It Does Not Take Much for People to Lose Confidence in Vaccines.

Reading Passage Question

It does not take much for people to lose confidence in vaccines. When a few Europeans who had received the AstraZeneca (az) shot for covid-19 suffered unusual blood clotting that was sometimes fatal, many countries in the European Union stopped using it. They say this shows they take safety seriously. Unfortunately, their caution is more likely to cost lives.

The suspensions began after Norway reported four cases of blood clotting in adults given the az vaccine. Similar reports have come from other European countries. Within days at least 16 of them, including Germany, France and Italy, had called a halt. The World Health Organisation, the European Medicines Agency (ema) and the regulator in Britain, where the az vaccine has been used abundantly, urged people to keep getting jabbed.

On March 18th the EMA confirmed this advice. It is hard to see how it could have reached any other conclusion. The az vaccine, like others, has been shown to be safe in millions of people.

Any confusion lies in the difficulty of disentangling causation from correlation. The ema reckons that as of March 10th there had been 30 “thromboembolic events” among the 5m people in the eu who have received az’s vaccine. By itself, that is no more remarkable than the fact that some of them will have suddenly had relief from chronic back pain or seen their cancer go into remission. The question is whether the rates are higher than would otherwise be expected. With clots, even as evidence from specific cases needs investigating, the mass of overall data shows that the vaccines are safe.

In clinical trials 38% of those given the jab reported at least one side-effect, chiefly things like pain at the injection site, a headache or brief fever. So did 28% of those who got a dummy injection. Less than 1% of either group went on to suffer any serious illness. Of those who did, more had been given the placebo. Trial data are backed up by mass-vaccination experience in other countries. Britain has administered more than 10m doses of each of the az vaccine and the one made by Pfizer, an American firm. Its medicines regulator reckons that both vaccines cause between three and six reports of side-effects for every 1,000 doses delivered, almost all of which are mild.

Even if it turns out to entail a minuscule risk of clotting disorders, vaccination is likely to be many, many times less dangerous than catching covid-19. People routinely undertake activities that involve a small risk of blood clots, such as flying, taking birth-control pills, smoking and eating unhealthily.

European officials have described the suspensions as temporary precautions. When the evidence is in, programmes can pick up where they left off—and the public will be reassured. That logic is wrong on two counts. One is that, while vaccination is halted, people will contract covid-19. Precautionary regulation would have continued with vaccination while the clotting was investigated because, given the prevalence of the disease in Europe, which is growing, that would minimize death and suffering. The other mistake is that doubts caused by a temporary halt are likely to persist.

Consider other vaccines. Many rich countries inoculate children against human papillomavirus (hpv), which causes cervical cancer. After anecdotal reports of side-effects in 2013, Japan stopped recommending the hpv vaccine. No amount of evidence of the safety of the hpv vaccine has persuaded it to change its mind. One paper estimates that between 5,000 and 5,700 Japanese women born between 1994 and 2007 will die as a result.

Some European medics allege that their countries suspended their vaccination programmes partly out of eu “solidarity” or frustration with eu bureaucrats telling them how to deal with the pandemic. If so, that will rebound on them. If the death toll mounts and vaccination rates remain stubbornly low, expect recriminations to fly. And rightly so.

“It does not take much for people to lose confidence in vaccines.” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 3 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. According to the passage, which of the following statements is true?
  1. European Medicines Agency (EMA) has ignored the warnings issued by the EU countries
  2. Separating causation and correlation is hard
  3. Norway was one of the first countries to suspend vaccinations
  4. Side effects of thromboembolic events were not remarkable
  5. The AZ vaccine appears to have a higher side effect rate than the Pfizer vaccine

Answer: B
Explanation: The third paragraph of the passage states that “Any confusion …. disentangling causation from correlation.” This means that separating causation from correlation is hard. This is exactly what option B says. Hence, B is the correct answer.

  1. According to the passage the author implies which of the following?
  1. As long as the AZ vaccine causes less than 0.0005% side effect rate, it is worth taking
  2. The Pfizer vaccine has been administered more widely but has the same side effect rate
  3. People are willing to take the AZ vaccine even if there is a small risk of thromboembolic events
  4. The AZ vaccine is not as popular as Pfizer vaccine due to the recent concerns surrounding thromboembolic events
  5. People who are likely to get blood clots should not get the AZ vaccine

Answer: A
Explanation: The author mentions that taking this vaccine is not risky. He mentioned two statistics to suggest his claim:
30 “thromboembolic events” among the 5m people(30/5m = 0.000006%).
The author said that almost all doses are mild. The author also mentioned if the side effect rate is within the control, it is safe. Hence, A is the correct answer.

  1. The main purpose of the passage is:
  1. To outline the risk of the AZ vaccine
  2. To dispel the rumors surrounding covid-19 vaccines and encourage people to get vaccinated
  3. To argue that caution is not the right approach with covid-19
  4. To highlight a flaw in the vaccine deployment plan
  5. To provide examples from past vaccination campaigns and how certain events negatively impacted vaccine distribution

Answer: B
Explanation: In the passage, the author discusses the side effects of the vaccine and how some are false. This means that some are rumors. The author also states the facts and informs people to take vaccines. Hence, B is the correct answer.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show