Motorcycle X AWA GMAT Sample

Motorcycle X AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.
In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention how foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, yet they sell just as well. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point.

Topic:

The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper:

“Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for more than 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers—some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X. But there must be some other explanation. After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well. Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the soundtrack.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

In the given argument the author states that the argument lacks noise made by the manufacturer's motorcycle. His argument is not well supported, and the argument lacks a proper explanation. To justify his claim, the author compares American-made cars and foreign cars that were described in the advertisements for motorcycle X. The argument stated reveals some examples of leaps of faith and some ill-defined terminologies.

Firstly, the author concludes that the foreign company would have the option to draw in motorcycle X's clients just because it is selling for less. He neglects to acknowledge that while buying a motorcycle people consider more than the cost. This is particularly valid for long-term resources, for example, a vehicle where purchasing an inferior motorcycle may prompt greater expenses over the long period because of upkeep. Subsequently, besides the value, the brand name may have had an influence on the foreign company's inability to draw in clients. Since motorcycle X has been made in the United States for more than 70 years, it is reasonable to accept that it's anything but a strong position. Compared to motorcycle X the foreign company has quite recently entered the market. And is selling its products as what might give off an impression of being a prudish imitation. Therefore, it is not surprising that shoppers should reconsider their decisions before turning to other brands.

Secondly, the argument uses the baseless similarities involving American-made auto deals to evaluate the motorcycle industry. While the two motorcycles and cars are both classed as vehicles, they are innately extraordinary. Motorcycles as seen from their TV promotions which commonly have voice-overs or awesome music are usually purchased for style. Cars are generally an image of comfort and luxury. The two vehicles focus on a completely different arrangement of buyers. Each group of buyers will have their own preferences and pay special attention to different properties. For instance, one would not smell a watermelon as they would an apple despite the two being natural products. Accordingly, it is unfair and illogical to assume that because quieter foreign cars sell similarly just as American-made cars, quieter foreign motorcycles should sell comparably well as American-made motorcycles too.

Lastly, the article stresses the noise being generated by motorcycle X as one of the main factors for its more grounded deals in spite of there being no proof demonstrating such. Indeed, the TV ad for motorcycle X doesn't feature its noisiness as one of its selling points. In addition, it is said that motorcycle advertisements usually use dubbing or rock music instead of soundtracks. However, the argument allows an enormous extent of liability on the absence of noise by the motorcycle from the foreign company. This is a profound assumption as there had been no investigation done to research the qualities people consider when purchasing a motorcycle. The author might have addressed a review poll to discover why individuals who purchased motorcycle X selected it over their rivals.

Lastly, the argument is flawed. The author remains unconvincing for the above mentioned reasons. The argument can be considerably strengthened if the author had mentioned the relevant facts and details. In order to assess the merit of a certain situation, full knowledge and data consisting of factors must be mentioned. To reinforce the argument, he might have provided a more well-suited correlation and led review surveys to support his statements.

Suggested GMAT AWA Sample

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Motorcycle X AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER