Kooclaka is a Full-Line Vending Business, Which uses Vending Machines to Sell Cans or Bottles

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Question: Kooclaka is a full-line vending business, which uses vending machines to sell cans or bottles of soft drinks and individual packages of snacks. When the management of Kooclaka considered whether to fill vending machines in hospitals with 330ml or 500ml cans or bottles, it decided to sell only 500ml bottles, because patients do not leave their beds very often, thus they prefer a larger, reusable bottle.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

  1. All Kooclaka’s products are manufactured by the same manufacturer.
  2. The revenues from selling 500ml bottles are 5% less than for 500ml cans.
  3. Kooclaka’s competitors sell only 500ml bottles in hospitals.
  4. More 330ml bottles than 500ml bottles can be put in a vending machine.
  5. The average number of visitors is 2.3 per hospital patient.

“Kooclaka is a Full-Line Vending Business, Which uses Vending Machines to Sell Cans or Bottles”- is a GMAT Critical question. This particular GMAT Critical Reasoning topic has been taken from the book ‘Manhattan Prep GMAT Critical Reasoning 6th Edition’. In this particular topic candidates need to choose the option that best suits the passage. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. Critical reasoning in GMAT requires candidates to find the strengths and weaknesses of the argument, or find the logical flaw in the argument.  The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer:
Explanation:

A GMAT Critical Reasoning section comprises some facts and arguments. GMAT critical reasoning tests the reasoning abilities of the candidates. The candidate has to find out the correct option by finding the logically correct argument or by eliminating the irrelevant arguments.
Let us consider the given options to check the assumption that most seriously weakens the argument:

  1. Incorrect.
    -In option A the argument is irrelevant to the question asked. It doesn’t matter if the products are manufactured by the same manufacturer or not.
  2. Correct.
    -In option B we can see that if cans make more profit for the firm then cans should be preferred over bottles
  3. Irrelevant
    -In option C the argument has no relevance to the question asked. It doesn’t matter if the bottles are 500 ml or 330ml.
  4. Incorrect.
    -In option D it is clearly written that patients prefer 500ml bottles more than 330ml. Very few people will opt for 330ml bottles.
  5. Incorrect.
    -In option E the average tells us nothing about the argument and how to weaken it.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show