Medical Helicopters AWA GMAT Sample

“Medical helicopters AWA GMAT Sample” is a AWA GMAT Sample. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. GMAT AWA Sample help the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws in the given argument. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The AWA GMAT sample needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently. Candidates can check more GMAT AWA practice papers.

In the AWA GMAT Sample essay, candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. In AWA GMAT Sample Essay, candidates are required to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. They can take any side of the argument but that should be logically explained and proven. The following structure for the AWA GMAT Sample Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: In introduction, the candidates need to first explain and brief about the topic of the given essay. They should clearly mention how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts and figures stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. Candidates must include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention the background and provide reasons. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article. It includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic. This is by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing an argument that criticizes the statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic:

The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper.

The tragic crash of a medical helicopter last week points up a situation that needs to be addressed. The medical-helicopter industry supposedly has more stringent guidelines for training pilots and maintaining equipment than do most other airline industries, but these guidelines do not appear to be working. Statistics reveal that the rate of medical-helicopter accidents is much higher than the rate of accidents for non-medical helicopters or commercial airliners.

Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.

Sample Essay:

In this topic, there is an unfair comparison between medical helicopters and non-medical helicopters. The author doesn’t consider the atmosphere where these two different helicopters work. We can’t compare a bus which is used for daily travel and a bus which is mainly used for an emergency atmosphere. And it is obvious that their infrastructure will be different. So, the conclusion made by the author is not that much reliable.

Medical helicopters are used in emergency situations. In bad weather conditions or in some natural calamities medical helicopters come into the scene. There may be some accidents due to this bad situation, but we can never blame a pilot for that. All the pilots are highly qualified and skilled. Without prior training, no pilot is given charge of a helicopter. Thus, we can never allege a pilot as incapable on the basis of an accident.

Nonmedical helicopters are not used for emergencies. It is used for normal days. Thus, it is easy to tackle a helicopter on a fresh day. The pilots are highly skilled, though sometimes for some internal glitches helicopter crashes. Considering this situation, we can not blame them for the accident. So the conclusion is not at all reliable. They are totally different from medical helicopters. These helicopters are greater in number. Nonmedical helicopters are used for normal use where there is no chance of bad weather. But medical helicopters come to play their role when there is an emergency. So there is no fair ground to compare these two.

On the other hand this report is too vague. There are no clear statistics stated in the report. There is no clear distinction between the minor and major accidents. It will not be fair to compare a minor accident with a major one and blame the airlines. On the basis of the nature of the accidents there must be clear statistics stated in the report. This report is so vague that it is based on only assumptions. Without going deep into the reason it is not considerable to blame the whole airline. So I can’t support the author.

Therefore, there should be clear statistics and fair ground to compare the two – medical helicopters and nonmedical helicopters. It is recognized by all that the pilots of both the helicopters are highly skilled people. Based on accidents we can’t blame the entire airlines or can question the ability of the pilots. The author of the editorial must state the report considering all the possible aspects. This one-sided report can give the wrong impression to the common people.

There may be some suggestions to this report. The author should use a 360 view of the fact. News report is all about presentation. This presentation is vital as it has the immense power to influence people. One-sided reports can have a negative impact on society. So the author should use clear statistics. True reason for these accidents must be dug out and then spread to the people. Wrong allegations can impact the complete airline. There is no strong ground to support this report.

This report will be acceptable if there are clear records of accidents of medical helicopters. The reason for those accidents must be stated clearly. Furthermore, what the accident results is also important to consider. Either it was a major accident or minor one, that must be brought out into the report. After all these, one can make a comparison between the accidents made by medical helicopters. It will still be unfair to compare accidents made by two different kinds of helicopters. This means, there must not be a comparison between medical helicopters and nonmedical helicopters at all.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Medical Helicopters AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER