GMAT Critical Reasoning - Our School District Should Not Spend its Money on the New Verbal Advantage Reading Program.

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Question: Our school district should not spend its money on the new Verbal Advantage reading program. After all, our students get all the reading practice they need by studying history and science.
The argument above depends on which the following assumptions?

  1. The Verbal Advantage program would not help the students learn history and science.
  2. Other reading programs are just as effective but less expensive than the Verbal Advantage program.
  3. The Verbal Advantage program involves only reading practice.
  4. Teaching students history and science is more important than teaching them reading skills.
  5. The students can already read well enough to study history and science.

‘Our school district should not spend its money on the new Verbal Advantage reading program.’  – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can by either finding a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer: C

Explanation: This is a GMAT critical reasoning question. This sentence can be answered keeping in mind the logical arguments. The statement follows:
Our school district should not spend its money on the new Verbal Advantage reading program. After all, our students get all the reading practice they need by studying history and science.
So the argument above depends on the following assumptions:

  1. The Verbal Advantage program would not help the students learn history and science.

In option C we can see that it implies a verbal advantage program alone cannot satisfy the above argument. Hence option A is incorrect.

  1. Other reading programs are just as effective but less expensive than the Verbal Advantage program.

In option B we can see that the verbal advantage program is cost-effective. This alone also cannot satisfy the above argument. Hence option B is incorrect.

  1. The Verbal Advantage program involves only reading practice.

In option C we can see that it implies that the program only offers reading practice. Apart from other options from history and science which they get. It offers something else that it would be worth spending the money on. Hence option C is the correct answer.

  1. Teaching students history and science is more important than teaching them reading skills.

Option D is irrelevant. Hence it is an incorrect statement.

  1. The students can already read well enough to study history and science.

In option E we can see that this assumption will weaken the conclusion, otherwise, it will strengthen the conclusion. But alone it cannot satisfy the argument. Hence option E is the incorrect choice.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show