Improvements at Company AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Improvements at Company AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can see the purpose of using opinion polls for the Presidential elections has emerged as a heated topic for debate across the United States. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic:

The following appeared in a memorandum from the director of human resources to the executive officers of Company X:
"Last year, we surveyed our employees on improvements needed at Company X by having them rank, in order of importance, the issues presented in a list of possible improvements. Improved communications between employees and management was consistently ranked as the issue of highest importance by the employees who responded to the survey. As you know, we have since instituted regular communications sessions conducted by high-level management, which the employees can attend on a voluntary basis. Therefore, it is likely that most employees at Company X now feel that the improvement most needed at the company has been made."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The implementation of a regularly important link between the company's leadership and the company's workers, as stated by the Director of Human Resources at Firm X. It is the most significant advancement that has been accomplished in the company. This is according to the Director of Human Resources at Firm X. The argument participates in factual distortion and provides a biased vision of the world when presented in this way. The assumptions on which the argument is founded are not supported by the evidence offered. The conclusion is that the argument is not compelling and relies on several logical errors.

To get things started, the dependability of the survey is something that might need some work. Because we do not have information on the number of employees who replied to the poll or the number of workers that were polled, we can't evaluate the validity of the conclusions. For example, if a survey was provided to 200 workers but only 20 responded, the conclusion that most employees saw employee-management conversation and communication as an essential issue would be highly suspect. This is because only 20 of the workers completed the questionnaire. Since the argument does not provide any data that would rule out interpretations such as the one presented here, the survey findings are insufficient to support the author's conclusion. Again, this is because the argument does not provide any data that would rule out interpretations like the one presented here.

To begin, the argument argues that the problem that was rated the most severe was solved by establishing regular communication sessions between high-level management and the workforce. This session takes place every week. This assertion is a stretch since there has been no concrete proof that the sessions have effectively boosted communication. However, this does not make the statement any less accurate. Even if there could have been more chances, this does not guarantee that there was increased and understandable communication between the two parties involved. For instance, some workers may be uncomfortable voicing their concerns in front of such a large audience. Because attendance at the meetings is entirely optional, very few workers may show up to the sessions. This argument would have been strengthened by including a poll in which respondents were asked about the degree to which they agreed with the arrangement that the company was writing.

Second, the argument asserts that the most important and professional problem was the need for improved communication between the management and the workers. This claim is simultaneously unconvincing and does not have any proof to back it up in the argument. It was the humble request from the side of the workers that they choose from a predetermined list of problems. Imagine for a moment that one of the concerns of the utmost importance to the workers of Company X was overlooked while compiling the list. The argument itself does not clarify what concerns were significant enough to make it onto the list, nor does it clarify how relevant those issues were—because of this, testing them before making such a generalization about the situation is necessary.

In conclusion, gathering information on the size of the survey's representative sample is imperative. How many people took part in the survey, and do their responses represent all the different designations offered at business X? The findings of a second survey that researched the effectiveness of the steps that have already been taken in this respect may provide insight into a more portrayal of how successfully the strategy is being implemented. Your argument will amount to nothing more than wishful thinking rather than serious evidence of why things should get better if you do not have the solutions to these problems.

As a consequence, the argument is flawed for the reasons addressed earlier; consequently, it does not provide a productive case. Participating in the development of the advanced research that was provided is one method that is reviewed further. Because we do not have this knowledge, the argument cannot be as legitimate; nevertheless, it is still up for debate.

Suggested AWA GMAT Sample

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Improvements at Company AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER