In Ursula Leguins Short Story The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas GMAT Reading Comprehension

Reading Passage Question

In Ursula LeGuin’s short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” everyone in the city of Omelas is happy—everyone, that is, except the child who is kept locked in a basement closet. The child is left entirely alone and neglected except for occasional visits from the citizens of Omelas. They come at a certain age as a rite of initiation, to learn the secret of the happiness they enjoy. They come to learn that their happiness has a price: the suffering of an innocent child. In the end, most people stay in Omelas; but a few, unable to bear the fact that they are responsible for the suffering of that child, reject this utopia built upon a utilitarian morality.

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory based upon the belief that happiness is the ultimate good and that people should use happiness as the measure for determining right and wrong. For utilitarians, the right thing to do is that which will bring about the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Furthermore, utilitarianism argues that the intention of people’s actions does not matter; only the consequences of their actions are morally relevant because only the consequences determine how much happiness is produced.

Although many useful social policies and much legislation are founded on this “greatest good” philosophy, utilitarianism can be problematic as a basis for morality. First, happiness is not so easy to quantify, and any measurement is bound to be subjective. Second, in a theory that treats everything except happiness as instrumentally rather than intrinsically valuable, anything—or, more importantly, anyone—can (and should) be treated as a means to an end, if it means greater happiness. This rejects the notion that human beings have their own intrinsic value. Further, utilitarianism puts the burden of the happiness of the masses on the suffering of the few. Is the happiness of many worth the suffering of a few? Why do those few deserve to suffer? Isn’t this burden of suffering morally irresponsible? This is the dilemma so brilliantly illustrated in LeGuin’s story.

“In Ursula LeGuins short story The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”- is a passage for the GMAT that addresses reading comprehension. Candidates must have a firm understanding of GMAT reading comprehension in English. This GMAT reading comprehension section consists of five comprehension questions. The purpose of the GMAT Reading Comprehension questions is to assess a candidate's capacity to understand, evaluate, and apply knowledge or ideas. By responding to the GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions section, candidates can actively practice.

Solutions and Explanation

  1. Which of the following best sums up the author’s opinion of utilitarianism?
  1. It is an ethical theory.
  2. It is the ethical theory that people should all live by.
  3. It is a useful but problematic ethical theory.
  4. It does not adequately measure happiness.
  5. It underestimates the intrinsic value of human beings.

Answer: C
Explanation:
Although the author criticizes utilitarianism, she also provides support for the theory's usefulness. LeGuin's tale, for instance, exemplifies how one person's sacrifice can result in the happiness of many. The author's use of language throughout also suggests that she believes this ethical theory has both advantages and disadvantages. She uses the word "problematic" rather than "wrongheaded" or "faulty," for instance. The statement in the third option corresponds with this and therefore it is the right answer.

  1. According to the passage, in utilitarianism
  1. only intentions have moral significance.
  2. consequences are important, but intentions are more important.
  3. intentions and consequences are equally important.
  4. intentions are important, but consequences are more important.
  5. only consequences have moral significance.

Answer: E
Explanation:
The passage claims that according to utilitarianism, people's intentions are irrelevant. Only the consequences of their deeds are morally significant because only the results determine how much happiness is generated. The statement in the final option accurately describes this meaning. It is therefore the correct answer. The rest of the options are all wrong answers as they cannot be correctly inferred with this.

  1. The author summarizes LeGuin’s story primarily to
  1. show how good the story is.
  2. get readers interested in the story.
  3. illustrate the power of words.
  4. illustrate the central problem with utilitarianism.
  5. illustrate a utilitarian utopia.

Answer: D
Explanation:
From the passage it can be understood that the main goal of the author's summary of LeGuin's tale is to highlight the fundamental flaw in utilitarianism. The statement in the fourth option corresponds with this and therefore it is the correct answer. The remaining options are all wrong answers as they are not consistent.

  1. From the passage, it can be inferred that the author
  1. may use utilitarianism occasionally but not as a guiding moral principle.
  2. would never use utilitarianism to make a decision about what is right or wrong.
  3. uses utilitarianism regularly to make moral decisions.
  4. believes utilitarianism is a good basis for social policy.
  5. things most people do not really understand utilitarianism.

Answer: A
Explanation:
The first option is the right answer. This is because it can be inferred from the passage that while the author may occasionally use utilitarianism, it is not a guiding moral principle. The remaining options are wrong answers as they have distorted information or have too far-fetched statements.

  1. From the author’s summary of LeGuin’s story, the reader can infer that
  1. most people in Omelas are utilitarians.
  2. most people in Omelas reject utilitarianism.
  3. everyone in Omelas is happy.
  4. the child willingly sacrifices himself for others.
  5. LeGuin is a popular science-fiction writer.

Answer: A
Explanation:
The majority of people in Omelas are utilitarians. This is something that the reader can infer from the author's summary of LeGuin's tale. As a result, the first option is the right answer as it can clearly say this. The rest of the options are all invalid answers as they are not accurate interpretations.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show