It is Still an Open Question Precisely How Hobbes Conceptualized the State of Nature

Reading Passage Question

It is still an open question precisely how Hobbes conceptualized the state of nature; neither he nor his interpreters have been completely clear. Hobbes offers three scenarios. In De Cive, the state of nature is an empirical physical location in which war ―is perpetuated in its own nature….They of America are examples hereof.In Leviathan, Hobbes appears to conceive of the state of nature as a facet of personality, accessible through introspection or intuition: ―Nosce teipsum, read thyself…whosoever looketh into himself…shall thereby read and know what are the thoughts and passions of all other men.

In De Corpore, Hobbes suggests that principles of human nature can be derived by ratiocination from ―the first part of philosophy, namely, geometry and physics.Among Hobbes scholars consensus lacks regarding how, and indeed whether, these scenarios reconcile. Conclusions seem to change sometimes within a single tract. Within the space of two lines in Konstantin‘s influential Leviathan Logic, the state of nature changes from a mere ―act of imagination into a far more ambitious ―ideal conception.(What is more, Konstantin‘s assertion that the state of nature could never be empirically observed contradicts Hobbes‘s own reference to ―they of America.) LaJoie calls the state of nature a creation of logic, not history,while for Saccente the state of nature is a ―thought-experiment designed not to chronicle the essential condition of humankind, but to illuminate it.

It has long been a commonplace idea that a state of nature is the conceptual starting point of Hobbesian political thought. A war in which ―every man is Enemy to every man‖ chiefly characterizes this state in which, because of limited resources and the absence of any summum bonum to fortify a moral order, anarchy rules and life is never without wantand fear. Even scholars who offer otherwise contrasting readings of Hobbes agree that its foundation is the state of nature. For LaJoie, Hobbes‘s stateof nature ―sets in motion the dominoes of deduction‖ from which ultimately issue the politics proper. Saccente cautions against framing Hobbes Thought within an ―architectural analogue according to which the state of nature is the foundation of a structure and civil philosophy is its roof, yet she too maintains that for Hobbes ―civil philosophy begins with knowledge of human nature.Hobbes presents no exception to the rule that at the outset, every social theorist, whatever else he or she argues, of necessity makes fundamental and seminal assumptions concerning human nature.

To the extent that it involves a politics—what Hobbes calls civil philosophy—built on a philosophy of human nature, Hobbes‘s thought constitutes a system in which the problems of political life in civil society are intertwined with the basic nature of the human condition. By this view, humankind exists in a universe the entire content of which is no more or less than matter and motion. A strict, raw, nominalist materialism circumscribes reality in this billiard-ball world of efficient causes, which manifest in personality as the passions that drive behavior.

What is usually termed will is unreal, nothing more than the final derivative of appetite or aversion. To understand the operation of these passions in human behavior, we are invited by Hobbes to explore a setting in which nothing impedes people‘s acting on appetites and aversions. This setting is, of course, the state of nature. In addition to the absence in this state of any positive law, there is also no natural law in the scholastic sense of providentially-prescribed rational commands of right conduct for everyone. ‗Good‘ is radically individual and utilitarian; it is always and only that to which appetite or aversion drives a person. Possessed of a natural liberty to compete for limited resources and to win what security they can by whatever means they choose, actors in the natural state vie, according to the famous phrase, for ―Power after power, that ceaseth only on Death.

“It is still an open question precisely how Hobbes conceptualized the state of nature”-is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 3 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. Of all of the following, which is NOT addressed by the author in the passage?
  1. The relationship between physics and human nature
  2. Hobbes‘s basic conception of the nature of universe
  3. The role of self-reflection in relation to the principles of human nature
  4. The requirements for emergence from the state of nature into civil society
  5. Hobbe‘s definition of will

Answer: D
Explanation:
The above mentioned statement in option D is never discussed in the passage. There is no clear explanation for the statement. Thus option D is correct. Civil society is never discussed here. State of nature is explained in many ways but there is no clear explanation of the relationship of nature and civil society.

  1. Which of the following best characterizes the claim made in the Highlighted text?
  1. It supports a viewpoint regarded by the author as widespread but groundless.
  2. It is at odds with the subsequent claim that Hobbes‘s conception of the state of nature is an open question.
  3. It broadens the scope of a claim with which the author agrees.
  4. It demonstrates the systemic character of Hobbesian thought.
  5. It narrows the views of the author about a particular claim

Answer: C
Explanation:
There are many other persons who address the theory in different manners. All the perspectives broaden the claim. These claims are useful in understanding Hobbes theory. Thus, option C is correct .

  1. According to the author, which of the following would be most analogous to conditions in the state of nature?
  1. In a nuclear family, parents allow children to share in decision-making as the children develop a capacity to communicate increasingly thoughtful opinions.
  2. In warfare, belligerents adhere to principles such as proportionality, non-combatant immunity, and other norms of the just war principle.
  3. In international politics, sovereign states pursue their individual interests without reference to an overarching authority whose laws are backed by the threat of coercive force.
  4. In a crime-ridden neighbourhood, a paroled criminal burgles homes and businesses despite the emergence of a vigilante group of neighbourhood residents convinced that police are incapable of capturing the criminal.
  5. In a classroom one student is punished severely for not having completed his homework while another is pardoned for the same

Answer: C
Explanation:
According to Hobbes, the state of nature is determined by individuals. Individual interest is the main basis of the status of nature and it is very clearly stated in the option. Thus, option C is the best fit.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show