Question: Research indicates that college professors generally were raised in economically advantaged households. For it was discovered that, overall, college professors grew up in communities with average household incomes that were higher than the average household income for the nation as a whole.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument:
(A) inappropriately assumes a correlation between household income and economic advantage
(B) fails to note there are some communities with high average household incomes in which no college professors grew up
(C) presumes without justification that college professors generally were raised in households with incomes that are average or above average for their communities
(D) does not take into account the fact that college professors generally have lower salaries than their counterparts in the private sector
(E) fails to take into account the fact that many college professors live in rural communities which generally have low average household incomes
“Research Indicates That College Professors Generally Were Raised GMAT Critical Reasoning”- is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can by either finding a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.
Answer: (C)
Explanation:
The GMAT's critical reasoning section gauges a candidate's logic and analytical skills. To generate a logical response, the applicant must employ reasoning and deduction abilities. Examining each choice individually is the correct process to get the right answer.
Option - A: Incorrect
This option makes the claim that the argument incorrectly assumes a relationship between household income and economic advantage. This is not the right reason to prove that the argument is flawed.
Option - B: Incorrect
This option claims that the argument fails to mention that some neighborhoods with high average household incomes have no college professors as residents. This is not the correct reason to prove that the argument is flawed.
Option - C: Correct
This response claims that the argument makes the unfounded assumption that college professors generally grew up in families earning average or above average incomes for their neighborhoods. It is implied in the stimulus that they grew up in neighborhoods where the average income was higher than the national average. Because of this, it is presumed that their households enjoyed financial advantages. It is also assumed that these professors' household incomes were able to compete with or higher than the median income in their neighborhoods.
Option - D: Incorrect
This option claims that the argument ignores the fact that university professors typically earn less money than their counterparts in the private sector. This is not an accurate description that is enough to prove that the argument is flawed.
Option - E: Incorrect
This option claims that the argument ignores the fact that a large number of college professors reside in rural areas, where the average household income is typically low. This is not the appropriate reason to prove that the argument is flawed.
The third option is the correct answer. This is because the justification and the explanation given is enough to prove that the argument is flawed.
Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples
- Utrania was formerly a major petroleum exporter, but in recent decades economic stagnation GMAT critical reasoning
- Useful protein drugs, such as insulin, must still be administered by the cumbersome GMAT critical reasoning
- Unripe Lychee Fruit Contain a Compound called Hypoglycin GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Tiger Beetles are such Fast Runners that they can Capture Virtually any Nonflying Insect GMAT Critical Reasoning
- In the nation of Pelmenia, 20% of 18-year-olds are left-handed, while just 10% of 45-year-olds and 2% of 70-year-olds are left-handed
- The Tobacco Industry is Still Profitable and Projections are that it will Remain so GMAT critical reasoning
- The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing" GMAT critical reasoning
- In a taste test, participants were asked to try two versions of a cola GMAT critical reasoning
- The percentage of households with an annual income of more than $40,000 GMAT critical reasoning
- The nature of English literature reflects the rich and diverse vocabulary of the English language, which resulted from the dual influence of the Anglo-Saxon and, later, French languages GMAT critical reasoning
- A study released by a major medical center has found that people who experience a stroke are frequently not treated quickly GMAT critical reasoning
- The difficulty with the proposed high-speed train line is that a used plane GMAT critical reasoning
- The cotton farms of Country Q became so productive that the market could not absorb all that they produced GMAT critical reasoning
- The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia GMAT critical reasoning
- Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides GMAT critical reasoning
- Sol Citrus, a small orchard that produces only organic citrus fruit, has faced new competition GMAT critical reasoning
- Studies have shown that elderly people who practice a religion are much more likely to die GMAT critical reasoning
- Health officials claim that because the foods and beverages mentioned or consumed on many television programs GMAT critical reasoning
- Monthly employee evaluations are an excellent tool for managers GMAT critical reasoning
- Engineers are investigating the suitability of Wantastiquet Pass as the site of a new bridge GMAT critical reasoning
Comments