Scientists Finally Learn How to Create Large Amounts of Copper AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Scientists Finally Learn How to Create Large Amounts of Copper AWA GMAT Sample is an analytical writing assessment that examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence about ways to create large amounts of copper from other chemical elements, the regulation of copper mining will become unnecessary. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention their background and provide a reason for ways to create large amounts of copper from other chemical elements, the regulation of copper mining will become unnecessary. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that, they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reason, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared as part of an article on government funding of environmental regulatory agencies:

“When scientists finally learn how to create large amounts of copper from other chemical elements, the regulation of copper mining will become unnecessary. For one thing, since the amount of potentially available copper will no longer be limited by the number of actual copper deposits, the problem of over-mining will quickly be eliminated altogether. For another, manufacturers will not need to use synthetic copper substitutes, the production of which creates pollutants. Thus, since two problems will be settled—over-mining and pollution—it makes good sense to reduce funding for mining regulation and either save the money or reallocate it where it is needed more.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The author of the above-given argument has been taken from an article on government funding of environmental regulatory agencies. It has been stated that since huge amounts of copper can be derived from other chemical elements, there is no further requirement for copper mining regulations. Since this matter is providing an end to two issues, namely, pollution and over-mining, the allotment for the funding regulation can be lowered. The argument has not taken into consideration many vital points and has used certain ill-terminology to comprise the argument which is making it a poor one. The conclusion is built on some fragile assumptions that cannot be held compelling, and that is making it a weak and unconvincing argument.

Firstly, the author has stressed the fact of the creation of copper from other chemical elements without any hassle. This is altogether a very weak assumption since there is no strong evidence to support this process to be a feasible practice. The argument has only mentioned how copper can be created from other chemicals but nowhere mentioned the availability of the source material in nature to keep creating the required amount of copper. Let us assume we have that amount of the source material, but will we have the chance to extract that amount or adopt technological methods and tools that would financially support the whole process? Nothing is mentioned regarding the same. To understand this in a better way, let us consider the two chemical elements - iron and lead to make copper. The question arises, will there be enough quantities of both iron and lead to make copper? And also, will the cost be affordable enough in the long run? Along with this another question also gets highlighted, will the other industries that are in dire need of iron and lead to produce respective materials not be deprived? This is definitely going to cost them business. There is no mention of whether the other source materials will require mining for producing copper. If that is the case, then the issue of over-mining will not be resolved.

Secondly, the argument highlights the fact that the decrease in the creation of synthetic copper will result in a reduction in pollution. This again makes the argument a feeble one since the author has nowhere mentioned any correlation between the emission of pollution and the creation of synthetic copper. The author has not provided any clue about the method by which copper will be produced with the help of other source materials. It may happen that the process may emit even worse gases than the previous approach.

Thirdly, The argument has not provided any information about the sale of synthetic copper, its customer base, the number of companies selling it, and its demand. It may be possible that there will still be many companies that will use synthetic copper as their basic material. Since synthetic copper is cheaper, most companies will not switch to regular copper as it will highly impact their purchase bills. The argument has not provided any evidence stating that the new copper production will completely eliminate the need for synthetic copper and it will have affordable prices.

Lastly, to conclude the argument has missed out on many factors that would have made it a strong one. The author has also mentioned any evidence stating that the regulation was made to cut down on over-mining and pollution. Had there been clear pieces of evidence governing the argument as discussed above, it would have made a convincing and relevant one.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays:

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Scientists Finally Learn How to Create Large Amounts of Copper AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER