Proposal to Increase the Health And Retirement Benefits of Employees AWA GMAT Sample

“Proposal to increase the health and retirement benefits of employees AWA GMAT sample” is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this AWA GMAT sample, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for AWA GMAT sample is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The AWA GMAT sample essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. The candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the AWA GMAT Sample Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: In Proposal to increase the health and retirement benefits of employees, the argument article is not full of negative aspects. Candidates should provide a brief of the passage. In addition, specific reasons and illustrations are provided to focus on in this GMAT AWA article.
Paragraph 1: The first paragraph is explained using examples that support strong reasoning and rational analysis with respect to health and retirement benefits. The current benefits are fine for the employees or should the benefits increase are discussed. Candidates can provide examples and state their point of view.
Paragraph 2: The second sub-reason is specified using sub-examples and logical analysis like reason not to increase. The sub-reasons like profits, benefits, revenues, and other reasons have been described here. Candidates can also include real life examples to make their point of view stronger.
Last paragraph: This paragraph raises the argument about a proposal to increase benefits for employees as the subject of the GMAT Analysis Issue. With the help of the third example and argument, it is shown that the point of view may be wrong and inconsistent.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support their point. Here is a summary of the above whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes the conclusion and summary of the article. It is briefed with an increase in profits through different strategies. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a restaurant.

Based on the content, structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the article. This is by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive and effective actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible.

• Instead of studying, analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic and salient feature is chosen. This is maintained throughout the length of the article.
• The entire article gives facts, relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing logical reasons and illustrations.
• Strong declarative and emphatic statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
• The supporting statements are framed well, formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and conclude the article with a strong point.

Topic: The proposal to increase the health and retirement benefits that our employees receive should not be implemented at this time. An increase in these benefits is not only financially unjustified, since our last year’s profits were lower than those of the preceding year, but also unnecessary, since our chief competitor, Panacea, offers its employees lower health and retirement benefits than we currently offer. We can assume that our employees are reasonably satisfied with the health and retirement benefits that they now have since a recent survey indicated that two-thirds of the respondents viewed them favorably.

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument.

Sample Essay

At this time, it is not appropriate to approve the proposal to increase the health and retirement benefits that our employees receive. The profits from the previous year were lower than those from the year before. Hence, increasing these benefits is not only superfluous but also financially irrational. This is because the main rival, Panacea, provides its employees with lesser health and retirement benefits than we do. A recent poll revealed that two-thirds of respondents had a favorable opinion of their current health and retirement benefits.It can be presumed that our employees are largely content with them.

A rise in health and retirement benefits for Nostrum employees, according to the vice president of the company, is currently deemed unneeded. This is financially unreasonable given a drop in profits from the previous year. Also, considering the fact that Nostrum's main rival offers cheaper benefits than Nostrum. The author further claims that a recent survey found that Nostrum employees are content with their current benefits. Although the vice president's argument has some value, it is not well-supported.

Most obviously, the vice president claims that an increase in benefits cannot be justified financially due to a fall in earnings from the previous year. However, it's completely possible that raising health and retirement benefits could raise employee happiness. It could inspire them to work more, boosting worker productivity. This will help to generate revenue more than the benefit increases will cost. Likely, the fall in profit level was merely the result of the previous year being an extraordinarily prosperous year.

Second, the vice president claims that Nostrum's main rival, Panacea, offers lesser health and retirement benefits, making an increase in benefits superfluous. Several obvious presumptions are made, including the one that Panacea is directly equal to it in terms of company size and total benefits provided to employees. Panacea likely pays its workers a lot more than Nostrum does, making the difference in health and retirement benefits acceptable. The vice president's claim cannot be substantively supported by this piece of evidence without a deeper examination of Panacea's other advantages.

Last but not least, the vice president estimates that Nostrum's employees are largely satisfied with the health and retirement benefits. This is based on the findings of the most recent study. This presumption is dubious for several reasons. First off, there is no mention of the survey's sample type or amount of respondents. Few employees likely participated in the poll, making the findings less than fully representative of all employees. Another possibility is that employees who are dissatisfied with their current benefits were less likely to respond to the poll out of apathy or other factors. As a result, the survey's findings would be more favorable than the actual situation. As a result, until the poll is proven to be valid, it cannot be used to reject the plan to boost health and retirement benefits.

As a result, the vice president's decision to reject the suggestion to raise benefits is unjustified, and his line of reasoning is dubious. The vice president must demonstrate that the cost of increasing benefits outweighs their financial benefits. The benefits offered by competitors are comparable. The survey finding that employees are satisfied with the current benefits is valid to make a stronger case for rejecting the proposal.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

• Deluxe Air Filter AWA GMAT Sample
• Viewers' attitudes toward prime-time television programs AWA GMAT sample
• 15-year-olds are not eligible for their driver’s license AWA GMAT Sample
• Medical helicopters AWA GMAT Sample
• With an increasing demand for highly skilled workers AWA GMAT Sample
• Chemical Compound in Shampoo AWA GMAT Sample
• Funding Available for Repair of Roads and Bridges AWA GMAT Sample
• Announcement by Publisher of The Mercury AWA GMAT Sample
• City of Helios AWA GMAT Sample
• Cumquat Cafe AWA GMAT Sample
• Middle-Aged Consumers AWA GMAT Sample
• Motorcycle X AWA GMAT Sample
• Scientists Must Typically Work 60 to 80 Hours A Week AWA GMAT Sample
• Reverse the Deterioration of Postal Service AWA GMAT Sample
• Stronger Laws AWA GMAT Sample
• Occupancy Rates for Campus Housing AWA GMAT Sample
• Professor Taylor AWA GMAT Sample
• Aviva Airlines AWA GMAT Sample
• Country of Sacchar AWA GMAT Sample
• Fern Valley University AWA GMAT Sample