Reading Passage Question
In England the burden of history weighs heavily on common law, that unwritten code of time-honored laws derived largely from English judicial custom and precedent. Students of contemporary British law are frequently required to study medieval cases, to interpret archaic Latin maxims, or to confront doctrinal principles whose validity is based solely on their being part of the “timeless reason” of the English legal tradition. Centuries-old custom serves as the basis both for the divisions of law school subject matter and for much of the terminology of legal redress. Connected not only with legal history but also with the cultural history of the English people, common law cannot properly be understood without taking a long historical view.
Yet the academic study of jurisprudence has seldom treated common law as a constantly evolving phenomenon rooted in history; those interpretive theories that do acknowledge the antiquity of common law ignore the practical contemporary significance of its historical forms. The reasons for this omission are partly theoretical and partly political. In theoretical terms, modern jurisprudence has consistently treated law as a unified system of rules that can be studied at any given moment in time as a logical whole. The notion of jurisprudence as a system of norms or principles deemphasizes history in favor of the coherence of a system. In this view, the past of the system is conceived as no more than the continuous succession of its states of presence. In political terms, believing in the logic of law is a necessary part of believing in its fairness; even if history shows the legal tradition to be far from unitary and seldom logical, the prestige of the legal institution requires that jurisprudence treat the tradition as if it were, in essence, the application of known rules to objectively determined facts. To suggest otherwise would be dispiriting for the student and demoralizing for the public.
Legal historian Peter Goodrich has argued, however, that common law is most fruitfully studied as a continually developing tradition rather than as a set of rules. Taking his cue from the study of literature, Goodrich sees common law as a sort of literary text, with history and tradition serving as the text’s narrative development. To study the common law historically, says Goodrich, is to study a text in which fiction is as influential as analysis, perception as significant as rule, and the play of memory as strong as the logic of argument. The concept of tradition, for Goodrich, implies not only the preservation and transmission of existing forms, but also the continuous rewriting of those forms to adapt them to contemporary legal circumstances.
"In England the burden of history weighs heavily on common law"- is a GMAT reading comprehension exercise. Candidates need to be highly proficient in GMAT reading comprehension. There are 8 comprehension questions in this GMAT reading comprehension section. The purpose of the GMAT Reading Comprehension questions is to evaluate candidates' comprehension, analysis, and application skills. Candidates who are actively preparing can benefit from GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
- Which one of the following statements best expresses the main idea of the passage?
(A) The residual influences of common law explain not only the divisions of subject matter but also the terminology associated with many legal procedures.
(B) In the academic study of jurisprudence, theoretical interpretations of common law have traditionally been at odds with political interpretations of common law.
(C) Common law, while often treated as an oral history of the English people, would, according to one scholar, be more fruitfully studied as a universally adaptable and constantly changing system of rules.
(D) Although obviously steeped in history and tradition, common law has seldom been studied in relation to its development, as one theorist proposes that it be understood.
(E) Although usually studied as a unitary and logical system of rules and norms, the history of common law shows that body of law to be anything but consistent and fair.
Answer: (D)
Explanation: The fourth option is correct because it is in line with the pre-thinking and best expresses the passage's main idea. The first option only has partial scope of the passage, and the remaining options are either incorrect or inconsistent.
- It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes which one of the following about the history of law in relation to modern jurisprudence?
(A) Modern jurisprudence misinterprets the nature of the legal tradition.
(B) The history of law proves the original forms of common law to be antiquated and irrelevant to modern jurisprudence.
(C) The history of law, if it is to be made applicable to modern jurisprudence, is best studied as a system of rules rather than as a literary text.
(D) Mainstream theories of modern jurisprudence overlook the order and coherence inherent in legal history.
(E) Mainstream theories of modern jurisprudence, by and large devoid of a sense of legal history, are unnecessarily dispiriting to students and the public alike.
Answer: (A)
Explanation: The first option is the correct answer because it explains why Modern Jurisprudence is incorrect. This inference is already on the right track. This statement can be derived from information at the beginning of the second passage. The rest are all incorrect because they cannot be inferred and are out of context.
- Which one of the following would best exemplify the kind of interpretive theory referred to in the first sentence of the second paragraph of the passage?
(A) a theory that traced modern customs involving property ownership to their origins in medieval practice
(B) a theory that relied on a comparison between modern courtroom procedures and medieval theatrical conventions
(C) a theory that analyzed medieval marriage laws without examining their relationship to modern laws
(D) a theory that compared the development of English common law in the twentieth century with simultaneous developments in German common law without examining the social repercussions of either legal system
(E) a theory that compared rules of evidence in civil courts with those in criminal courts
Answer: (C)
Explanation: The first option is not analogous, and the second is close but only a comparison. Since the comparisons between the English and German situations are irrelevant, the fourth option is invalid. The last option is also irrelevant. As a result, the third option is the correct answer.
