Petitions From Farmers AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Petitions from farmers AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can see the purpose of using opinion polls for the Presidential elections has emerged as a heated topic for debate across the United States. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic:

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a regional newspaper:

"In response to petitions from the many farmers and rural landowners throughout our region, the legislature has spent valuable time and effort enacting severe laws to deter motorists from picking fruit off the trees, trampling through the fields, and stealing samples of foliage. But how can our local lawmakers occupy themselves with such petty vandalism when crime and violence plague the nation's cities? The fate of apples and leaves is simply too trivial to merit their attention."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

According to the editorial's author, trespassing, vandalism, and theft related to stealing fruit from farms are minor offenses. Thus lawmakers would be wasting their time if they passed legislation to protect landowners and farmers from these crimes. The author makes the argument that the nation's cities are beset by much more severe issues with crime and violence. It draws a comparison between urban and rural crimes, indicating that rural crimes are not as important as urban crimes, for the legislatures or the lawmakers to do much about. If the author of the editorial has provided any argument at all, it is a weak one.

First, the writer of the letter to the editor believes that taking farmers' produce amounts to minor vandalism. By doing so, he or she is disparaging the labor put in by these farmers, who have a right to demand that their goods be protected. Furthermore, while it is presumed that there are scale thieves—stealing fruits is not that significant—this is not a severe issue. Perhaps when thieves steal, they disrupt a season's worth of harvest, topple fences, and change the crops, causing farmers severe hardship. This makes it impossible to conclude that the vandalism was minor and not that significant.

Second, the idea that lawmakers should be focused on reducing crime and violence creates another unfounded assumption. By assuming this, the author is indicating that what is happening to the farmers is not important. It's likely that crop theft has led to violent altercations, making this an issue that the lawmakers should take very seriously. The author assumes that what is happening is isolated and unimportant, in addition to misunderstanding when and where regulations should be enforced.

Furthermore, it cannot be considered that the fate of apples and leaves is merely insignificant since. If a region, state, or nation depends on these kinds of crops for its economy, then we are discussing the future of these communities. Even if the argument fails to demonstrate how much is stolen from these crops and how much of them are necessary for the region to survive. The author cannot understate how valuable these goods are. As a result, by doing so, he or she is using an unfounded assertion to defend the article.

Also, after giving these things some thought, we can see that the writer's perspective differs from the position of the local legislature. In the text, it is made very obvious that significant efforts have been made to stop what is occurring. After mentioning what the legislature is doing, the author fails to provide proof for their perspective and instead relies on assumptions. It makes the entire post a clear example of their inability to present the case.

Finally, by just comparing rural and urban crime, the author unduly minimizes the seriousness of rural crime. Trespassing, vandalism, and fruit theft may seem like small infractions, especially in comparison to violent urban crimes. Yet depending on the frequency and severity of the offenses, these rural crimes might nevertheless cause considerable financial harm to farm owners. The assertion that these rural crimes are insignificant is not supported by the author's findings. Instead, the author tries to draw attention to a more serious but maybe unrelated issue.

In summation, the argument is feeble and unpersuasive. As a result of the weak support for the assumptions. The conclusion is implausible. The author should include proof that the items that are now being taken are only a few samples. Fruits, and not a situation that may potentially lead to violent criminality. This will help to support their position. It would be helpful to understand why the author believes that what is happening is not significant enough to warrant attention. Why apples and leaves are not crucial to the local economy in order to evaluate the conclusion more effectively. It also misrepresents the options accessible to legislators in the area and divert attention from the actual issue. We will need additional details regarding the geographic breadth of this legislature's authority. The severity of the fruit theft issue in the area in order to analyze it more effectively.

Suggested AWA GMAT Sample

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Petitions From Farmers AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER