Despite The Early Protectionist Moves, Such As Introducing Steel Tariffs GMAT Reading Comprehension

Reading Passage Question

Despite the early protectionist moves, such as introducing steel tariffs, the Bush administration has pushed hard for trade liberalization in the past few years. In contrast, the European Union has appeared divided and ineffective. Its trade commissioner, Peter Mandelson, has so far failed to persuade skeptical member states that the benefits of new export markets will outweigh the costs of allowing greater competition at home, especially in agriculture. Though some members, notably Britain and other north Europeans, favor a more liberal approach, it has proved all but impossible to get agreement from France and other more protected economies with vociferous farmers. Europe’s general position has been to refuse any more lowering of agricultural barriers until poorer countries agree to liberalize trade in goods and services.

Nor is the G20 group of developing nations giving much impetus to the talks. Led by India and Brazil, the G20 is refusing to negotiate without deeper concessions on agriculture. India, with its large population, may turn out to be a big problem. Its government worries that competition from Chinese factories and American farms represents too great a threat, while gaining more access to world markets is only of limited attraction.

Other poor countries are also unsure what they would gain. There is general talk of hopeful prospects for poor farmers gaining greater access to rich-world markets. But the benefits will not flow evenly from rich to poor. The World Bank estimates that removing current agricultural distortions would produce a general benefit of more than $300 billion a year. Relative to national income, poor countries would enjoy a third more of this benefit than rich, industrialized ones. However, nearly half of that benefit would come from reforms by the developing countries themselves, something governments might do anyway were it not for the serious problem of the political pain the reforms are bound to cause.

The impasse first led to the deadline for an agreement, which was originally supposed to be settled at the Hong Kong ministerial meeting in December 2005, to slip to the end of April 2006. Now, in theory, this is to be resolved by the middle of summer 2006. Missed deadlines may be nothing new for the World Trade Organization (WTO), but these deadlines matter. There is no further room to slide from them. The American government’s fast-track negotiating authority, which forces Congress to accept or reject a trade bill without introducing amendments, is thought to be essential if America is to take part in talks. The authority expired in 2007 and few expect it to be renewed. Too many American politicians are once again turning protectionist. Congress only barely passed the Bush administration’s Central America Free Trade Agreement, even though its impact on the American economy will be tiny compared to the ambitions for Doha. And as it will take roughly a year to work out the finer details of any world trade agreement, the outstanding issues must be resolved early enough for the Bush administration to get a deal through Congress.

“Despite the early protectionist moves, such as introducing steel tariffs”- is a reading comprehension passage with answers for the GMAT. Candidates must have a strong understanding of English GMAT reading comprehension. This GMAT Reading Comprehension section contains 7 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are intended to assess candidates' abilities to comprehend, analyze, and apply information or concepts. GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions can help candidates actively prepare.

Solutions and Explanation

  1. It can be inferred that a removal of agricultural distortions would provide gains to poor countries of approximately

(A) $300 million per year.
(B) $500 million per year.
(C) $100 billion per year.
(D) $300 billion per year.
(E) $500 billion per year.

Answer: C
Explanation
: It can be assumed that the elimination of agricultural distortions would benefit developing nations by about $100 billion annually. The first option is the right answer according to this. The remaining options are all wrong answers because they have a value that is too far-fetched or very low.

  1. The Indian government aims to

(A) penetrate Chinese consumer markets.
(B) reduce barriers to the sale of its farm produce.
(C) impose more restrictive trade policies.
(D) improve its bargaining position.
(E) protect its farmers against foreign competition.

Answer: B
Explanation: Like many other "poorer" nations, India's government wants developed nations to lower their import restrictions on agricultural goods. The above statement can be inferred from the second paragraph of the passage. In accordance with this, the second option is the right answer. The remaining options are all incorrect choices.

  1. According to the passage, the American legislature is

(A) liberalizing its policy toward foreign trade.
(B) sensitive to the demands of third-world countries.
(C) becoming more protectionist.
(D) pushing hard for trade liberalization.
(E) opposing any amendment to existing world trade agreements.

Answer: C
Explanation: The passage claims that American legislation is moving in a more protectionist direction. The third option is the right answer. This is because it can correspond to the inference given above. The remaining options are all wrong answers as they have distorted information or inconsistent statements.

  1. Achieving an agreement at the latest round of trade talks seems doubtful because

(A) the EU trade commissioner has failed to persuade India and China to liberalize exports of farm produce.
(B) America’s fast-track negotiating authority is soon to expire.
(C) poorer countries refuse to lower agricultural barriers until developed countries open their markets to manufactured goods.
(D) both the EU and G20 groups are unsure of the gains that might accrue from an agreement.
(E) Britain and France are steadfastly against a new agreement.

Answer: D
Explanation: An important point is illustrated in the third and first paragraphs. The benefits and costs of a new trade agreement are unclear to some members of the European Union as well as to the G20 group of developing countries. As a result, the fourth option is the right answer as it is in correspondence with this. The remaining options are either opposite or have wrong information.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show