In 1996, the State of Arizona Introduced a Statute GMAT Reading Comprehension

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Reading Passage Question

In 1996, the State of Arizona introduced a statute that divests the juvenile court of jurisdiction over juvenile offenders fifteen years of age or older who are accused of first and second-degree murder, forcible sexual
(5) assault, armed robbery, or other violent felony offenses. Opponents have rightfully argued that assigning automatic criminal responsibility to juveniles based solely on their age and the type of offense with which they are charged, many of the extenuating circumstances
(10) that would have previously been considered by juvenile court judges are now largely irrelevant. In fact, if the prosecution finds sufficient grounds for charging a the juvenile offender with, say, armed robbery, juvenile court review will be entirely bypassed and the offender
(15) will automatically be tried in criminal court as an adult. The choice of court, therefore, rests entirely in the discretion of the prosecution. Regrettably, courts have been reluctant to question the constitutionality of such discretion and little hope remains that they would
(20) subject it to judicial review any time soon.

‘In 1996, the State of Arizona introduced a statute’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analysing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. The author mentions armed robbery (line 13) primarily in order to

(A) provide an example of a type of offense with which offenders are rarely charged in juvenile court
(B) show how the prosecution can automatically decide a jurisdictional issue involving some juvenile offenders
(C) illustrate a type of offense that the new statute will make more difficult to prosecute
(D) explain why extenuating circumstances must be considered when assigning criminal responsibility to juvenile offenders
(E) emphasize the severity of the offenses that are typically considered only in cases tried in criminal court

Answer: B
Explanation:
In actuality, the phrase "if the prosecution thinks it essential, as an adult" suggests that if the prosecution has sufficient evidence. The kid committed the crime, the juvenile court's review process can be avoided and the case can be reviewed in criminal court immediately. So, B is the appropriate response.

  1. Which one of the following words employed by the author is most indicative of the author’s attitude toward the ability of prosecutors to bypass juvenile court review following the passage of the new statute?

(A) rightfully
(B) hope
(C) regrettably
(D) reluctant
(E) divests

Answer: C
Explanation:
The answer is most certainly C because the authors claim in the text that courts have been reluctant to consider. The legitimacy of such discretion, little chance exists that they would (20) submit it to judicial examination any time soon.
Unfortunately, the courts have not even challenged the statute or asked that it be altered, despite the author's disagreement with it.

  1. The passage suggests which one of the following about a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996?

(A) The offender could be prosecuted either in juvenile or in criminal court.
(B) The prosecution did not have sufficient grounds to charge the offender with a more serious crime.
(C) The court would consider all extenuating circumstances relevant to his case.
(D) The prosecution could decide to bypass juvenile court review and try the offender in criminal court.
(E) The choice of courts did not rest entirely in the discretion of the prosecution.

Answer: C
Explanation:
By putting immediate criminal culpability on juveniles based merely on their age and the nature of the offense, numerous extenuating circumstances. It would have been considered by a juvenile court judge are now essentially irrelevant. If a 16-year-old was accused of armed robbery in Arizona before 1996, the court would have reduced the charge or sentence.

  1. The author’s main purpose in the passage is to

(A) defend a proposed statutory change against criticism
(B) explain the unforeseen consequences of a legal reform
(C) support a critical evaluation of a statute
(D) criticize the constitutionality of judicial discretion
(E) articulate opposing arguments and propose a reconciliation

Answer: D
Explanation:
The author's tone throughout the article is one of criticism and he is not in favor of the new modification in the juvenile hearing, which leads toward option D. As a result, option D is the appropriate reaction. He concludes, unfortunately, courts have....... judicial review any time soon.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show