Manufacturers are Now Required to Make All Cigarette Lighters Child-Resistant GMAT Critical Reasoning

Question - Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the argument below?
Manufacturers are now required to make all cigarette lighters child-resistant by equipping them with safety levers. But this change is unlikely to result in a significant reduction in the number of fires caused by children playing with lighters, because children given the opportunity can figure out how to work the safety levers and
_______.

1. the addition of the safety levers has made lighters more expensive than they were before the requirement was instituted
2. adults are more likely to leave child-resistant lighters than non-child-resistant lighters in places that are accessible to children
3. many of the fires started by young children are quickly detected and extinguished by their parents
4. unlike child-resistant lighters, lighters that are not child-resistant can be operated by children as young as two years old
5. approximately 5,000 fires per year have been attributed to children playing with lighters before the safety levers were required

“Manufacturers are now required to make all cigarette lighters child-resistant” - is a GMAT critical reasoning topic. This GMAT critical comes with five options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument.  Candidates get 65 minutes to answer 36 MCQ questions in the critical reasoning section of the GMAT.

Answer: B
Explanation: This is a GMAT critical reasoning question. An assumption is an implied hypothesis. So we are looking for something that is implied in the argument. In case it is wrong or maybe disable the argument.
The statement given is
Manufacturers are now required to make all cigarette lighters child-resistant by equipping them with safety levers. But this change is unlikely to result in a significant reduction in the number of fires caused by children playing with lighters because children given the opportunity can figure out how to work the safety levers and ………..
This question seeks an additional justification for why it is doubtful that the safety levers will lessen the number of fires started by kids. We need to increase the likelihood that kids will be able to ignite fires because the argument already gives one reason for it—that they can figure out how to operate the safety mechanisms.
Answer A solely discusses costs, which have no bearing on the likelihood of fires.
Answer B says the safety levers won't have much of an impact on the number of fires because they will not only be able to use the lighters but also have access to them.
Answer C merely mentions that flames can be easily put out, not how to prevent kids from starting fires.
Answer D actually refutes the claim, demonstrating that there might be a decrease since little children are unable to start fires.
Answer E does not address whether youngsters will be able to ignite the flames; it merely provides us with the number of fires.
The answer is B

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Sample

• Arnold: I was recently denied a seat on an airline flight GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Women who are married sleep more soundly than women who have never married or lost a partner GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• In anticipation of the coming year, Tecumseh Autos, a national auto manufacturer, GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• In the mid-1990s the United States Supreme Court rendered GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Maggie will either move into her old bedroom at her parents' house GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• The Bears will not attempt a two-point conversion after the upcoming GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• The Dear One Baby Carrier is the safest and most comfortable baby GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• If 10% or more of a planet's total mass is water GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Though the press release and other official statements of oil companies GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Some statisticians claim that the surest way to increase the overall correctness GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• The rise in free, do-it-yourself instructions on the Internet GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• The commissioner has announced that Judge Khalid, ​ GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Studies have shown that a large percentage of car accidents are caused by aggressive driving. GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Jordan: If a business invests the money necessary to implement ecologically sound practices, GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• All teas are served hot or iced. Most coffees are served hot or iced and always contain caffeine. GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• When an auto insurance policy compensates the owners of stolen or burglarized cars GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• Research has shown that impoverished people in this country buy unhealthy snack foods GMAT Critical Reasoning 
• A management protocol system that offers a unique method for the administration GMAT Critical Reasoning