Reading Passage Question
It was once assumed that all living things could be divided into two fundamental and exhaustive categories. Multicellular plants and animals, as well as many unicellular organisms, are eukaryotic—their large, complex cells have a well-formed nucleus and many organelles. On the other hand, the true bacteria are prokaryotic cell, which are simple and lack a nucleus. The distinction between eukaryotes and bacteria, initially defined in terms of subcellular structures visible with a microscope, was ultimately carried to the molecular level. Here prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have many features in common. For instance, they translate genetic information into proteins according to the same type of genetic coding. But even where the molecular processes are the same, the details in the two forms are different and characteristic of the respective forms. For example, the amino acid sequences of various enzymes tend to be typically prokaryotic or eukaryotic. The differences between the groups and the similarities within each group made it seem certain to most biologists that the tree of life had only two stems. Moreover, arguments pointing out the extent of both structural and functional differences between eukaryotes and true bacteria convinced many biologists that the precursors of the eukaryotes must have diverged from the common ancestor before the bacteria arose.
Although much of this picture has been sustained by more recent research, it seems fundamentally wrong in one respect. Among the bacteria, there are organisms that are significantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and from the true bacteria, and it now appears that there are three stems in the tree of life. New techniques for determining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms have produced evolutionary information about the degree to which organisms are related, the time since they diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versions of genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that although the true bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria, which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria, represent a distinct evolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all true bacteria.
“It was once assumed that all living things could be divided into two fundamental and exhaustive categories”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 8 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
- The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) detailing the evidence that has led most biologists to replace the trichotomous picture of living organisms with a dichotomous one
(B) outlining the factors that have contributed to the current hypothesis concerning the number of basic categories of living organisms
(C) evaluating experiments that have resulted in proof that the prokaryotes are more ancient than had been expected
(D) summarizing the differences in structure and function found among true bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes
(E) formulating a hypothesis about the mechanisms of evolution that resulted in the ancestors of the prokaryotes
Answer: B
Explanation: The passage is mainly focused in outlining the factors contributing to the hypothesis on the number of categories of living organisms. Therefore, the right choice is option B. Option A is wrong. Passage says other way round. Option C can be ruled out. Passage suggest Archebachetria are older than prokaryotes (true bacteria). Option D is incorrect. First paragraph discusses “differences in structure and function found among true bacteria, and eukaryotes”. Moreover it is not complete passage in itself. There is no hypothesis formulated. Only result of studies are given. So option E is incorrect.
- According to the passage, investigations of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells at the molecular level supported the conclusion that
(A) most eukaryotic organisms are unicellular
(B) complex cells have well-formed nuclei
(C) prokaryotes and eukaryotes form two fundamental categories
(D) subcellular structures are visible with a microscope
(E) prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have similar enzymes
Answer: C
Explanation: This is explained in first paragraph. From “Here prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have many features in common” to end of the paragraph 1. It is all about molecular similarities and differences. Investigations of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells at the molecular level supported that prokaryotes and eukaryotes form two fundamentally different categories. As stated, “The differences between the groups and the similarities within each group made it seem certain to most biologists that the tree of life had only two stems”
- According to the passage, which of the following statements about the two-category hypothesis is likely to be true?
(A) It is promising because it explains the presence of true bacteria-like organisms such as organelles in eukaryotic cells.
(B) It is promising because it explains why eukaryotic cells, unlike prokaryotic cells, tend to form multicellular organisms.
(C) It is flawed because it fails to account for the great variety among eukaryotic organisms.
(D) It is flawed because it fails to account for the similarity between prokaryotes and eukaryotes
(E) It is flawed because it fails to recognize an important distinction among prokaryotes.
Answer: E
Explanation: There is a third divison which is kind of “prokaryotes” but predates it. Two-category hypothesis is flawed. This is because it fails to recognise the importance of distinction among prokaryotes. As seen paragraph 1, “tree of life” has two stems. But the second paragraph says that “tree of life” has 3 stems. So “two-category hypothesis” is not promising, it is flawed.
- It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following have recently been compared in order to clarify the fundamental classifications of living things?
(A) The genetic coding in true bacteria and that in other prokaryotes
(B) The organelle structures of archaebacteria, true bacteria, and eukaryotes
(C) The cellular structures of multicellular organisms and unicellular organisms
(D) The molecular sequences in eukaryotic RNA, true bacterial RNA, and archaebacterial RNA
(E) The amino acid sequences in enzymes of various eukaryotic species and those of enzymes in archaebacterial species
Answer: D
Explanation: The molecular sequences in eukaryotic RNA, true bacterial RNA, and archaebacterial RNA have been compared. This is to determine the fundamental classification of living organisms. The second paragraph says “New techniques for determining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms”. So most probably it is study of molecular sequences of RNA.
