Practice of Officially Changing Speed Limits on the Highways AWA GMAT Sample

Practice of officially changing highway speed restrictions is a GMAT AWA Sample. Through an essay, the GMAT analytical writing assessment evaluates a candidate's writing abilities. Candidates must highlight the weaknesses in the provided argument in the AWA GMAT sample. Practice with GMAT AWA sample questions is the most effective strategy to get ready for the exam. Candidates should make sure to arrange and plan their replies before giving them. Candidates must demonstrate effective concept presentation skills in the AWA GMAT example essay. More GMAT AWA practise tests are available to candidates.

Candidates must support their points with facts in the AWA GMAT example essay while also outlining their opinions. Candidates should also make an effort to persuade the readers by detailing the various numbers and facts of the scenario. However, candidates must be aware that the GMAT AWA Essay demands them to adhere to a specific format in order to write in an ordered manner. You can consider the following format for the AWA GMAT Sample Essay, which includes five significant paragraphs, to be adequate.

Introduction: Candidates must first clearly identify the topic of the assigned essay and how effectively it is reasoned. The candidates must address the overview of the passage in their introduction.
Paragraph 1: Candidates must present the facts from the passage in this paragraph. They may also contest the veracity of the passage and provide justifications. All of the important topics that may be included in the following paragraphs should be covered in this one.
Paragraph 2: The second justification for the candidate's opinion should be included in this paragraph. Candidates may discuss their history and give their justifications. It is demonstrated that the point of view is incorrect and inconsistent with the aid of the example and argument.
Final paragraph: The passage should be emphasised in this paragraph. Candidates may point out the author's shortcomings and cite examples to support them. Additionally, they might bring up what might have been different and start a conversation.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article. It includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic. This is done by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic:

“The practice of officially changing speed limits on the highways – whether by increasing or decreasing them – is a dangerous one. Consider what happened over the past decade whenever neighboring East Cambria changed its speed limits. An average of 3 percent more automobile accidents occurred during the week following the change than had occurred during the week preceding it – even when the speed limit was lowered. This statistic shows that the change in speed limit adversely affected the alertness of drivers.”

Discuss how well reasoned … etc.

Sample Essay:

One claim made in the editorial is that raising the speed limit has a significant influence on people's lives. Every time the speed limit is altered, whether it is raised or dropped, it is the cause of a rise in accidents in the adjoining East Cambria. The editor presents a statistic by stating that this sort of mishap rose by 3% over the course of the week. This was in response to the modification that had taken place during the week before it, even if the speed limit had been dropped.

The news in an editorial should be presented from every angle. As a result, it comes to a dubious conclusion. Let's talk about the perspective gaps.

Firstly, the editor only considers the changes of one week. One week is a very short time to consider. There may be other reasons for the increased rate of accidents. The editor concentrated on only one incident, that is the change in speed limits. He wanted to convey that people are highly incapable of maintaining the speed as it is changed very frequently. There may be so many reasons for accidents. It could be bad weather conditions, high traffic, holiday jams, ill road conditions, construction on the road and many other reasons as examples. But the editor only blames the change in speed limit. A random week cannot be considered as the final statement. Speed limits are changed in which week and the cases of breaking speed limits must be highlighted in the statistics. Then only the editorial should be reliable enough.

Secondly, the editor did not concentrate on the difference between the accidents. He should have discussed the nature of accidents that occurred before and after changing the speed limit. There are lots of causes for an accident. There is a high chance that before the specific week, there were dangerous accidents. In that week which accidents occurred were not that fatal, those were minor. Thus, the argument is suffering from insufficient, one-sided statements. Those 3 percent increase in accidents is not clearly indicating the reason at all. There must be statements about the accidents that occurred in West Cambria and East Cambria. The road conditions of the two places must be sighted very clearly, so that one can easily compare the two. There should not be a comparison within two different kinds of situations. But the editor totally blames the changing system of speed limits.

Thirdly, the editor neglected to provide precise East Cambria and West Cambria figures. He ought to have taken into account the state of the roads and how commuters are using them. When the editor discusses traffic accidents, the driver's age, speed, and conduct must be included. It is important to understand that two cities are completely distinct from one another in every way. But it is the editor's responsibility to draw attention to these distinctions and make them explicit in his editorials. The reader will grasp the issue better after reading this. When stating a statistic, there should be fairness. These numbers will enable people to go beyond the simple adjustment in speed restrictions to the real cause of these incidents.

Therefore, the statistical proof is not sufficient. It does not highlight the advantages of changing the speed limit. The day the speed limit was altered and the drivers' reactions to that must be mentioned. Without knowing the precise week, we cannot say that an increase in accidents is solely due to a change in speed restrictions. There must be a notable difference between the outcomes of West Cambria and East Cambria, as well as how the populace responded. Thus, the argument as a whole is founded on nebulous numbers. For the argument to be sufficiently trustworthy, accurate statistics must be provided.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Practice of Officially Changing Speed Limits on the Highways AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER