In 1896 a Georgia Couple Suing for Damages in the Accidental Death GMAT Reading Comprehension

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Reading Passage Question

In 1896 a Georgia couple suing for damages in the accidental death of their two year old was told that since the child had made no real economic contribution to the family, there was no liability for damages. In contrast, less than a century later, in 1979, the parents of a three-year-old sued in New York for accidental-death damages and won an award of $750,000.

The transformation in social values implicit in juxtaposing these two incidents is the subject of Viviana Zelizer’s excellent book, Pricing the Priceless Child. During the nineteenth century, she argues, the concept of the “useful” child who contributed to the family economy gave way gradually to the present-day notion of the “useless” child who, though producing no income for, and indeed extremely costly to, its parents, is yet considered emotionally “priceless.” Well established among segments of the middle and upper classes by the mid-1800’s, this new view of childhood spread throughout society in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries as reformers introduced child-labor regulations and compulsory education laws predicated in part on the assumption that a child’s emotional value made child labor taboo.

For Zelizer the origins of this transformation were many and complex. The gradual erosion of children’s productive value in a maturing industrial economy, the decline in birth and death rates, especially in child mortality, and the development of the companionate family (a family in which members were united by explicit bonds of love rather than duty) were all factors critical in changing the assessment of children’s worth. Yet “expulsion of children from the ‘cash nexus,’ although clearly shaped by profound changes in the economic, occupational, and family structures,” Zelizer maintains, “was also part of a cultural process ‘of sacralization’ of children’s lives.” Protecting children from the crass business world became enormously important for late-nineteenth-century middle-class Americans, she suggests; this sacralization was a way of resisting what they perceived as the relentless corruption of human values by the marketplace.

In stressing the cultural determinants of a child’s worth, Zelizer takes issue with practitioners of the new “sociological economics,” who have analyzed such traditionally sociological topics as crime, marriage, education, and health solely in terms of their economic determinants. Allowing only a small role for cultural forces in the form of individual “preferences,” these sociologists tend to view all human behaviors as directed primarily by the principle of maximizing economic gain. Zelizer is highly critical of this approach, and emphasizes instead the opposite phenomenon: the power of social values to transform price. As children became more valuable in emotional terms, she argues, their “exchange” or “surrender” value on the market, that is, the conversion of their intangible worth into cash terms, became much greater.

“In 1896 a Georgia couple suing for damages in the accidental death of their child”- is a GMAT reading comprehension exercise. Candidates need to be highly proficient in GMAT reading comprehension. There are 7 comprehension questions in this GMAT reading comprehension section.

The purpose of the GMAT Reading Comprehension questions is to evaluate candidates' comprehension, analysis, and application skills. Candidates who are actively preparing can benefit from GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. It can be inferred from the passage that accidental-death damage awards in America during the nineteenth century tended to be based principally on the

(A) earnings of the person at time of death
(B) wealth of the party causing the death
(C) degree of culpability of the party causing the death
(D) amount of money that had been spent on the person killed
(E) amount of suffering endured by the family of the person killed

Answer: A
Explanation:
A is the appropriate answer. In the 1st paragraph the author mentions an accidental death case. Where the inability of the child to contribute economically has denied the accidental death claim awards . The author remarks how such cases exemplify people’s attitude that is still prevalent in the 20th century. One can identify that the main consideration in assessing the damages in an accidental death case is the income possessed by the deceased person. Only option A aligns with the contents in the passage making it the apt answer. There is no major evidence to validate the claims mentioned in options c, d and e.

  1. It can be inferred from the passage that in the early 1800’s children were generally regarded by their families as individuals who

(A) needed enormous amounts of security and affection
(B) required constant supervision while working
(C) were important to the economic well-being of a family
(D) were unsuited to spending long hours in school
(E) were financial burdens assumed for the good of society

Answer: C
Explanation:
C is the apt answer. In the second paragraph the author discusses the 19th century concept of an economically useless but emotionally priceless child. The present view of childhood has been well stated by both the middle and upper middle class of the mid 1800’s. Hence during the early 1800’s children are considered vital enough to be a part of the economic well- being of the family. A and E mentions an attitude that aligns with the contemporary point of view regarding children. Whereas the issues mentioned in B and D aren’t discussed in the passage. So only C aptly describes the essence of the passage.

