Environmentalists Associated with the United Nations Environment Programme GMAT Critical Reasoning

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Question: Environmentalists associated with the United Nations Environment Programme predict that if the current trends associated with global warming continue, thousands of acres of pristine land is in danger to undergo potentially irrevocable changes that could alter the planet's ecosystem forever.

  1. is in danger to undergo
  2. are in danger of undergoing
  3. is in danger of undergoing
  4. are in danger to undergo
  5. are in danger for undergoing

“Environmentalists Associated with the United Nations Environment Programme” - is a GMAT critical reasoning topic. This GMAT critical comes with five options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument.  Candidates get 65 minutes to answer 36 MCQ questions in the critical reasoning section of the GMAT.

Answer: B
Explanation
:
This is a GMAT critical reasoning question. An assumption is an implied hypothesis. So we are looking for something that is implied in the argument. In case it is wrong or maybe disable the argument.

The statement states-

Environmentalists associated with the United Nations Environment Programme predict that if the current trends associated with global warming continue, thousands of acres of pristine land is in danger to undergo potentially irrevocable changes that could alter the planet's ecosystem forever.

(A) is in danger to undergo
(B) are in danger of undergoing
(C) is in danger of undergoing
(D) are in danger to undergo
(E) are in danger for undergoing

Two splits can be used to answer this question.

Split #1: to undergo vs of undergoing
Split #2: is in danger vs are in danger

Split #1:
This sentence is made up of two clauses. Clause 1: Environmentalists predict.
Clause 2: that if the current trends associated with global warming continue, thousands of acres of land are/is in danger of/to undergoing/undergo .…
We are interested in clause 2. What is the subject of the verb are/is? Thousands of acres of land. Since lands are inanimate, they can't have purpose. So, to undergo is wrong. Based on this we can eliminate A and D.
You can also eliminate E for the wrong prepositional phrase for undergoing. The right idiom is danger of not danger for.

Split #2: Subject verb agreement. The subject is plural, hence the plural verb is required. We can therefore eliminate C based on this.

option B as the right answer.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show