
byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams
Reading Passage Question
Perceiving, for all its nicety of functioning in the dark room under strict instructions for accuracy, comprises a highly complex series of little understood psychological processes. For under all conditions, perceiving represents a resultant of two complex sets of specifications. One set describes the conditions of stimulation. This is done either in terms of physical measures such as wave length, or in terms of psychological norms such as in the description of a picture as that picture is seen by “normal” observers under optimal conditions and with a set for accuracy. This first set of specifications we are used to calling “stimulus” factors.
Stimuli, however, do not act upon an indifferent organism. There is never, in the old-fashioned language of G. F. Stout, anoetic sentience. The organism in perception is in one way or another in a state of expectancy about the environment. It is a truism worth repeating that the perceptual effect of a stimulus is necessarily dependent upon the set or expectancy of the organism.
There have been very few systematic efforts to analyze the dimensions of set and to formulate laws regarding the effectiveness of set in perception such as those which describe stimulus-perception relationships. That students of nonsensory or “directive” factors in perception have thus far refrained from any large-scale statement of principles, while it is a mark of admirable modesty in the face of a very confusing array of experimental data, is highly regrettable. For it has prevented the emergence of new hypotheses which, flowing even from premature principles, might serve to test the utility of theories of perception.
The present study, though empirical in nature, is essentially an essay in the theory of perception — or at least that part of the theory of perception which deals with directive factors in the perceiving process. Our basic axiom has already been stated — that perceiving is a process which results from the stimulation of a prepared or eingestellt organism. A second axiom concerns the operation of such directive factors: given a stimulus input of certain characteristics, directive processes in the organism operate to organize the perceptual field in such a way as to maximize percepts relevant to current needs and expectations and to minimize percepts inimical to such needs and expectations. This “minimax” axiom we have referred to elsewhere as the construction-defense balance in perceiving.
All of which is not to say that perception is always wishful or “autistic.” Indeed, that is not the point. “Wishfulness” has to do with the nature of the expectations which are at work and is not a term relevant to the perceiving process as such. By “wishful” we mean an expectation with a low probability of being confirmed by events.
The construction-defense process operates where expectations are “realistic” or where they are “wishful.” In the former case, it is simply a matter of “constructing” a percept which is relevant, say, to the exigencies of locomotion, “defending” against percepts which, though potentially wish-fulfilling, are disruptive to the task of locomotion.
A concern of this paper is also with the perceptual events which occur when perceptual expectancies fail of confirmation — the problem of incongruity.
“Perceiving, for all its nicety of functioning in the dark room under strict instructions for accuracy” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 3 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
- The closest meaning of the word “autistic” in the context of the passage is
- Rational
- Selfish
- Limited
- Irrelevant
- Focussed
Answer: C
Explanation: This particular question states that an autistic person is one who has autism. So the passage states about a disability. Hence option C is the right answer.
- The primary purpose of the author is to show that
- Ultimately the mechanism of perception involves a complex set of processes which are not fully understood.
- The most important factor in the mechanism of perception is essentially the stimulus as it influences the constructive -defense mechanism.
- It is important to understand the directive factors in the perceiving process as they influence the process of perception.
- Incongruity has been given very less attention in experiments and needs to be thoroughly researched.
- There are many factors in perception which we take for granted and hence our axioms are suspect.
Answer: C
Explanation: This particular question states about "perception". This is evident in the first word of the passage. The author implies that it consists of a lot of complex processes and it depends on -the stimulus, and the expectancy of the organism to receive the stimulus. Hence option C is the correct answer.
- Which of the following statements cannot be inferred from the passage?
- The theories of perception are confusing and this can be largely attributed to the complacency among the students of perception.
- Theories of perception need a serious review as the old theories were based on the assumption of an indifferent organism.
- Incongruities would not be perceived if an organism decided to give up in face of non-confirmation of expectations.
- Only A
- A and B
- B and C
- A and C
- A, B and C
Answer: E
Explanation: This particular question states-
Option A states that there is no definite perception that can be inferred. The students have just refrained from large-scale statements of principle, but this does not mean they were complacent.
Option B is INDIFFERENT. The author states that the organism is indifferent to stimulus. So, in this case, the information we perceive depends on stimulation. So, we cannot say that old theories were based on indifferent organisms.
Option C is a clever choice. But this might be a trap if we do not know the meaning of incongruity. Incongruity refers to incompatibility. In the passage, the last para tells us incongruity is a problem for the theory of perception.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions
- In Pre-Incan Andean Communities, Ultimate Control Over all Productive
- The System of Patent-Granting, Which Confers Temporary Monopolies for the Exploitation of New Technologies
- Many Readers Assume that, as a Neoclassical Literary Critic
- Many People Believe that Wages are Lower in Developing Countries than in Developed Countries
- Some Historians Contend that Conditions in the United States During the Second World War
- Most Moviegoers Tend to Sum up all of a Film‘s Features – Acting, Dire
- Conventional Wisdom has it that Large Deficits in the United States Budget Cause Interest Rates to Rise.
- During the Victorian Period, Women Writers were Measured Against A Social
- More Selective than Most Chemical Pesticides in that they Ordinarily Destroy only Unwanted Species
- Comparable Worth, as a Standard Applied to Eliminate Inequities in Pay
- Even More Than Mountainside Slides of Mud or Snow, Naturally Occurring Forest Fires Promote the Survival of Aspen Trees.
- A Recent Study has Provided Clues to Predator-Prey Dynamics in the Late Pleistocene Era.
- During the 1940s and 1950s the United States Government Developed
- Barbara Strozzi was a Singer and Composer of Madrigals, Aria
- The United States Government has a Long-Standing Policy of Using Federal Funds to Keep Small Business Viable.
- When Literary Periods are Defined on the Basis of Men’s Writing, Women’s Writing Must be Forcibly Assimilated
- Over the Past Century, the United States Population has Continued to Grow
- Seeking a Competitive Advantage, Some Professional Service Firms
- Solar Ponds are Bodies of Water in Which Circulation is Incomplete and There is a Very High Salt Concentration that Increases with Depth
- Those Examples of Poetic Justice that Occur in Medieval
Comments