  1. Which of the following alternative explanations of the change in the cash value of children would be most likely to be put forward by sociological economists as they are described in the passage?

(A) The cash value of children rose during the nineteenth century because parents began to increase their emotional investment in the upbringing of their children.
(B) The cash value of children rose during the nineteenth century because their expected earnings over the course of a lifetime increased greatly.
(C) The cash value of children rose during the nineteenth century because the spread of humanitarian ideals resulted in a wholesale reappraisal of the worth of an individual.
(D) The cash value of children rose during the nineteenth century because compulsory education laws reduced the supply, and thus raised the costs, of available child labor.
(E) The cash value of children rose during the nineteenth century because of changes in the way negligence law assessed damages in accidental death cases.

Answer: B
Explanation:
According to the author's point of view, people practicing socio economics describe sociology mainly on the basis of economic determinants. It is associated with it and also has a tendency to view all human behavior based on the economic gain principle. This statement supports the rise in the cash value of children in the 19th century. Option A rewards Zeliger’s point of view that contradicts with the views of other socio economists . Option C applies social values and emotional factors which doesn’t support the answer to the question that is being asked. D uses economic arguments to discuss the change but here the economic factors at work are the result of a change. While E gives a legal point of view regarding the change . So B is the only apt answer.

  1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) review the literature in a new academic sub-field
(B) present the central thesis of a recent book
(C) contrast two approaches to analyzing historical change
(D) refute a traditional explanation of a social phenomenon
(E) encourage further work on a neglected historical topic

Answer: B
Explanation:
In the 1st paragraph the author has conflicting views regarding two incidents related to social values that are discussed in Zeliger’s book. The 2nd and 3rd paragraph consists of a short account regarding transformation and various factors adding towards such transformation. The last paragraph is all about how Zeliger’s thesis is different from the rest of other sociological economists. So in a nutshell the passage is all about presenting the central thesis of Zeliger’s book making option B the apt answer. A and E misrepresent the content of the subject matter mentioned in the passage. While C differentiates the two approaches only in the last paragraph and is not the central theme of the passage. D completely appropriates the author's approach.

  1. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following statements was true of American families over the course of the nineteenth century?

(A) The average size of families grew considerably.
(B) The percentage of families involved in industrial work declined dramatically.
(C) Family members became more emotionally bonded to one another.
(D) Family members spent an increasing amount of time working with each other.
(E) Family members became more economically dependent on each other.

Answer: C
Explanation:
In the 3rd paragraph (a family in which members were united by explicit bonds of love rather than duty). The author remarks about Zeliger's disagreement regarding the contemporary point of view regarding childhood that developed in 19th century America. Emotional bonds between families were given prime importance during this period. There is no information validating other statements.

  1. Zelizer refers to all of the following as important influences in changing the assessment of children’s worth EXCEPT changes in

(A) the mortality rate
(B) the nature of industry
(C) the nature of the family
(D) attitudes toward reform movements
(E) attitudes toward the marketplace

Answer: D
Explanation:
The passage randomly mentions reform movements but there has been no mention of changes in the attitude. Neither any discussions related to such change has been mentioned in the passage. A, B and C are discussed elaborately in lines 48-58 as factors Zeliger holds are important enough to change the assessment of children’s worth. E is mentioned in lines 70-80 (sacralization was a way of resisting what they perceived as the relentless corruption of human values by the marketplace).

  1. Which of the following would be most consistent with the practices of sociological economics as these practices are described in the passage?

(A) Arguing that most health-care professionals enter the field because they believe it to be the most socially useful of any occupation
(B) Arguing that most college students choose majors that they believe will lead to the most highly paid jobs available to them
(C) Arguing that most decisions about marriage and divorce are based on rational assessments of the likelihood that each partner will remain committed to the relationship
(D) Analyzing changes in the number of people enrolled in colleges and universities as a function of changes in the economic health of these institutions
(E) Analyzing changes in the ages at which people get married as a function of a change in the average number of years that young people have lived away from their parents

Answer: B
Explanation:
According to practitioners of socio economics most college students would choose majors as they believe in greater economic gain. They will not choose it out of pressure. The statement mentioned in option A is not mentioned in the passage. Option B aligns with the statement that is mentioned. Option C is wrong because most partners would make decisions about marriage. It must be based on the fact that whether the relationship benefits the individual economically or not. There is no mention of things stated in options D and E. Hence option B is the correct answer.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show