen again. This is why he was hesitant to make the report public.

  1. It can be inferred that Sinclair was motivated, at least in part, by a desire to
  1. Force lawmakers to investigate factory practices
  2. Encourage socialist leanings among workers.
  3. Avoid social unrest and worker discontent.
  4. Justify greater regulation of the meatpacking industry.
  5. Encourage workers to strike and boycott certain companies.

Answer: B
Explanation
: The phrase "The Jungle's strong pro-socialist message to workers" should be reiterated. His book delivered a socialist message. That is why the question includes the phrase "in part." The first option is not supported by the passage. The third option is invalid because the passage makes no mention of him wanting to avoid unrest. The fourth option is also invalid because he ignored the rules. The last option is far too drastic. As a result, the second option is the correct answer.

  1. The passage suggests that Theodore Roosevelt and the executives from Heinz differed in which of the following ways?
  1. The executives were mainly concerned with decreasing competition, while Roosevelt was primarily concerned with worker safety.
  2. The executives wanted to take advantage of the strain the new laws would place on competitors, while Roosevelt looked to better protect consumers.
  3. Roosevelt wanted to prevent economic and social upheaval, while the executives wanted to benefit from purer products on the market.
  4. Roosevelt was heavily influenced by the meat packing industry, while the executives wished to avoid influence from other industries.
  5. Roosevelt supported the Pure Food and Drug Act while the executives worked to defeat it in the House of Representatives.

Answer: B
Explanation
: If a summary is made before looking at the options, these questions are always best. What did Roosevelt desire? He simply wanted to protect the customers. What did Heinz desire? In a nutshell, money. More money = less competition. Less competition = more regulations. This interpretation holds that the second option is the correct answer because it fits perfectly.

  1. Which of the following can be inferred about Theodore Roosevelt?
  1. He believed it was more important to prevent civil unrest than to ensure consumer safety.
  2. He did not want the working class to be exposed to any socialist ideas.
  3. He was not unwilling to change his positions on some issues.
  4. He was surprised that Heinz and the Old Taylor Whiskey Company supported the Pure Food and Drug Act.
  5. He reluctantly supported the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906.

Answer: C
Explanation
: The first option is a wrong answer. This is because he prioritized consumer safety. The second option is partially correct, but what he really desired was NO VIOLENCE. Socialist ideas may or may not incite violence; there is some uncertainty here. The fourth option must also be ruled out because he was not surprised. The final option contains distorted data. As a result, the third option is the correct answer because the statement can be clearly inferred.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show