GMAT Reading Comprehension - One Basic Assumption Lies at the Root of all Security Analysis

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Reading Passage Question

One basic assumption lies at the root of all security analysis: required financial statements balance sheets, earnings statements, quarterly reports provide information that is meaningful but potentially misleading. The Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) offer accountants a wide latitude, with the result that two companies with equivalent production and earnings figures can appear remarkably different based on how each firm chooses to represent itself in statements of earnings and net worth.

Many say that it is a waste of time to stumble through the labyrinth of a companys financial statements. Statistics show that a companys past earnings are not predictive of future earnings and, even if they were, an efficient market would already reflect the change in valuation by affecting the price of the companys stock. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) argues otherwise: financial statements are not intended to give an indication of value otherwise unavailable to the common stockholder, but rather to give an indication of causality. The FASB believes that if stockholders can understand the effect of corporate strategies and external events on a stock, they can more accurately watch for the recurrence of these or similar events and plan sales or purchases accordingly. Financial statements provide such information.

However long this debate continues will be determined by how useful corporations find the reports in pleasing stockholders and how well the evidence of stock market trends reflects the predictions made in the reports. Complicating this prognosis is the average corporations unwillingness to present a less than rosy picture of its financial situation alongside the many independent factors that affect market volatility.

One basic assumption lies at the root of all security analysis.”- is a comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 4 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. The passage is primarily concerned with
  1. arguing for a reexamination of a previously-held belief
  2. explaining the relative merits of two opposing positions
  3. revisiting an old question concerning a company's value
  4. informing the reader of two similar positions
  5. questioning the basis of an accepted piece of wisdom

Answer: B
Explanation: This option is correct. The passage talks about financial reports and how they provide information that is meaningful but can be potentially misleading. Two similar earning companies present reports in different ways. The second paragraph talks about the two opposite views to check the financial reports and their merits. The passage ends with describing the long debated financial report used for Stakeholder and stock market prediction. Option B is correct.

  1. The function of the second paragraph is to
  1. argue against the use of the GAAP-supported accounting methods mentioned in the first paragraph
  2. present an assessment of the usefulness of the GAAP guidelines presented in the first paragraph
  3. support the view described in the first paragraph
  4. introduce a new point of view that disagrees with the main point presented in the first paragraph
  5. indicate an alternative to the points of view presented in the first and third paragraphs

Answer: A
Explanation: This option is correct. According to the second paragraph, "Many say that it is a waste of time to stumble through the labyrinth of a company's financial statements". It clearly means that the second para focusses against the comparison of a company's financial statements. Option A is correct.

  1. The passage suggests that two companies with similar GAAP-acceptable balance sheets and earnings statements
  1. must be similar in product and structure
  2. are useful benchmarks to predict future earnings
  3. may have chosen to represent themselves in similar ways
  4. can exercise many prerogatives in operating their companies
  5. are required to structure themselves differently

Answer: C
Explanation: This option is correct. According to the passage, two given companies may be very similar in balance sheets. Earnings statements, but it is possible that they choose to represent themselves in dramatically different ways. There is another statement that these two companies can represent themselves in similar ways. Option C is correct.

  1. The members of the FASB and their critics disagree about
  1. acceptable sources of financial statements
  2. the usefulness of financial statements as predictors of future earnings
  3. the history of financial statements
  4. the accuracy of financial statements
  5. the best method of interpreting financial statements

Answer: B
Explanation: This option is correct. The passage states that Many’s view "Statistics show that a company's past earnings are not predictive of future earnings". FASB's view that "financial statements are not intended to give an indication of value. Otherwise unavailable to the common stockholder, but rather to give an indication of causality”. So, Option B is correct.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show