Road Congestion Has Grown By 37 Percent GMAT Reading Comprehension

Reading Passage Question

Road congestion has grown by 37 percent, and as people switch from private cars to public transport, the total distance traveled by rail is expected to increase 60 percent. Despite the obvious increase in demand for space on our roads and trains, governments are failing to match forecast growth with investment in either mode of transport. In the 10 worst areas, the problems are already chronic, with immediate investment needed if sufficient capacity is to be created to cope with future demand. In these areas, new roads and tracks and longer platforms that can handle longer trains are already needed to relieve bottlenecks, congestion and severe overcrowding during peak hours. Despite demand, there are no plans to expand road and rail networks significantly and, indeed, closures and cuts in funding are on the agenda. The paucity of public investment raises considerable doubts that those few projects that are currently supported by government will ever be completed because ministers are refusing to say how much public money they will receive.

“Road congestion has grown by 37 percent”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 5 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

Question 1
Which of the following statements can you infer to be true?

  1. People are giving up their cars to undertake journeys by train.
  2. Rail passengers face a bleak future of overcrowding and more expensive journeys.
  3. Road use has grown by 37 percent and rail use by 60 percent.
  4. Despite increased demand there are no plans to increase road and rail networks significantly.
  5. As road congestion has grown, the total distance traveled by rail has increased.

Answer: A
Explanation: As mentioned in the passage, people are switching from private cars to public transport. As a result the total distance travelled by rail is expected to increase 60 percent. Option B can, in part, be inferred from the lack of funding. One could infer that the rail service would deteriorate as more people switched to rail from cars. But whether the cost of journeys will increase cannot be inferred. Option C and E fail because the increase in congestion has already occurred, while the increase in train journey miles is forecasted. D is explicitly stated in the passage so cannot be inferred.

Question 2
It is hard to arrive at any other conclusion than travelers face a bleak future of:

  1. overcrowded networks, slower journey times and higher fares
  2. congestion, bottlenecks and overcrowding
  3. congestion, overcrowded networks and higher fares
  4. overcrowding, congestion and even slower journey times
  5. slower journey times and higher fares

Answer: B
Explanation: As mentioned, despite the demand for space on roads and trains, governments are failing to match forecast growth with investment in either mode of transport. In some of the worst areas, the problems are already chronic. Those areas are already needed to relieve bottlenecks, congestion and severe overcrowding during peak hours.

Question 3
In the context of the passage, the word paucity means:

  1. the small amount of rail investment
  2. the diminutive public investment in the expansion of the railway
  3. the presence of something in only immense quantities
  4. the low level of public investment
  5. the presence of something in only diminutive quantities

Answer: D
Explanation:
Paucity means the presence of something in only small or insufficient quantities. As per the passage. Public investment raises considerable doubts that those few projects that are currently supported by the government will ever be completed. Since ministers are refusing to say how much public money they will receive.

Question 4
In the worst 10 areas, immediate investment is already needed:

  1. because the problem there is already chronic
  2. because during peak periods they suffer bottlenecks, congestion and severe overcrowding
  3. if the infrastructure is to cope with future demand
  4. if they are to build the extra rail tracks, roads and longer train platforms
  5. before people can switch from private to public transport

Answer: C
Explanation: The passage shows that the problems are already chronic in those areas, but the investment is required so that future demand can be met. As mentioned, “with immediate investment needed if sufficient capacity is to be created to cope with future demand.”

Question 5
It can be inferred from the passage that:

  1. There was a greater demand for rail travel than travel by private car.
  2. Governments were in favor of people switching from cars to public transport.
  3. There is every indication that governments were against people switching modes of transport.
  4. Governments were undermining the switch from private to public transport by failing to invest in transport networks.
  5. Governments were doing little in practical terms to encourage people to switch from cars to public transport.

Answer: E
Explanation: Government failure to invest in the transport network led to the effect of failing people in bringing people from private to public transport. The passage clearly states that governments were investing little in any form of transport. In practice they are doing little to encourage people to switch. It can not be inferred if the government was in favour of people switching or not.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show