- It can be inferred from the passage that Peter Goodrich would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements concerning common law?
(A) Common law is more fruitfully studied as a relic of the history of the English people than as a legal code.
(B) The “text” of common law has degenerated from an early stage of clarity to a current state of incoherence.
(C) Without the public’s belief in the justness of common law, the legal system cannot be perpetuated.
(D) While rich in literary significance, the “text” of common law has only a very limited applicability to modern life.
(E) The common law “text” inherited by future generations will differ from the one currently in use.
Answer: (E)
Explanation: The final option is the correct answer because it corresponds to the passage's statement that the common law text is constantly evolving. The first option states that common law is a relic that completely contradicts this viewpoint, and the remaining options cannot be inferred.
- Which one of the following best defines the word “political” as it is used in the second paragraph of the passage?
(A) concerned with the ways by which people seek to advance themselves in a profession
(B) concerned with the covert and possibly unethical methods by which governments achieve their goals
(C) having to do with the maintenance of ethical standards between professions and the citizenry
(D) having to do with the maintenance of an institution’s effectiveness
(E) having to do with the manner in which institutions are perceived by radical theorists
Answer: (D)
Explanation: The first two options are out of the question. The third option is a tricky one because the passage deals with something ethical, but the goal is different. This makes ethical standards unimportant, so this option is also incorrect. Since the last option is completely out of scope, the fourth option is the right answer because it corresponds to the mentioned paragraph.
- The passage states that students of British law are frequently required to study
(A) histories of English politics
(B) episodes of litigation from the Middle Ages
(C) treatises on political philosophy
(D) histories of ancient Roman jurisprudence
(E) essays on narrative development
Answer: (B)
Explanation: According to the first paragraph, students of contemporary British law are frequently required to study medieval cases. Only the second option describes this detail, while the others contain irrelevant or misclassified facts and information. As a result, the second point is correct.
- Which one of the following best describes the author’s opinion of most modern academic theories of common law?
(A) They are overly detailed and thus stultifying to both the student and the public.
(B) They lack an essential dimension that would increase their accuracy.
(C) They overemphasize the practical aspects of the common law at the expense of the theoretical.
(D) They excuse students of the law from the study of important legal disputes of the past.
(E) They routinely treat the study of the law as an art rather than as a science.
Answer: (B)
Explanation: The author clearly believes that such studies are lacking in some way. The significance of the link between history and common law is that something. The question clearly asks which of the options mentioned best describes the author's point of view. Only the second option corresponds to this, so it is the correct answer; the other options are incorrect.
- The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) explain a paradoxical situation and discuss a new view of the situation
(B) supply a chronological summary of the history of an idea
(C) trace the ideas of an influential theorist and evaluate the theorist’s ongoing work
(D) contrast the legal theories of past eras with those of today and suggest how these theories should be studied
(E) advocate a traditional school of thought while criticizing a new trend
Answer: (A)
Explanation: The first option is correct because it explains how the current methodology of studying law represents a paradoxical situation. It also explains the link that is overlooked by such study methodology. Both the sentences corresponds to the passage's primary goal. The remaining options followingly are incorrect, inconsistent, out of scope, and contradictory making them the wrong answers.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
- GMAT Reading Comprehension- One of the Foundations of Scientific Research is that an Experimental Result is Credible
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Although it is an Imperfect Model for Describing a Complex Market
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - For an Online Retailer, Inventory Represents a Major Source
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Pricing is the most influential medium of communication that companies
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Relieving an impoverished country of its debt would seem to almost unavoidably
- GMAT reading comprehension - American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard
- GMAT reading comprehension - American economists continually attempt to gauge the health of the economy
- GMAT reading comprehension - Sarah Meyers McGinty, in her useful new book Power Talk
- GMAT reading comprehension - The hypothesis that people ascribe more value to things
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Since the dawning of antitrust regulation in America at the beginning of the twentieth century
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - The term "editor" covers a number of functions ranging
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Lee Bollinger, rejecting traditional models of the defense
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Maria Helena P.T. Machados’s bilingual edition of Brazil Through the Eyes
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - In his New York Times blog in August, 2006, Douglas Coupland
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - That placebos can cure everything from dandruff to leprosy
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Research data indicate that there is a great deal of poverty in the United States
- GMAT reading comprehension - From the Beginning, Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) was Convinced about the Basic Astronomical Verities.
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - It is So Uncommon for a Rarified Academic Term to Make the Leap.
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Typically managed by small groups such as husband-and-wife teams
- GMAT Reading Comprehension - Direct Observation of Contemporary Societies at the Threshold
Comments