- If the “new techniques” mentioned in line 31 were applied in studies of biological classifications other than bacteria, which of the following is most likely?
(A) Some of those classifications will have to be reevaluated.
(B) Many species of bacteria will be reclassified.
(C) It will be determined that there are four main categories of living things rather than three.
(D) It will be found that true bacteria are much older than eukaryotes
(E) It will be found that there is a common ancestor of the eukaryotes, archaebacteria, and true bacteria.
Answer: A
Explanation: As study of bacteria revealed different classification so there are chances that study of other life form may also yield similar support. If the “new techniques” are applied to classification other than bacteria than some of them need to be reevaluated.
- According to the passage, researchers working under the two-category hypothesis were correct in thinking that
(A) prokaryotes form a coherent group
(B) the common ancestor of all living things had complex properties
(C) eukaryotes are fundamentally different from true bacteria
(D) true bacteria are just as complex as eukaryotes
(E) ancestral versions of eukaryotic genes functioned differently from their modern counterparts
Answer: C
Explanation: The researchers working in two-category hypothesis were right in stating that eukaryotes are fundamentally different from true bacteria. Option A, B, D and E are not supported. Therefore, they can be ruled out.
- All of the following statements are supported by the passage EXCEPT:
(A) True bacteria form a distinct evolutionary group.
(B) Archaebacteria are prokaryotes that resemble true bacteria.
(C) True bacteria and eukaryotes employ similar types of genetic coding.
(D) True bacteria and eukaryotes are distinguishable at the subcellular level
(E) Amino acid sequences of enzymes are uniform for eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms.
Answer: E
Explanation: Option A is true. As staed, “there are organisms that are significantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and from the true bacteria” Option B can be inferred. “The archae bacteria , which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria” Option C can be inferred. “RNA of organisms have produced evolutionary information about the degree to which organisms are related” Option D is mentioned. “The distinction between eukaryotes and bacteria, initially defined in terms of sub cellular structures visible with a microscope” Option E is false. So this makes the right option. “The amino acid sequences of various enzymes tend to be typically prokaryotic or eukaryotic.” The passage states that amino acid sequences are typically either prokaryotic or eukaryotic hence, are not uniform.
- The author’s attitude toward the view that living things are divided into three categories is best described as one of
(A) tentative acceptance
(B) mild skepticism
(C) limited denial
(D) studious criticism
(E) whole hearted endorsement
Answer: A
Explanation: Paraph 2 says “it now appears that there are three stems in the tree of life”. Which inidiates that author is sort of accepting it. The author’s view on the division of living organisms is described as a tentative acceptance of the classification. Therefore, option A justifies the answer.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions
- A One-Child Policy was Implemented in China in 1979 GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Seeking a Competitive Advantage, Some Professional Service Firms GMAT Reading Comprehension
- On the surface, the Conquest of the Aztec Empire by Herman Cortes GMAT Reading Comprehension
- But Man is Not Destined to Vanish. He can be Killed, but he cannot be Destroyed, Because his Soul is Deathless and his Spirit is Irrepressible GMAT Reading Comprehension
- When Literary Periods are Defined on the Basis of Men’s Writing, Women’s Writing Must be Forcibly Assimilated GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Behind Every Book Review There are Two Key Figures: A Book Review Editor and A Reviewer GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Barbara Strozzi was a Singer and Composer of Madrigals, Aria GMAT Reading Comprehension
- During the Victorian Period, Women Writers were Measured Against A Social GMAT Reading Comprehension
- It Is Perhaps Not Surprising that Debate has Arisen Over Bioluminescence-Based Biotechnologies GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Fact that Superior Service can Generate a Competitive Advantage GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Origin of the Attempt to Distinguish Early from Modern Music GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Phenomenon of College Basketball's Surging Popularity Remains a Challenge to Classify GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Those Examples of Poetic Justice that Occur in Medieval GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Virginia Woolf Made an Original Contribution to the Form of the Novel GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Insanity Defence in the Legal Proceedings Follows from the Assumption GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Although the Journal Social Text was Never at the Forefront of Publishing Articles on Feminism GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Anthropologist Ralph Linton, In Categorizing Native American Movements GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Critics have Long been Puzzled by the Inner Contradictions of Major Characters in John Webster’s Tragedies GMAT Reading Comprehension
- During the 1940s and 1950s the United States Government Developed GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments