In a Seven to Four Vote Last Week, Crane County Officials Decided to Raise GMAT Sentence Correction

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Question:  In a seven to four vote last week, Crane County officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be reduced.

  1. it might have been expected for it to be reduced
  2. they might have been expected to have reduced them
  3. they might have been expected that it should be reduced
  4. its reducing might have been expected
  5. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced

“In a seven to four vote last week, Crane County officials decided” - is a GMAT sentence correction question. These types of questions contain grammatical errors in the underlined sentence, and we have to choose the correct statement from the options. GMAT sentence correction is part of GMAT verbal.

Answer: B

Explanation:

The modification that is requested to be made to the presented phrase can be validated by following the guidelines that are provided below:

  • Parallelism
  • Examination of two distinct aspects
  • Modifiers

The following is the sentence structure:

The Crane County Board of Commissioners made the decision last week to increase property taxes by a vote of seven to four, despite the fact that it was likely anticipated that the rate would be decreased.

Option A: Incorrect

A is the incorrect answer. The only reason for it to be incorrect is the fact that it has no precedent. Also, it can be noticed that both officials and taxes are plurals.

Option B: Correct

Choice B is the correct choice. Although it might not be obvious at first glance, this statement is a continuation of the one that came before it. "Even though officials raise taxes, we anticipate them to lower them in the future." When integrated into the context of the statement, this option makes perfect sense.

Option C: Incorrect

This choice is not the proper one. Given that we have both officials and taxes, the answer to this question is obvious. But there is one thing that cannot be disputed. That is to say that the phrase "it should be lowered" does not have a referent. Because of this, selecting option C can be somewhat confusing.

Option D: Incorrect

This is incorrect. It is erroneous since the term "its" is being used in this context. The possessive noun "its" does not have an antecedent of any kind. Or, we may express it from the perspective of logic with an antecedent that it does not agree with.

Option E: Incorrect

This is the wrong decision.It is implicit in the structure of the word that "Someone" will carry out the action. Therefore, there may have been an expectation regarding this matter; yet, "the person expected". It does not make any reference to the individual who was anticipated, and "for them to be decreased" does not adhere to the logic of the term. There is no way for taxes to lower themselves; it must be done by another party.

Suggested GMAT Sentence Correction Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show