Reelect Adams AWA GMAT Sample

Reelect Adams AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate via an essay. In this AWA GMAT Sample, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws. Candidates need to mention the weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for AWA GMAT is to practice from AWA GMAT practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The AWA GMAT essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.

In the AWA GMAT sample essay, candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for AWA GMAT Sample requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the AWA GMAT Sample including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate. To increase the AWA GMAT score, practicing from GMAT analytical writing practice papers is necessary.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention how Adams can be a good leader. Candidates can also include statistics stated in the passage. With the help of the example and facts, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point.

Topic: The following appeared as a part of an advertisement for Adams, who is seeking reelection as governor:

“Reelect Adams, and you will be voting for proven leadership in improving the state’s economy. Over the past year alone, 70 percent of the state’s workers have had increases in their wages, 5,000 new jobs have been created, and six corporations have located their headquarters here. Most of the respondents in a recent poll said they believed that the economy is likely to continue to improve if Adams is reelected. Adams’s opponent, Zebulon, would lead our state in the wrong direction because Zebulon disagrees with many of Adams’s economic policies.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The advertisment for Adams reelection campaign says that the people should reelect Adam. The reason is that under his leadership 70% of state workes have had increased wage, 5000 new jobs were created and six cooperation located their headquater there. Moreover in a survey, most of the respondents stated that the economy will continue to improve if Adams is elected again as a governor. The argument also states that Zebulon would lead the state in the wrong direction. This would be because he disagrees with adam on the economic policies. The argument is not well reasoned and has many flaws.

The argument appears convincing at the start but further studying unveils a lack of evidence and baseless assumptions. There is no evidence that proves that Adams was the only cause of the positive progress of the state’s economy. Also, there is not any detailed information on the above-mentioned poll. Lastly, there is not enough information on how Zebulon can not be a good leader. The passage also does not state any reason regarding the policies that he disagrees with. The conclusion of the argument relies only on assumptions. There is no clear evidence of the claims that were made. Therefore the argument is unconvincing.

First of all the argument readily assumes that Adams is the only reason behind the economic growth. And he should be reelected again on the basis of his past work improvements. It is fair to believe that the state head has a great impact on its economic condition. But there is no measurable proof of good work done by Adam. About 70% of the workers got a wage increase, but the argument lacks in providing details about how much was the increment, no statement of the influence caused by Adams in the same, whether the increment was more or less than the last year. Furthermore, the six corporations that moved to the state seem a great addition to the state. But the formalities for such a huge transformation require a lot of time. It would be unwise to believe that it has all been done just in one year. It is reasonable to believe that the forerunners had a significant part in the entire process.

Secondly, the argument does not provide a complete report about the poll. There is no details about who was interviewed, whether they were the people of the state or the people of the new corporations Adams brought into the state. There is no information on how many people were interviewed, were the poll was conducted by the supporters of Adams or by an autonomous group, did they vote for Adams last year. To reach any conclusion these unanswered questions need definitive answers. It is important to know if the poll was conducted in an unbiased manner. This would have been more convincing if the argument had any clear information and provided the details.

Finally, it is not wise to believe that Zebulon would lead the state in the right direction solely on the basis of his disagreement with Admas economic policies. There is no mention of the policies of Adams. It is possible that Zebulon might have better policies that can develop the states faster than Adams. The author again fails to mention the policies that Zebulon stands for. Without important supporting answers, one is left with the impression that the argument is more of wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.

In conclusion, the argument is not well reasoned, though, it could work well as an advertising method to get people to vote for Adams. The argument should have provided solid evidence to prove that Adams was the reason behind the improvement of the state’s economy. Also, the author should have mentioned the aspects that Adams will work on to solve if reelected. Moreover, the poll should have contained more demographics. And lastly, Zebulon’s policies should have been addressed. The argument lacks important information, hence it is flawed and open to debate.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Reelect Adams AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER