Over the Past Six Years AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Over the Past Six Years AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.
In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention how over the past six years no incidents of employee theft have been reported within 10 companies that were their clients. On further analysis, it has been identified that the security practices of these companies have the method of showing their photo identification batches while they are at work. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared in a memorandum from the directors of a security and safety consulting service:

“Our research indicates that over the past six years no incidents of employee theft have been reported within 10 of the companies that have been our clients. In analyzing the security practices of these 10 companies, we have further learned that each of them requires its employees to wear photo identification badges while at work. In the future, therefore, we should recommend the use of such identification badges to all of our clients.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

In this argument, the author has mentioned how over the past six years no incidents of employee theft have been reported within 10 companies that were their clients. On further analysis, it has been identified that the security practices of these companies have the method of showing their photo identification batches while they are at work. According to the author, their own company should also adopt the approach of showing photo identification batches as a security measure. The author has not shown any statistical evidence in supporting the arguments mentioned.

Firstly, the author has mentioned exactly about 10 of the firms that are their clients. Here, the audience fails to understand the amount of client base, and if the number 10 is a significant portion. To explain this further, if the firm has a total of only these 10 clients then the author can propose the decision of including this safety standard as their modus operandi. The upcoming clients of the firm need to abide by the decision of showing their photo identification batches as a measure of security. But if the firm has around 500 companies, and out of those 500, 10 companies have showcased their security measure to be the stated one. If that is the case, then the employees of those 10 companies are of upstanding nature. Therefore, by forming the argument against a cluster of clients the author could have provided a strong claim.

Secondly, the author in the argument only considered one security approach stated by those 10 companies showing their photo identification badges. The author only concentrated on photo identification badges as the sole way to prevent employee theft in their firm. There should have been more options to be considered as security measures. Had there been numerous security solutions used by the clients, and the photo identification badges being the only component of it, the author would have done injustice to the remaining security systems by suggesting the upcoming clients abide by only the photo identification badges. On the other hand, if the clients have focused on using only the photo identification badges as it is the sole security facility available, then the author should have mentioned the same to avoid confusion among the audience.

Thirdly, the author has mentioned the period of 6 years within which there has been no employee theft. Now, there are no pieces of clue where the author has mentioned choosing that particular duration. If the case was something like this, the firm provides information on the usage of photo identification badges as a method of preventing thefts and/or was replaced by another security firm, then these pieces of evidence could have served as a strength to the author’s argument. It could have also served as a demonstration of the firm’s victory in excelling in security. However, the argument simply ignores the firm’s role in helping in facilitating security. Instead of bolstering, the author has deprived the firm of its development. This way, the author has unknowingly weakened the argument.

In conclusion, it can be said that the author’s incompetence in providing information on how the clients have used the photo identification badges as a way to secure the theft, then their connection with the clients for the past 6 years, the author has provided a vague argument.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Over the Past Six Years AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER