In City Cyclemania, All the Bicycles were Painted Black GMAT Critical Reasoning

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Question: In City Cyclemania, all the bicycles were painted black.
Which of the following can properly be inferred from the statement above?

  1. In City Cyclemania, if there is an item which is black, it must be a bicycle.
  2. If a bicycle is not a bicycle from City Cyclemania, then it is not black.
  3. If an item from City Cyclemania is not black, then it cannot be a bicycle.
  4. Bicycles are painted black to help prevent thefts.
  5. The city believes that a uniform color for bicycles looks good.

“In City Cyclemania, all the bicycles were painted black” – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer: B
Explanation
:

Test takers' critical thinking and analytical skills are put to the test in the GMAT's critical reasoning part. The candidate needs strong cognitive abilities to come up with a coherent answer.

Let's look at each option separately.

A: Inaccurate

It is not the right decision. You must identify a conclusion that follows from the given premises because this is an inference question.
All of the bicycles in Cyclemania were painted black, which leads to the following conclusion:
This response option deviates too much from the stated premise, which simply specifies that the bikes there be black; other objects may also be black.

B: Inaccurate

Since we are aware that every bicycle in Cyclemania was painted black, anything that is not black cannot be a bicycle. It is an incorrect choice.

C: Correct

It is the correct choice. Since we are aware that every bicycle in Cyclemania was painted black, anything that is not black cannot be a bicycle.

D: Inaccurate

It is not the best option. The sole components of this inference question are the premises, thus you must identify a conclusion that follows logically from these.
All of the bicycles in Cyclemania were painted black, therefore what follows from Premise A?
The provided assumption merely indicates that the bikes are black; other objects may also be black. This response choice veers too far from that premise.

E: Inaccurate

E is an incorrect choice. Given that we don't know why the bikes were painted black, this response option veers too far from the thesis.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show