Initially the Vinaver Theory That Malory’s Eight Romances, Once Thought to be Fundamentally Unified

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Reading Passage Question

Initially the Vinaver theory that Malory’s eight romances, once thought to be fundamentally unified, were in fact eight independent works produced both a sense of relief and an unpleasant shock. Vinaver’s theory comfortably explained away the apparent contradictions of chronology and made each romance independently satisfying. It was, however, disagreeable to find that what had been thought of as one book was now eight books. Part of this response was the natural reaction to the disturbance of set ideas. Nevertheless, even now,after lengthy considerations of the theory’s refined but legitimate observations, one cannot avoid the conclusion that the eight romances are only one work. It is not quite a matter of disagreeing with the theory of independence, but of rejecting its implications: that the romances may be taken in any or no particular order, that they have no cumulative effect, and that they are as separate as the works of any modern novelist.

“Initially the Vinaver theory that Malory’s eight romances, once thought to be fundamentally unified”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 4 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

Q1) The primary purpose of the passage is to

  1. discuss the validity of a hypothesis
  2. summarise a system of general principles
  3. propose guidelines for future arguments
  4. stipulate conditions for acceptance of an interpretation
  5. deny accusations about an apparent contradiction

Answer: A
Explanation
:
This particular question states that Vinaver’s theory is comfortably explained. The apparent contradictions of chronology made each romance independently satisfying. Hence option A is the correct answer.

Q2) It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following about Malory’s works?

  1. There are meaningful links between and about the romances
  2. The subtleties of the romances are obscured when they are taken as one work
  3. Any contradictions in chronology among the romances are less important than their overall unity
  1. I only
  2. III only
  3. I and III only
  4. II and III only
  5. I, II and III

Answer: C
Explanation: This particular question states lengthy considerations of the theory. The theory was refined but cannot avoid the conclusion that the eight romances are only one work. It rejects implications that the romances may be taken in any or no particular order. Hence option C is the correct answer.

Q3) The author of the passage concedes which of the following about Vinaver’s theory?

  1. It gives a clearer understanding of the unity of Malory’s romances
  2. It demonstrates the irrationality of considering Malory’s romances to be unified.
  3. It establishes acceptable links between Malory’s romances and modern novels.
  4. It unifies earlier and later theories concerning the chronology of Malory’s romances.
  5. It makes valid and subtle comments about Malory’s romances.

Answer: E
Explanation: This particular question states that Vinaver’s theory is refined but legitimate observations. Hence option E is the correct answer.

Q4) It can be inferred from the passage that in evaluating the Vinaver theory, some critics were

  1. Frequently misled by the inconsistencies in Malory’s work.
  2. Initially biased by previous interpretations of Malory’s work.
  3. Conceptually displeased by the general interpretations that Vinaver rejected.
  4. Generally in agreement with Vinaver’s comparisons between Malory and modern novelists
  5. Originally skeptical about Vinaver’s early conclusions with respect to modern novels.

Answer: B
Explanation
:
This particular question states the natural reaction to the disturbance of set ideas. Though it is not a matter of disagreement with the theory of independence, rejecting its implications. Hence, this implies Malory's work was initially biased. Hence option B is the correct answer.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show