Residents Of An Apartment Complex Are Considering Two Possible Plans GMAT Critical Reasoning

Question: Residents of an apartment complex are considering two possible plans for collecting recyclable trash.
Plan 1 - Residents will deposit recyclable trash in municipal dumpsters located in the parking lot. The trash will be collected on the first and the fifteenth days of each month.
Plan 2 - Residents will be given individual containers for recyclable trash. The containers will be placed at the curb twice a week for trash collection.

Which of the following points raised at a meeting of the residents, if valid, would most favor one of the recycling plans over the other?

(A) Residents will be required to exercise care in separating recyclable trash from nonrecyclable trash.
(B) For trash recycling to be successful, residents must separate recyclable bottles and cans from recyclable paper products.
(C) Penalties will be levied against residents who fail to sort their trash correctly.
(D) Individual recycling containers will need to be made of a strong and durable material.
(E) Recyclable trash that is allowed to accumulate for two weeks will attract rodents.

“Residents of an apartment complex are considering two possible plans”- is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can by either finding a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer: (E)
Explanation
:
For this question, the right answer will either undermine or support any one of the plans. This is because the question asked for an answer that if valid would make anyone plan better than the other. It is important to state all the options and analyze them individually to find the right answer. After a thorough understanding of each of the options, it will be easy to eliminate it if the option does not meet the criteria.

Option-A: Incorrect
The statement in this option says that residents will be required to separate recyclable trash from non-recyclable trash. This exercise must be completed in both plans.

Option-B: Incorrect
The second option is a wrong answer. It states that residents must separate recyclable paper products from recyclable bottles and cans in order for trash recycling to be successful. This is invalid for the same reason as the first one.

Option-C: Incorrect
This is also a wrong answer. The statement in this option says that residents who fail to correctly sort their trash will face penalties. This is out of scope which makes this an incorrect choice.

Option-D: Incorrect
The statement explains that each recycling container must be constructed from a robust and long-lasting material. This is completely out of scope and so a wrong answer.

Option-E: Correct
This sentence explains that rodents will be drawn to recyclable trash that has been left to accumulate for two weeks. The second point will be weakened by this. They might prefer the first plan because if they implement this plan, there is an unresolved issue. So, this is the right answer.

From the above explanation, it can be clearly understood that the fourth option is the correct choice.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show