Spiessa Restaurant Industry AWA GMAT Sample

Spiessa Restaurant Industry AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. In this AWA GMAT Sample, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws. Candidates need to mention the weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.

In the AWA GMAT sample essay, candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the AWA GMAT Sample including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate. To increase the GMAT AWA score, practicing from GMAT analytical writing practice papers is necessary.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention how the restaurant industry has changed in Spiessa. Candidates can also include statistics stated in the passage. With the help of the example and facts, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point.

Topic:

The following appeared as part of an article in the travel section of a newspaper:

“Over the past decade, the restaurant industry in the country of Spiessa has experienced unprecedented growth. This surge can be expected to continue in the coming years, fueled by recent social changes: personal incomes are rising, more leisure time is available, single-person households are more common, and people have a greater interest in gourmet food, as evidenced by a proliferation of publications on the subject.”

Discuss how well-reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The given argument debates the restaurant industry in the country of Spiessa, providing the reasons that the growth of the economy and personal income are also growing. I believe the author has failed to provide any data regarding this. This is merely an assumption or more of a thoughtful wish. Without any evident or statistical data, the argument is devoid of fact hence this cannot be proved.

First, this argument falsely assumes that past growth will affect the future. But, the author neglects to disclose the growth of the hotel industry in recent years. Because of the government’s decisions for catering companies in the past decade, the development of this industry makes sense. The government's decision to lower prices and improve food quality will definitely lead to people dining in restaurants. However, even in the best of economic times, and the most promising conditions, there are just countless restaurants that a given population can support and contribute to. It is conceivable that the demand for restaurants has previously been met by the remarkable growth of the past decade, which states that modern social changes will have a slight effect on the development of the restaurant industry.

Second, the reason provided by the author in the article is flawed because it mistakenly believes that social changes like more leisure time and increasing incomes will constantly grow the restaurant industry. However, there is no data to explain why people with higher incomes and more free time only spend money in restaurants. There is a chance that this group of individuals will spend the money on camping, foreign trips, or watching a movie at the multiplex. If people go for these alternatives, the restaurant business cannot develop according to their theories.

Third, the proof supporting the argument makes a powerless case that single-individual families and interest in exquisite cuisine caused people to have food at restaurants. Still, there isn't sufficient data to back this argument. It is conceivable that singles may be less likely to eat in a restaurant because they do not have a close partner to accompany them. It is also conceivable that Spiessa’s residents may also be accustomed to eating and preparing delicious meals at home. Thinking about these models, the restaurant business development is surprising.

Moreover, the argument can be improved by reviewing the country's history of experiences with the development of the restaurant industry. Specifically, the growth is mainly due to people's interest in specialty fast-food restaurants. The food in these restaurants is in great demand. In order to meet this demand, the hotel industry has decided to open more restaurants in metropolitan areas. Adding this example will definitely strengthen the author’s reasoning. In conclusion, the argument comprises a number of fallacies. The author must have provided relevant facts or any holistic survey reports that might have supported the author's view about this restaurant.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Spiessa Restaurant Industry AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER